Back to results

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Suspicious or autistic? evaluating responses to a behavioral analysis interview

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The Behavioral Analysis Interview (BAI) of the Reid Interrogation technique (Inbau, et al., 2013) consists of 15 questions to identify deception or truthfulness. Research indicates these cues are unreliable and trained officers are no better than chance at detecting deception (Kassin, Meissner & Norwick, 2005; Meissner & Kassin, 2002). This study aimed to examine how innocent autistic individuals’ response to the BAI in a mock arson case were perceived. College psychology students (n=218) rated the truthfulness/deceptiveness reading one of the two responses, with half informed of the diagnosis. Overall, the responses were rated as more deceptive when the suspect was not identified as autistic. Undisclosed autism led to higher ratings of deception, particularly when response contained nonverbal cues like long pauses or lacking eye contact. This research highlights the need for interview criteria adjustments for individuals with autism to prevent misinterpreting their innocent responses.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Jackson, Kendall
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Warren, Amye
  • Buck, Dave; Shelton, Jill T.
  • College of Arts and Sciences

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

dc:rights
Language dc:language
English, eng

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/831
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2006

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Tennessee - Chattanooga
Base URL
scholar.utc.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Jackson, Kendall. Suspicious or autistic? evaluating responses to a behavioral analysis interview. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/831