{"id":{"repo_id":"utc","oai_identifier":"oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2022"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/utc/oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2022","repository":{"repo_id":"utc","name":"University of Tennessee - Chattanooga","base_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Examining the quality of gender measurements in criminological and criminal justice research: pervasive apathy or bad research methods?","abstract":"Criminology has often been criticized for its lack of gender inclusivity and ‘androcentrism,’ particularly by feminist and queer criminologists who note that the field rarely uses separate measures of gender and sex assigned at birth or ones that extend beyond the binary, severely limiting the applicability of evidence-based, gender-responsive services in the criminal justice system. Other fields have adopted measures of gender that capture multiple identities and acknowledge the complexity of gender. However, it is unclear whether criminology has heeded these calls for inclusivity. Using a gender theory perspective, the current study analyzed 566 articles published between 2011 and 2020 from four criminological and criminal justice (CCJ) journals to explore the published studies’ gender operationalizations. Findings indicate that quality gender measurements are lacking, gender and sex assigned at birth are often conflated, and author and publication type are significant with regards to the inclusion of quality gender measurements.","abstract_html":"Criminology has often been criticized for its lack of gender inclusivity and ‘androcentrism,’ particularly by feminist and queer criminologists who note that the field rarely uses separate measures of gender and sex assigned at birth or ones that extend beyond the binary, severely limiting the applicability of evidence-based, gender-responsive services in the criminal justice system. Other fields have adopted measures of gender that capture multiple identities and acknowledge the complexity of gender. However, it is unclear whether criminology has heeded these calls for inclusivity. Using a gender theory perspective, the current study analyzed 566 articles published between 2011 and 2020 from four criminological and criminal justice (CCJ) journals to explore the published studies’ gender operationalizations. Findings indicate that quality gender measurements are lacking, gender and sex assigned at birth are often conflated, and author and publication type are significant with regards to the inclusion of quality gender measurements.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Clark, Jadon"],"institution":"University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Crittenden, Courtney A.","Hancock, Katelyn P.; Policastro, Christina N.","College of Arts and Sciences"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"","date_published":null,"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:13Z","subjects":["Criminology--Research--Methodology","Criminal justice, Administration of--Research--Methodology"],"languages":["English","eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/844","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Crittenden, Courtney A.","Hancock, Katelyn P.; Policastro, Christina N.","College of Arts and Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Clark, Jadon"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2023-12-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Masters theses","Text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Criminology--Research--Methodology","Criminal justice, Administration of--Research--Methodology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/844"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Dept. of Criminal Justice and Legal Assistant Studies","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Criminology has often been criticized for its lack of gender inclusivity and ‘androcentrism,’ particularly by feminist and queer criminologists who note that the field rarely uses separate measures of gender and sex assigned at birth or ones that extend beyond the binary, severely limiting the applicability of evidence-based, gender-responsive services in the criminal justice system. Other fields have adopted measures of gender that capture multiple identities and acknowledge the complexity of gender. However, it is unclear whether criminology has heeded these calls for inclusivity. Using a gender theory perspective, the current study analyzed 566 articles published between 2011 and 2020 from four criminological and criminal justice (CCJ) journals to explore the published studies’ gender operationalizations. Findings indicate that quality gender measurements are lacking, gender and sex assigned at birth are often conflated, and author and publication type are significant with regards to the inclusion of quality gender measurements."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Examining the quality of gender measurements in criminological and criminal justice research: pervasive apathy or bad research methods?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Crittenden, Courtney A.","Hancock, Katelyn P.; Policastro, Christina N.","College of Arts and Sciences"],"dc:creator":["Clark, Jadon"],"dc:date":["2023-12-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description":["Dept. of Criminal Justice and Legal Assistant Studies","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."],"dc:description.abstract":["Criminology has often been criticized for its lack of gender inclusivity and ‘androcentrism,’ particularly by feminist and queer criminologists who note that the field rarely uses separate measures of gender and sex assigned at birth or ones that extend beyond the binary, severely limiting the applicability of evidence-based, gender-responsive services in the criminal justice system. Other fields have adopted measures of gender that capture multiple identities and acknowledge the complexity of gender. However, it is unclear whether criminology has heeded these calls for inclusivity. Using a gender theory perspective, the current study analyzed 566 articles published between 2011 and 2020 from four criminological and criminal justice (CCJ) journals to explore the published studies’ gender operationalizations. Findings indicate that quality gender measurements are lacking, gender and sex assigned at birth are often conflated, and author and publication type are significant with regards to the inclusion of quality gender measurements."],"dc:identifier":["https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/844"],"dc:language":["English","eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"],"dc:relation":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Criminology--Research--Methodology","Criminal justice, Administration of--Research--Methodology"],"dc:title":["Examining the quality of gender measurements in criminological and criminal justice research: pervasive apathy or bad research methods?"],"dc:type":["Masters theses","Text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:13Z"}