University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Suspicious or autistic? evaluating responses to a behavioral analysis interview
Abstract
dc:description.abstractThe Behavioral Analysis Interview (BAI) of the Reid Interrogation technique (Inbau, et al., 2013) consists of 15 questions to identify deception or truthfulness. Research indicates these cues are unreliable and trained officers are no better than chance at detecting deception (Kassin, Meissner & Norwick, 2005; Meissner & Kassin, 2002). This study aimed to examine how innocent autistic individuals’ response to the BAI in a mock arson case were perceived. College psychology students (n=218) rated the truthfulness/deceptiveness reading one of the two responses, with half informed of the diagnosis. Overall, the responses were rated as more deceptive when the suspect was not identified as autistic. Undisclosed autism led to higher ratings of deception, particularly when response contained nonverbal cues like long pauses or lacking eye contact. This research highlights the need for interview criteria adjustments for individuals with autism to prevent misinterpreting their innocent responses.
Degree
thesis:*- Grantor dc:publisher
- University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Jackson, Kendall
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Warren, Amye
- Buck, Dave; Shelton, Jill T.
- College of Arts and Sciences
Subjects
dc:subject × 2Rights
dc:rights- Language dc:language
- English, eng
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/831
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2006