{"id":{"repo_id":"uthsc","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu:utgsbs_dissertations-2222"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uthsc/oai:digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu:utgsbs_dissertations-2222","repository":{"repo_id":"uthsc","name":"University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Roles of Small Rnas and Paralogous Proteins In Bacillus Anthracis Virulence Gene Regulation","abstract":"<p>Bacteria have evolved a myriad of regulatory mechanisms to control gene expression. One of the most common mechanisms is post-transcriptional control through the function of small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs). Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are short transcripts that base-pair to mRNA targets or interact with regulatory proteins. sRNA function has been studied extensively in Gram-negative bacteria; comparatively less is known about sRNAs in Firmicutes. In this dissertation, I investigated two sRNAs encoded within the virulence plasmid pXO1 of <em>Bacillus anthracis</em>, the causative agent of anthrax. The sRNAs, named “XrrA and XrrB” (for p­XO1-encoded regulatory RNA) are abundant and highly stable primary transcripts, whose expression is dependent upon AtxA, the master virulence regulator of <em>B. anthracis</em>. sRNA levels are highest during culture conditions that promote AtxA expression and activity. Stability of the sRNAs is unaffected in <em>hfq</em>-null mutants. Comparison of the transcriptome of a virulent Ames-derived strain to the transcriptome of isogenic sRNA-null mutants revealed multiple 4.0- to >100-fold differences in gene expression. Most regulatory effects were associated with XrrA, although regulation of some transcripts suggests functional overlap between XrrA and XrrB. Many sRNA-regulated targets were chromosome genes associated with branched-chain amino acid metabolism, proteolysis, and transmembrane transport. <em>In silico</em> analysis revealed complementarity between XrrA and the 5’ UTR of seven mRNA transcripts whose expression is affected by the sRNA, suggesting base-pairing interactions. A translational fusion of one of these targets, the secreted metalloprotease <em>inhA1</em>, to GFP suggests XrrA-mediated regulation of protease translation. XrrA appears to mediate base-pairing interactions with the<em> inhA1 </em>RBS via a C-rich motif typical of other Gram-positive sRNAs. In a mouse model for systemic anthrax, the lungs, livers, and brains of animals infected with <em>xrrA</em>-null mutants had a small reduction in bacterial burden, suggesting a role for XrrA in <em>B. anthracis</em> pathogenesis. Deletion of the XrrA-regulated branched chain amino acid (BCAA) biosynthesis (<em>ilvD</em>) and transport (<em>brnQ3</em>) genes led to severe attenuation in the same model. XrrA and XrrB are the first reported sRNAs of <em>B. anthracis</em>. Future work should focus on the molecular basis for sRNA function, including investigations of potential RNA and/or protein interacting partners of XrrA and XrrB.</p> <p>Another common mechanism of bacterial gene regulation is transcriptional control through the function of regulatory proteins that bind DNA. The <em>pagA</em> gene, encoding the protective antigen component of the anthrax toxin of <em>B. anthracis</em>, is part of a bicistronic operon that codes for its own repressor, the dimeric protein PagR1. PagR1 also regulates <em>sap</em> and <em>eag</em>, two genes encoding components of the surface layer (S-layer), a protein layer found between the cell wall and capsule which serves as a mounting structure for key surface-associated proteins. Genomic and transcriptomic studies identified a 70% identical paralog of PagR1, termed PagR2, found in the pXO2 plasmid. In this work I examined PagR1 and PagR2 for functional similarity. Recombinant PagR1 and PagR2 expressed individually in a ∆<em>pagR1</em> pXO1<sup>+</sup>/pXO2<sup>-</sup> background comparably repressed expression of <em>pagA</em>, <em>atxA</em>, <em>sap</em>, and <em>eag</em>, suggesting functional redundancy. PagR1 readily bound promoters of these genes, while PagR2 weakly bound only the <em>pagA</em> and <em>atxA </em>promoters <em>in vitro</em>. The unequal DNA binding capacity of these two highly identical proteins is partially explained by one key amino acid difference between them. The eighty-first amino acid, which in PagR1 is a surface-exposed tyrosine (Y), is a buried serine (S) residue in PagR2. Recombinant PagR2 S81Y bound the S-layer<em> </em>promoters with binding affinity comparable to that of PagR1. Furthermore, while PagR1 forms readily detectable dimers, PagR2 dimers can only be visualized using a crosslinking agent. Mutation of S81 to Y allows PagR2 to form dimers detected without crosslinking. Interaction between native PagR1 and PagR2 S81Y suggests a role for the tyrosine residue in mediating protein:protein interactions. Future studies should focus on assessing <em>in vivo</em> interactions between the native proteins and expanding our knowledge of the PagR1 and PagR2 regulons.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Bacteria have evolved a myriad of regulatory mechanisms to control gene expression. One of the most common mechanisms is post-transcriptional control through the function of small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs). Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are short transcripts that base-pair to mRNA targets or interact with regulatory proteins. sRNA function has been studied extensively in Gram-negative bacteria; comparatively less is known about sRNAs in Firmicutes. In this dissertation, I investigated two sRNAs encoded within the virulence plasmid pXO1 of &lt;em&gt;Bacillus anthracis&lt;/em&gt;, the causative agent of anthrax. The sRNAs, named “XrrA and XrrB” (for p­XO1-encoded regulatory RNA) are abundant and highly stable primary transcripts, whose expression is dependent upon AtxA, the master virulence regulator of &lt;em&gt;B. anthracis&lt;/em&gt;. sRNA levels are highest during culture conditions that promote AtxA expression and activity. Stability of the sRNAs is unaffected in &lt;em&gt;hfq&lt;/em&gt;-null mutants. Comparison of the transcriptome of a virulent Ames-derived strain to the transcriptome of isogenic sRNA-null mutants revealed multiple 4.0- to &gt;100-fold differences in gene expression. Most regulatory effects were associated with XrrA, although regulation of some transcripts suggests functional overlap between XrrA and XrrB. Many sRNA-regulated targets were chromosome genes associated with branched-chain amino acid metabolism, proteolysis, and transmembrane transport. &lt;em&gt;In silico&lt;/em&gt; analysis revealed complementarity between XrrA and the 5’ UTR of seven mRNA transcripts whose expression is affected by the sRNA, suggesting base-pairing interactions. A translational fusion of one of these targets, the secreted metalloprotease &lt;em&gt;inhA1&lt;/em&gt;, to GFP suggests XrrA-mediated regulation of protease translation. XrrA appears to mediate base-pairing interactions with the&lt;em&gt; inhA1 &lt;/em&gt;RBS via a C-rich motif typical of other Gram-positive sRNAs. In a mouse model for systemic anthrax, the lungs, livers, and brains of animals infected with &lt;em&gt;xrrA&lt;/em&gt;-null mutants had a small reduction in bacterial burden, suggesting a role for XrrA in &lt;em&gt;B. anthracis&lt;/em&gt; pathogenesis. Deletion of the XrrA-regulated branched chain amino acid (BCAA) biosynthesis (&lt;em&gt;ilvD&lt;/em&gt;) and transport (&lt;em&gt;brnQ3&lt;/em&gt;) genes led to severe attenuation in the same model. XrrA and XrrB are the first reported sRNAs of &lt;em&gt;B. anthracis&lt;/em&gt;. Future work should focus on the molecular basis for sRNA function, including investigations of potential RNA and/or protein interacting partners of XrrA and XrrB.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Another common mechanism of bacterial gene regulation is transcriptional control through the function of regulatory proteins that bind DNA. The &lt;em&gt;pagA&lt;/em&gt; gene, encoding the protective antigen component of the anthrax toxin of &lt;em&gt;B. anthracis&lt;/em&gt;, is part of a bicistronic operon that codes for its own repressor, the dimeric protein PagR1. PagR1 also regulates &lt;em&gt;sap&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;eag&lt;/em&gt;, two genes encoding components of the surface layer (S-layer), a protein layer found between the cell wall and capsule which serves as a mounting structure for key surface-associated proteins. Genomic and transcriptomic studies identified a 70% identical paralog of PagR1, termed PagR2, found in the pXO2 plasmid. In this work I examined PagR1 and PagR2 for functional similarity. Recombinant PagR1 and PagR2 expressed individually in a ∆&lt;em&gt;pagR1&lt;/em&gt; pXO1&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;/pXO2&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt; background comparably repressed expression of &lt;em&gt;pagA&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;atxA&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;sap&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;eag&lt;/em&gt;, suggesting functional redundancy. PagR1 readily bound promoters of these genes, while PagR2 weakly bound only the &lt;em&gt;pagA&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;atxA &lt;/em&gt;promoters &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt;. The unequal DNA binding capacity of these two highly identical proteins is partially explained by one key amino acid difference between them. The eighty-first amino acid, which in PagR1 is a surface-exposed tyrosine (Y), is a buried serine (S) residue in PagR2. Recombinant PagR2 S81Y bound the S-layer&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;promoters with binding affinity comparable to that of PagR1. Furthermore, while PagR1 forms readily detectable dimers, PagR2 dimers can only be visualized using a crosslinking agent. Mutation of S81 to Y allows PagR2 to form dimers detected without crosslinking. Interaction between native PagR1 and PagR2 S81Y suggests a role for the tyrosine residue in mediating protein:protein interactions. Future studies should focus on assessing &lt;em&gt;in vivo&lt;/em&gt; interactions between the native proteins and expanding our knowledge of the PagR1 and PagR2 regulons.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Corsi, Ileana","<p>http://www.orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-9105</p>"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)","degree_level":"Dissertation (PhD)","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Theresa M. Koehler","Ambro van Hoof","Danielle Garsin"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2022-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:50:09Z","subjects":["Bacillus anthracis","plasmid","pXO1","sRNA","RNA-seq","transcription","translation","paralogs","toxin","Bacteriology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1157","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Theresa M. Koehler","Ambro van Hoof","Danielle Garsin"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Corsi, Ileana","<p>http://www.orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-9105</p>"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-04-11T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation (PhD)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Bacillus anthracis","plasmid","pXO1","sRNA","RNA-seq","transcription","translation","paralogs","toxin","Bacteriology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1157"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Bacteria have evolved a myriad of regulatory mechanisms to control gene expression. One of the most common mechanisms is post-transcriptional control through the function of small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs). Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are short transcripts that base-pair to mRNA targets or interact with regulatory proteins. sRNA function has been studied extensively in Gram-negative bacteria; comparatively less is known about sRNAs in Firmicutes. In this dissertation, I investigated two sRNAs encoded within the virulence plasmid pXO1 of <em>Bacillus anthracis</em>, the causative agent of anthrax. The sRNAs, named “XrrA and XrrB” (for p­XO1-encoded regulatory RNA) are abundant and highly stable primary transcripts, whose expression is dependent upon AtxA, the master virulence regulator of <em>B. anthracis</em>. sRNA levels are highest during culture conditions that promote AtxA expression and activity. Stability of the sRNAs is unaffected in <em>hfq</em>-null mutants. Comparison of the transcriptome of a virulent Ames-derived strain to the transcriptome of isogenic sRNA-null mutants revealed multiple 4.0- to >100-fold differences in gene expression. Most regulatory effects were associated with XrrA, although regulation of some transcripts suggests functional overlap between XrrA and XrrB. Many sRNA-regulated targets were chromosome genes associated with branched-chain amino acid metabolism, proteolysis, and transmembrane transport. <em>In silico</em> analysis revealed complementarity between XrrA and the 5’ UTR of seven mRNA transcripts whose expression is affected by the sRNA, suggesting base-pairing interactions. A translational fusion of one of these targets, the secreted metalloprotease <em>inhA1</em>, to GFP suggests XrrA-mediated regulation of protease translation. XrrA appears to mediate base-pairing interactions with the<em> inhA1 </em>RBS via a C-rich motif typical of other Gram-positive sRNAs. In a mouse model for systemic anthrax, the lungs, livers, and brains of animals infected with <em>xrrA</em>-null mutants had a small reduction in bacterial burden, suggesting a role for XrrA in <em>B. anthracis</em> pathogenesis. Deletion of the XrrA-regulated branched chain amino acid (BCAA) biosynthesis (<em>ilvD</em>) and transport (<em>brnQ3</em>) genes led to severe attenuation in the same model. XrrA and XrrB are the first reported sRNAs of <em>B. anthracis</em>. Future work should focus on the molecular basis for sRNA function, including investigations of potential RNA and/or protein interacting partners of XrrA and XrrB.</p> <p>Another common mechanism of bacterial gene regulation is transcriptional control through the function of regulatory proteins that bind DNA. The <em>pagA</em> gene, encoding the protective antigen component of the anthrax toxin of <em>B. anthracis</em>, is part of a bicistronic operon that codes for its own repressor, the dimeric protein PagR1. PagR1 also regulates <em>sap</em> and <em>eag</em>, two genes encoding components of the surface layer (S-layer), a protein layer found between the cell wall and capsule which serves as a mounting structure for key surface-associated proteins. Genomic and transcriptomic studies identified a 70% identical paralog of PagR1, termed PagR2, found in the pXO2 plasmid. In this work I examined PagR1 and PagR2 for functional similarity. Recombinant PagR1 and PagR2 expressed individually in a ∆<em>pagR1</em> pXO1<sup>+</sup>/pXO2<sup>-</sup> background comparably repressed expression of <em>pagA</em>, <em>atxA</em>, <em>sap</em>, and <em>eag</em>, suggesting functional redundancy. PagR1 readily bound promoters of these genes, while PagR2 weakly bound only the <em>pagA</em> and <em>atxA </em>promoters <em>in vitro</em>. The unequal DNA binding capacity of these two highly identical proteins is partially explained by one key amino acid difference between them. The eighty-first amino acid, which in PagR1 is a surface-exposed tyrosine (Y), is a buried serine (S) residue in PagR2. Recombinant PagR2 S81Y bound the S-layer<em> </em>promoters with binding affinity comparable to that of PagR1. Furthermore, while PagR1 forms readily detectable dimers, PagR2 dimers can only be visualized using a crosslinking agent. Mutation of S81 to Y allows PagR2 to form dimers detected without crosslinking. Interaction between native PagR1 and PagR2 S81Y suggests a role for the tyrosine residue in mediating protein:protein interactions. Future studies should focus on assessing <em>in vivo</em> interactions between the native proteins and expanding our knowledge of the PagR1 and PagR2 regulons.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Roles of Small Rnas and Paralogous Proteins In Bacillus Anthracis Virulence Gene Regulation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Theresa M. Koehler","Ambro van Hoof","Danielle Garsin"],"dc:creator":["Corsi, Ileana","<p>http://www.orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-9105</p>"],"dc:date.available":["2023-04-11T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Bacteria have evolved a myriad of regulatory mechanisms to control gene expression. One of the most common mechanisms is post-transcriptional control through the function of small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs). Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are short transcripts that base-pair to mRNA targets or interact with regulatory proteins. sRNA function has been studied extensively in Gram-negative bacteria; comparatively less is known about sRNAs in Firmicutes. In this dissertation, I investigated two sRNAs encoded within the virulence plasmid pXO1 of <em>Bacillus anthracis</em>, the causative agent of anthrax. The sRNAs, named “XrrA and XrrB” (for p­XO1-encoded regulatory RNA) are abundant and highly stable primary transcripts, whose expression is dependent upon AtxA, the master virulence regulator of <em>B. anthracis</em>. sRNA levels are highest during culture conditions that promote AtxA expression and activity. Stability of the sRNAs is unaffected in <em>hfq</em>-null mutants. Comparison of the transcriptome of a virulent Ames-derived strain to the transcriptome of isogenic sRNA-null mutants revealed multiple 4.0- to >100-fold differences in gene expression. Most regulatory effects were associated with XrrA, although regulation of some transcripts suggests functional overlap between XrrA and XrrB. Many sRNA-regulated targets were chromosome genes associated with branched-chain amino acid metabolism, proteolysis, and transmembrane transport. <em>In silico</em> analysis revealed complementarity between XrrA and the 5’ UTR of seven mRNA transcripts whose expression is affected by the sRNA, suggesting base-pairing interactions. A translational fusion of one of these targets, the secreted metalloprotease <em>inhA1</em>, to GFP suggests XrrA-mediated regulation of protease translation. XrrA appears to mediate base-pairing interactions with the<em> inhA1 </em>RBS via a C-rich motif typical of other Gram-positive sRNAs. In a mouse model for systemic anthrax, the lungs, livers, and brains of animals infected with <em>xrrA</em>-null mutants had a small reduction in bacterial burden, suggesting a role for XrrA in <em>B. anthracis</em> pathogenesis. Deletion of the XrrA-regulated branched chain amino acid (BCAA) biosynthesis (<em>ilvD</em>) and transport (<em>brnQ3</em>) genes led to severe attenuation in the same model. XrrA and XrrB are the first reported sRNAs of <em>B. anthracis</em>. Future work should focus on the molecular basis for sRNA function, including investigations of potential RNA and/or protein interacting partners of XrrA and XrrB.</p> <p>Another common mechanism of bacterial gene regulation is transcriptional control through the function of regulatory proteins that bind DNA. The <em>pagA</em> gene, encoding the protective antigen component of the anthrax toxin of <em>B. anthracis</em>, is part of a bicistronic operon that codes for its own repressor, the dimeric protein PagR1. PagR1 also regulates <em>sap</em> and <em>eag</em>, two genes encoding components of the surface layer (S-layer), a protein layer found between the cell wall and capsule which serves as a mounting structure for key surface-associated proteins. Genomic and transcriptomic studies identified a 70% identical paralog of PagR1, termed PagR2, found in the pXO2 plasmid. In this work I examined PagR1 and PagR2 for functional similarity. Recombinant PagR1 and PagR2 expressed individually in a ∆<em>pagR1</em> pXO1<sup>+</sup>/pXO2<sup>-</sup> background comparably repressed expression of <em>pagA</em>, <em>atxA</em>, <em>sap</em>, and <em>eag</em>, suggesting functional redundancy. PagR1 readily bound promoters of these genes, while PagR2 weakly bound only the <em>pagA</em> and <em>atxA </em>promoters <em>in vitro</em>. The unequal DNA binding capacity of these two highly identical proteins is partially explained by one key amino acid difference between them. The eighty-first amino acid, which in PagR1 is a surface-exposed tyrosine (Y), is a buried serine (S) residue in PagR2. Recombinant PagR2 S81Y bound the S-layer<em> </em>promoters with binding affinity comparable to that of PagR1. Furthermore, while PagR1 forms readily detectable dimers, PagR2 dimers can only be visualized using a crosslinking agent. Mutation of S81 to Y allows PagR2 to form dimers detected without crosslinking. Interaction between native PagR1 and PagR2 S81Y suggests a role for the tyrosine residue in mediating protein:protein interactions. Future studies should focus on assessing <em>in vivo</em> interactions between the native proteins and expanding our knowledge of the PagR1 and PagR2 regulons.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1157"],"dc:subject":["Bacillus anthracis","plasmid","pXO1","sRNA","RNA-seq","transcription","translation","paralogs","toxin","Bacteriology"],"dc:title":["Roles of Small Rnas and Paralogous Proteins In Bacillus Anthracis Virulence Gene Regulation"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation (PhD)"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:50:09Z"}