Humans are social animals, resulting in notable sensitivity to experiences of acceptance and rejection. This study extends existing research by considering whether rejection or acceptance based on identity uniquely influences reaffiliation interests. Participants recalled either an inclusionary or exclusionary experience (or a control state), which would have been based on their competency or identity. Following this experience, they indicated their interest in participating in virtual and in-person social activities. I hypothesized that identity-based rejection would foster an interest in reaffiliation through online activities due to the greater availability to join likeminded groups online compared to in person. Conversely, I hypothesized competency-based rejection participants would report a preference for face-to-face reaffiliation due to the elevated opportunities to demonstrate behavioral efficacy in-person. Contrary to predictions, competency-based acceptance elicited greater interest in face-to-face interaction than participants in other conditions. We discuss how competency-based acceptance may facilitate social confidence and risk-taking that translates to a preference in direct interaction with others.
","abstract_html":"<p>Humans are social animals, resulting in notable sensitivity to experiences of acceptance and rejection. This study extends existing research by considering whether rejection or acceptance based on identity uniquely influences reaffiliation interests. Participants recalled either an inclusionary or exclusionary experience (or a control state), which would have been based on their competency or identity. Following this experience, they indicated their interest in participating in virtual and in-person social activities. I hypothesized that identity-based rejection would foster an interest in reaffiliation through online activities due to the greater availability to join likeminded groups online compared to in person. Conversely, I hypothesized competency-based rejection participants would report a preference for face-to-face reaffiliation due to the elevated opportunities to demonstrate behavioral efficacy in-person. Contrary to predictions, competency-based acceptance elicited greater interest in face-to-face interaction than participants in other conditions. We discuss how competency-based acceptance may facilitate social confidence and risk-taking that translates to a preference in direct interaction with others.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Namuth, August"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Donald Sacco","Dr. Alen Hajnal","Dr. Mitch Brown"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2024-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:47Z","subjects":["Rejection","Reaffiliation","Competency","Identity","FTF","Virtual","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Personality and Social Contexts"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/1064","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Donald Sacco","Dr. Alen Hajnal","Dr. Mitch Brown"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Namuth, August"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2025-05-01T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Rejection","Reaffiliation","Competency","Identity","FTF","Virtual","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Personality and Social Contexts"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/1064"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Humans are social animals, resulting in notable sensitivity to experiences of acceptance and rejection. This study extends existing research by considering whether rejection or acceptance based on identity uniquely influences reaffiliation interests. Participants recalled either an inclusionary or exclusionary experience (or a control state), which would have been based on their competency or identity. Following this experience, they indicated their interest in participating in virtual and in-person social activities. I hypothesized that identity-based rejection would foster an interest in reaffiliation through online activities due to the greater availability to join likeminded groups online compared to in person. Conversely, I hypothesized competency-based rejection participants would report a preference for face-to-face reaffiliation due to the elevated opportunities to demonstrate behavioral efficacy in-person. Contrary to predictions, competency-based acceptance elicited greater interest in face-to-face interaction than participants in other conditions. We discuss how competency-based acceptance may facilitate social confidence and risk-taking that translates to a preference in direct interaction with others.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effects of Identity and Competency-Based Rejection and Acceptance on Online versus Face to Face Reaffiliation Preferences in Adults"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Donald Sacco","Dr. Alen Hajnal","Dr. Mitch Brown"],"dc:creator":["Namuth, August"],"dc:date.available":["2025-05-01T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Humans are social animals, resulting in notable sensitivity to experiences of acceptance and rejection. This study extends existing research by considering whether rejection or acceptance based on identity uniquely influences reaffiliation interests. Participants recalled either an inclusionary or exclusionary experience (or a control state), which would have been based on their competency or identity. Following this experience, they indicated their interest in participating in virtual and in-person social activities. I hypothesized that identity-based rejection would foster an interest in reaffiliation through online activities due to the greater availability to join likeminded groups online compared to in person. Conversely, I hypothesized competency-based rejection participants would report a preference for face-to-face reaffiliation due to the elevated opportunities to demonstrate behavioral efficacy in-person. Contrary to predictions, competency-based acceptance elicited greater interest in face-to-face interaction than participants in other conditions. We discuss how competency-based acceptance may facilitate social confidence and risk-taking that translates to a preference in direct interaction with others.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/1064"],"dc:subject":["Rejection","Reaffiliation","Competency","Identity","FTF","Virtual","Experimental Analysis of Behavior","Personality and Social Contexts"],"dc:title":["Effects of Identity and Competency-Based Rejection and Acceptance on Online versus Face to Face Reaffiliation Preferences in Adults"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:47Z"}