{"id":{"repo_id":"utc","oai_identifier":"oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2112"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/utc/oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2112","repository":{"repo_id":"utc","name":"University of Tennessee - Chattanooga","base_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"False memories and false eyewitness identifications: are they related?","abstract":"Memory errors have become a topic of interest to psychologists in many areas. The present study asked if two types of errors of commission were based on the same mechanism, increasing the utility of findings in each area. The Deese/RoedigerMcDermott false memory paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) and the unconscious transference eyewitness identification paradigm (Ross, Ceci, Dunning, & Toglia, 1994) represent two tasks in which memory errors occur. Numerous studies exist examining each of these, few if any exist that examine the relationship between false memories and false eyewitness identifications. The current study therefore, utilized tasks from each of the two paradigms in an attempt to determine if a relationship existed. It was hypothesized participants highly susceptible to false memories would be more apt to make false eyewitness identifications than less susceptible subjects. Analyses revealed no relationship between the two tasks. Results are discussed in terms of the underlying mechanisms responsible for these two errors.","abstract_html":"Memory errors have become a topic of interest to psychologists in many areas. The present study asked if two types of errors of commission were based on the same mechanism, increasing the utility of findings in each area. The Deese/RoedigerMcDermott false memory paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) and the unconscious transference eyewitness identification paradigm (Ross, Ceci, Dunning, & Toglia, 1994) represent two tasks in which memory errors occur. Numerous studies exist examining each of these, few if any exist that examine the relationship between false memories and false eyewitness identifications. The current study therefore, utilized tasks from each of the two paradigms in an attempt to determine if a relationship existed. It was hypothesized participants highly susceptible to false memories would be more apt to make false eyewitness identifications than less susceptible subjects. Analyses revealed no relationship between the two tasks. Results are discussed in terms of the underlying mechanisms responsible for these two errors.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Price, Jodi Leigh"],"institution":"University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Metzger, Richard L.","College of Arts and Sciences"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"","date_published":null,"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:21Z","subjects":["Eyewitness identification","False memory syndrome"],"languages":["English","eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["LB2369.2 .P742 2001"],"render_values":[{"text":"LB2369.2 .P742 2001","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/933","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Metzger, Richard L.","College of Arts and Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Price, Jodi Leigh"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2001-05-01T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Masters theses","Text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Eyewitness identification","False memory syndrome"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["LB2369.2 .P742 2001","https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/933"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Dept. of Psychology","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Memory errors have become a topic of interest to psychologists in many areas. The present study asked if two types of errors of commission were based on the same mechanism, increasing the utility of findings in each area. The Deese/RoedigerMcDermott false memory paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) and the unconscious transference eyewitness identification paradigm (Ross, Ceci, Dunning, & Toglia, 1994) represent two tasks in which memory errors occur. Numerous studies exist examining each of these, few if any exist that examine the relationship between false memories and false eyewitness identifications. The current study therefore, utilized tasks from each of the two paradigms in an attempt to determine if a relationship existed. It was hypothesized participants highly susceptible to false memories would be more apt to make false eyewitness identifications than less susceptible subjects. Analyses revealed no relationship between the two tasks. Results are discussed in terms of the underlying mechanisms responsible for these two errors."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["False memories and false eyewitness identifications: are they related?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Metzger, Richard L.","College of Arts and Sciences"],"dc:creator":["Price, Jodi Leigh"],"dc:date":["2001-05-01T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description":["Dept. of Psychology","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."],"dc:description.abstract":["Memory errors have become a topic of interest to psychologists in many areas. The present study asked if two types of errors of commission were based on the same mechanism, increasing the utility of findings in each area. The Deese/RoedigerMcDermott false memory paradigm (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995) and the unconscious transference eyewitness identification paradigm (Ross, Ceci, Dunning, & Toglia, 1994) represent two tasks in which memory errors occur. Numerous studies exist examining each of these, few if any exist that examine the relationship between false memories and false eyewitness identifications. The current study therefore, utilized tasks from each of the two paradigms in an attempt to determine if a relationship existed. It was hypothesized participants highly susceptible to false memories would be more apt to make false eyewitness identifications than less susceptible subjects. Analyses revealed no relationship between the two tasks. Results are discussed in terms of the underlying mechanisms responsible for these two errors."],"dc:identifier":["LB2369.2 .P742 2001","https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/933"],"dc:language":["English","eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"],"dc:relation":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Eyewitness identification","False memory syndrome"],"dc:title":["False memories and false eyewitness identifications: are they related?"],"dc:type":["Masters theses","Text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:21Z"}