{"id":{"repo_id":"uthsc","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu:utgsbs_dissertations-2194"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uthsc/oai:digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu:utgsbs_dissertations-2194","repository":{"repo_id":"uthsc","name":"University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Advancement of A 3D Computational Phantom and Its Age Scaling Methodologies For Retrospective Dose Reconstruction Studies","abstract":"<p>We have used a 3D age-scalable computational phantom for over two decades for retrospective dose reconstruction studies of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) treated with 2D historic radiotherapy (RT). However, our phantom and its age scaling functions (ASF) must be updated so that it can be used in studies that include survivors treated with contemporary RT. We aimed to implement our phantom and its age scaling functions in DICOM format and determine the feasibility of applying our ASFs to accurately scale the whole-body CT-based anatomies.</p> <p>In the implementation study, we developed Python scripts that model the phantom and ASFs in a treatment planning system (TPS). We validated the implementation by comparing several geometric and anthropometric parameters with reference datasets. We then conducted a dosimetric analysis to determine the accuracy of dose calculation using our phantom. In the feasibility study, we downscaled various computed tomography (CT)-based phantoms from the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) phantom library to arbitrary ages. We quantified the geometric accuracy of scaling by comparing several overlaps, distance, and anthropometric parameters of the scaled phantom with reference datasets. We also assessed the dosimetric impact of ASFs by quantifying the difference in dose from standard Wilms’ tumor RT plan simulated on exact age-scaled and nearest age-matched phantom while using the same field size and anatomical landmark dependent field size in two different scenarios.</p> <p>This study showed that phantoms were implemented in DICOM format within 3% of points/volume of our original phantoms. The heights and dosimetric accuracy were within 7% of ground-truth values. In the feasibility study, overlap metrics showed “good” agreement for most cases except pancreas and kidneys. The maximum displacement of 4.1cm was obtained in the scaled liver. In both implementation and feasibility studies, organ masses were smaller than reference masses in general. A difference of 6% and 1.3Gy was obtained for percent volume ≥ 15Gy (V15) and mean dose, respectively, across two phantom categories when the same field size was used. Both metrics were significantly different (p<0.05) for partially in-beam organs when field size varied. Overall, our results show that phantom and ASFs can be accurately used in TPS for modern RT studies, and our ASFs can accurately scale whole-body CT-based anatomy.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;We have used a 3D age-scalable computational phantom for over two decades for retrospective dose reconstruction studies of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) treated with 2D historic radiotherapy (RT). However, our phantom and its age scaling functions (ASF) must be updated so that it can be used in studies that include survivors treated with contemporary RT. We aimed to implement our phantom and its age scaling functions in DICOM format and determine the feasibility of applying our ASFs to accurately scale the whole-body CT-based anatomies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In the implementation study, we developed Python scripts that model the phantom and ASFs in a treatment planning system (TPS). We validated the implementation by comparing several geometric and anthropometric parameters with reference datasets. We then conducted a dosimetric analysis to determine the accuracy of dose calculation using our phantom. In the feasibility study, we downscaled various computed tomography (CT)-based phantoms from the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) phantom library to arbitrary ages. We quantified the geometric accuracy of scaling by comparing several overlaps, distance, and anthropometric parameters of the scaled phantom with reference datasets. We also assessed the dosimetric impact of ASFs by quantifying the difference in dose from standard Wilms’ tumor RT plan simulated on exact age-scaled and nearest age-matched phantom while using the same field size and anatomical landmark dependent field size in two different scenarios.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This study showed that phantoms were implemented in DICOM format within 3% of points/volume of our original phantoms. The heights and dosimetric accuracy were within 7% of ground-truth values. In the feasibility study, overlap metrics showed “good” agreement for most cases except pancreas and kidneys. The maximum displacement of 4.1cm was obtained in the scaled liver. In both implementation and feasibility studies, organ masses were smaller than reference masses in general. A difference of 6% and 1.3Gy was obtained for percent volume ≥ 15Gy (V15) and mean dose, respectively, across two phantom categories when the same field size was used. Both metrics were significantly different (p&lt;0.05) for partially in-beam organs when field size varied. Overall, our results show that phantom and ASFs can be accurately used in TPS for modern RT studies, and our ASFs can accurately scale whole-body CT-based anatomy.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Gupta, Aashish","<p>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-0921</p>"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Masters of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Thesis (MS)","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D.","Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D.","Choonsik Lee, Ph.D."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-08-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2021-08-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:49:23Z","subjects":["Computational Phantoms","Late Effects","Pediatric Phantoms","Dose Reconstruction","Phantom Scaling","Scaling Factors","Biological and Chemical Physics","Medical Biophysics","Medicine and Health Sciences","Oncology","Other Medical Sciences","Other Physics","Pediatrics","Radiation Medicine"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1138","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D.","Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D.","Choonsik Lee, Ph.D."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Gupta, Aashish","<p>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-0921</p>"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-08-09T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis (MS)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Masters of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Computational Phantoms","Late Effects","Pediatric Phantoms","Dose Reconstruction","Phantom Scaling","Scaling Factors","Biological and Chemical Physics","Medical Biophysics","Medicine and Health Sciences","Oncology","Other Medical Sciences","Other Physics","Pediatrics","Radiation Medicine"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1138"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>We have used a 3D age-scalable computational phantom for over two decades for retrospective dose reconstruction studies of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) treated with 2D historic radiotherapy (RT). However, our phantom and its age scaling functions (ASF) must be updated so that it can be used in studies that include survivors treated with contemporary RT. We aimed to implement our phantom and its age scaling functions in DICOM format and determine the feasibility of applying our ASFs to accurately scale the whole-body CT-based anatomies.</p> <p>In the implementation study, we developed Python scripts that model the phantom and ASFs in a treatment planning system (TPS). We validated the implementation by comparing several geometric and anthropometric parameters with reference datasets. We then conducted a dosimetric analysis to determine the accuracy of dose calculation using our phantom. In the feasibility study, we downscaled various computed tomography (CT)-based phantoms from the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) phantom library to arbitrary ages. We quantified the geometric accuracy of scaling by comparing several overlaps, distance, and anthropometric parameters of the scaled phantom with reference datasets. We also assessed the dosimetric impact of ASFs by quantifying the difference in dose from standard Wilms’ tumor RT plan simulated on exact age-scaled and nearest age-matched phantom while using the same field size and anatomical landmark dependent field size in two different scenarios.</p> <p>This study showed that phantoms were implemented in DICOM format within 3% of points/volume of our original phantoms. The heights and dosimetric accuracy were within 7% of ground-truth values. In the feasibility study, overlap metrics showed “good” agreement for most cases except pancreas and kidneys. The maximum displacement of 4.1cm was obtained in the scaled liver. In both implementation and feasibility studies, organ masses were smaller than reference masses in general. A difference of 6% and 1.3Gy was obtained for percent volume ≥ 15Gy (V15) and mean dose, respectively, across two phantom categories when the same field size was used. Both metrics were significantly different (p<0.05) for partially in-beam organs when field size varied. Overall, our results show that phantom and ASFs can be accurately used in TPS for modern RT studies, and our ASFs can accurately scale whole-body CT-based anatomy.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Advancement of A 3D Computational Phantom and Its Age Scaling Methodologies For Retrospective Dose Reconstruction Studies"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D.","Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D.","Choonsik Lee, Ph.D."],"dc:creator":["Gupta, Aashish","<p>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-0921</p>"],"dc:date.available":["2021-08-09T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>We have used a 3D age-scalable computational phantom for over two decades for retrospective dose reconstruction studies of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) treated with 2D historic radiotherapy (RT). However, our phantom and its age scaling functions (ASF) must be updated so that it can be used in studies that include survivors treated with contemporary RT. We aimed to implement our phantom and its age scaling functions in DICOM format and determine the feasibility of applying our ASFs to accurately scale the whole-body CT-based anatomies.</p> <p>In the implementation study, we developed Python scripts that model the phantom and ASFs in a treatment planning system (TPS). We validated the implementation by comparing several geometric and anthropometric parameters with reference datasets. We then conducted a dosimetric analysis to determine the accuracy of dose calculation using our phantom. In the feasibility study, we downscaled various computed tomography (CT)-based phantoms from the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) phantom library to arbitrary ages. We quantified the geometric accuracy of scaling by comparing several overlaps, distance, and anthropometric parameters of the scaled phantom with reference datasets. We also assessed the dosimetric impact of ASFs by quantifying the difference in dose from standard Wilms’ tumor RT plan simulated on exact age-scaled and nearest age-matched phantom while using the same field size and anatomical landmark dependent field size in two different scenarios.</p> <p>This study showed that phantoms were implemented in DICOM format within 3% of points/volume of our original phantoms. The heights and dosimetric accuracy were within 7% of ground-truth values. In the feasibility study, overlap metrics showed “good” agreement for most cases except pancreas and kidneys. The maximum displacement of 4.1cm was obtained in the scaled liver. In both implementation and feasibility studies, organ masses were smaller than reference masses in general. A difference of 6% and 1.3Gy was obtained for percent volume ≥ 15Gy (V15) and mean dose, respectively, across two phantom categories when the same field size was used. Both metrics were significantly different (p<0.05) for partially in-beam organs when field size varied. Overall, our results show that phantom and ASFs can be accurately used in TPS for modern RT studies, and our ASFs can accurately scale whole-body CT-based anatomy.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/utgsbs_dissertations/1138"],"dc:subject":["Computational Phantoms","Late Effects","Pediatric Phantoms","Dose Reconstruction","Phantom Scaling","Scaling Factors","Biological and Chemical Physics","Medical Biophysics","Medicine and Health Sciences","Oncology","Other Medical Sciences","Other Physics","Pediatrics","Radiation Medicine"],"dc:title":["Advancement of A 3D Computational Phantom and Its Age Scaling Methodologies For Retrospective Dose Reconstruction Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis (MS)"],"thesis:degree_name":["Masters of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:49:23Z"}