{"id":{"repo_id":"utc","oai_identifier":"oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2004"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/utc/oai:scholar.utc.edu:theses-2004","repository":{"repo_id":"utc","name":"University of Tennessee - Chattanooga","base_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The ecological validity of prospective memory experimentation","abstract":"Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to remember and fulfill future intentions, a crucial ability in everyday life. Discrepancies between performance in standard laboratory tasks versus naturalistic tasks has led to translational concerns to everyday life. Validity concerns surrounding laboratory PM tasks have been raised due to the lack of relationship between PM performance and measures of strategic monitoring, which is believed to be how much attention participants dedicate to the PM task. The present study (N=82) compares an eye tracking task, a standard laboratory task, and a naturalistic task. The findings support previous research indicating that performance in laboratory PM tasks is not a good predictor of performance in everyday life. Notably, both the eye tracking and standard laboratory tasks demonstrate a correlation between strategic monitoring and PM accuracy. Finally, participants were better at predicting their PM performance on each laboratory task but were overconfident in the naturalistic task.","abstract_html":"Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to remember and fulfill future intentions, a crucial ability in everyday life. Discrepancies between performance in standard laboratory tasks versus naturalistic tasks has led to translational concerns to everyday life. Validity concerns surrounding laboratory PM tasks have been raised due to the lack of relationship between PM performance and measures of strategic monitoring, which is believed to be how much attention participants dedicate to the PM task. The present study (N=82) compares an eye tracking task, a standard laboratory task, and a naturalistic task. The findings support previous research indicating that performance in laboratory PM tasks is not a good predictor of performance in everyday life. Notably, both the eye tracking and standard laboratory tasks demonstrate a correlation between strategic monitoring and PM accuracy. Finally, participants were better at predicting their PM performance on each laboratory task but were overconfident in the naturalistic task.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pusser, Anna"],"institution":"University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Shelton, Jill Talley","Madden, Julie; Clark, Amanda","College of Arts and Sciences"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"","date_published":null,"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:13Z","subjects":["Prospective memory","Metacognition","Planning--Ability testing"],"languages":["English","eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/830","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Shelton, Jill Talley","Madden, Julie; Clark, Amanda","College of Arts and Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pusser, Anna"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2023-08-01T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"]},{"key":"dc:relation","label":"Dc Relation","values":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Masters theses","Text"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Prospective memory","Metacognition","Planning--Ability testing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English","eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/830"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Dept. of Psychology","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to remember and fulfill future intentions, a crucial ability in everyday life. Discrepancies between performance in standard laboratory tasks versus naturalistic tasks has led to translational concerns to everyday life. Validity concerns surrounding laboratory PM tasks have been raised due to the lack of relationship between PM performance and measures of strategic monitoring, which is believed to be how much attention participants dedicate to the PM task. The present study (N=82) compares an eye tracking task, a standard laboratory task, and a naturalistic task. The findings support previous research indicating that performance in laboratory PM tasks is not a good predictor of performance in everyday life. Notably, both the eye tracking and standard laboratory tasks demonstrate a correlation between strategic monitoring and PM accuracy. Finally, participants were better at predicting their PM performance on each laboratory task but were overconfident in the naturalistic task."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The ecological validity of prospective memory experimentation"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Shelton, Jill Talley","Madden, Julie; Clark, Amanda","College of Arts and Sciences"],"dc:creator":["Pusser, Anna"],"dc:date":["2023-08-01T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description":["Dept. of Psychology","M. S.; A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science."],"dc:description.abstract":["Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to remember and fulfill future intentions, a crucial ability in everyday life. Discrepancies between performance in standard laboratory tasks versus naturalistic tasks has led to translational concerns to everyday life. Validity concerns surrounding laboratory PM tasks have been raised due to the lack of relationship between PM performance and measures of strategic monitoring, which is believed to be how much attention participants dedicate to the PM task. The present study (N=82) compares an eye tracking task, a standard laboratory task, and a naturalistic task. The findings support previous research indicating that performance in laboratory PM tasks is not a good predictor of performance in everyday life. Notably, both the eye tracking and standard laboratory tasks demonstrate a correlation between strategic monitoring and PM accuracy. Finally, participants were better at predicting their PM performance on each laboratory task but were overconfident in the naturalistic task."],"dc:identifier":["https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/830"],"dc:language":["English","eng"],"dc:publisher":["University of Tennessee at Chattanooga","Chattanooga (Tenn.)"],"dc:relation":["Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:subject":["Prospective memory","Metacognition","Planning--Ability testing"],"dc:title":["The ecological validity of prospective memory experimentation"],"dc:type":["Masters theses","Text"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:47:13Z"}