{"id":{"repo_id":"usm","oai_identifier":"oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-2212"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/usm/oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-2212","repository":{"repo_id":"usm","name":"University of Southern Mississippi","base_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Intellectual Networks and Royal Legitimacy: Religious Intellectuals and English Kings Between Conversion and the Rise of Wessex","abstract":"<p>The early Middles Ages were a politically unstable period in Western Europe. No single king had a secure claim to the legitimacy of their rule, with usurption and military conquest making claims to legitimacy difficult to defend. England between the Augustinian mission (ca. 597) and the rule of Alfred the Great (ending in 899) was no exception. For the kings of this period, mere wealth and military strength had limited effect on this issue. Tying themselves to the religious intellectual networks that developed in the aftermath of conversion to create moral and intellectual apologetics for their rule took its place. These networks of intellectuals, whom Peter Brown refers to as <em>sapientes,</em> were almost entirely of monastic backgrounds. These scholars utilized the religious framework of their educations to write texts and shape practice to create narratives of legitimacy for their patrons. This practice would be refined during the rise of the Carolingians where Charlemagne deliberately created networks of <em>sapientes</em> rather than recruit individuals to tap into preexisting networks. This then enabled him to recruit talent from a much broader set of territory (including England itself), bringing together the best and brightest minds to bolster his legitimacy. For the <em>sapientes</em> themselves, they gained preferred appointments as abbots and bishops, bolstering their religious authority in order that they might better bolster their kings’ religious authority. This symbiotic relationship between royal and ecclesiastic authority enabled the kings of this period to create narratives of legitimacy by borrowing it from heaven.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;The early Middles Ages were a politically unstable period in Western Europe. No single king had a secure claim to the legitimacy of their rule, with usurption and military conquest making claims to legitimacy difficult to defend. England between the Augustinian mission (ca. 597) and the rule of Alfred the Great (ending in 899) was no exception. For the kings of this period, mere wealth and military strength had limited effect on this issue. Tying themselves to the religious intellectual networks that developed in the aftermath of conversion to create moral and intellectual apologetics for their rule took its place. These networks of intellectuals, whom Peter Brown refers to as &lt;em&gt;sapientes,&lt;/em&gt; were almost entirely of monastic backgrounds. These scholars utilized the religious framework of their educations to write texts and shape practice to create narratives of legitimacy for their patrons. This practice would be refined during the rise of the Carolingians where Charlemagne deliberately created networks of &lt;em&gt;sapientes&lt;/em&gt; rather than recruit individuals to tap into preexisting networks. This then enabled him to recruit talent from a much broader set of territory (including England itself), bringing together the best and brightest minds to bolster his legitimacy. For the &lt;em&gt;sapientes&lt;/em&gt; themselves, they gained preferred appointments as abbots and bishops, bolstering their religious authority in order that they might better bolster their kings’ religious authority. This symbiotic relationship between royal and ecclesiastic authority enabled the kings of this period to create narratives of legitimacy by borrowing it from heaven.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Brockway, Benjamin E"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts (MA)","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Courtney Luckhardt","Leah Pope Parker","Katya Maslakowski"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025-08-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2025-08-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:47Z","subjects":["Kingship","Early Medieval England","Religious Intellectuals","Monastics","Legitimacy","European History","History of Religion","Intellectual History","Medieval History","Political History"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/1124","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Courtney Luckhardt","Leah Pope Parker","Katya Maslakowski"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Brockway, Benjamin E"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2125-08-01T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (MA)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Kingship","Early Medieval England","Religious Intellectuals","Monastics","Legitimacy","European History","History of Religion","Intellectual History","Medieval History","Political History"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/1124"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>The early Middles Ages were a politically unstable period in Western Europe. No single king had a secure claim to the legitimacy of their rule, with usurption and military conquest making claims to legitimacy difficult to defend. England between the Augustinian mission (ca. 597) and the rule of Alfred the Great (ending in 899) was no exception. For the kings of this period, mere wealth and military strength had limited effect on this issue. Tying themselves to the religious intellectual networks that developed in the aftermath of conversion to create moral and intellectual apologetics for their rule took its place. These networks of intellectuals, whom Peter Brown refers to as <em>sapientes,</em> were almost entirely of monastic backgrounds. These scholars utilized the religious framework of their educations to write texts and shape practice to create narratives of legitimacy for their patrons. This practice would be refined during the rise of the Carolingians where Charlemagne deliberately created networks of <em>sapientes</em> rather than recruit individuals to tap into preexisting networks. This then enabled him to recruit talent from a much broader set of territory (including England itself), bringing together the best and brightest minds to bolster his legitimacy. For the <em>sapientes</em> themselves, they gained preferred appointments as abbots and bishops, bolstering their religious authority in order that they might better bolster their kings’ religious authority. This symbiotic relationship between royal and ecclesiastic authority enabled the kings of this period to create narratives of legitimacy by borrowing it from heaven.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Intellectual Networks and Royal Legitimacy: Religious Intellectuals and English Kings Between Conversion and the Rise of Wessex"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Courtney Luckhardt","Leah Pope Parker","Katya Maslakowski"],"dc:creator":["Brockway, Benjamin E"],"dc:date.available":["2125-08-01T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>The early Middles Ages were a politically unstable period in Western Europe. No single king had a secure claim to the legitimacy of their rule, with usurption and military conquest making claims to legitimacy difficult to defend. England between the Augustinian mission (ca. 597) and the rule of Alfred the Great (ending in 899) was no exception. For the kings of this period, mere wealth and military strength had limited effect on this issue. Tying themselves to the religious intellectual networks that developed in the aftermath of conversion to create moral and intellectual apologetics for their rule took its place. These networks of intellectuals, whom Peter Brown refers to as <em>sapientes,</em> were almost entirely of monastic backgrounds. These scholars utilized the religious framework of their educations to write texts and shape practice to create narratives of legitimacy for their patrons. This practice would be refined during the rise of the Carolingians where Charlemagne deliberately created networks of <em>sapientes</em> rather than recruit individuals to tap into preexisting networks. This then enabled him to recruit talent from a much broader set of territory (including England itself), bringing together the best and brightest minds to bolster his legitimacy. For the <em>sapientes</em> themselves, they gained preferred appointments as abbots and bishops, bolstering their religious authority in order that they might better bolster their kings’ religious authority. This symbiotic relationship between royal and ecclesiastic authority enabled the kings of this period to create narratives of legitimacy by borrowing it from heaven.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/1124"],"dc:subject":["Kingship","Early Medieval England","Religious Intellectuals","Monastics","Legitimacy","European History","History of Religion","Intellectual History","Medieval History","Political History"],"dc:title":["Intellectual Networks and Royal Legitimacy: Religious Intellectuals and English Kings Between Conversion and the Rise of Wessex"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (MA)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:47Z"}