{"id":{"repo_id":"usm","oai_identifier":"oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-1852"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/usm/oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-1852","repository":{"repo_id":"usm","name":"University of Southern Mississippi","base_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Check-In/Check-Out: Effectiveness, Social Validity, and Design Standards","abstract":"<p>The present study serves to investigate the evidence-base for Check-in/Check-out (CICO), a widely used behavioral intervention. Fifty-two studies were included in the review and 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference was used to calculate an omnibus effect for CICO, which showed that CICO significantly improves student outcomes. Effect sizes were large for several dependent variables, including academic engagement, reduction in problem behaviors, percentage of points on a daily behavior report card, and reduction in internalizing behaviors. No moderators significantly explained variability within these relationships. Social validity was assessed across CICO studies and was reported to be high. Methodological rigor was also investigated across the CICO literature base and it was found that a large portion of studies did not meet design standards. Results are interpreted within the context of limitations and future directions.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;The present study serves to investigate the evidence-base for Check-in/Check-out (CICO), a widely used behavioral intervention. Fifty-two studies were included in the review and 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference was used to calculate an omnibus effect for CICO, which showed that CICO significantly improves student outcomes. Effect sizes were large for several dependent variables, including academic engagement, reduction in problem behaviors, percentage of points on a daily behavior report card, and reduction in internalizing behaviors. No moderators significantly explained variability within these relationships. Social validity was assessed across CICO studies and was reported to be high. Methodological rigor was also investigated across the CICO literature base and it was found that a large portion of studies did not meet design standards. Results are interpreted within the context of limitations and future directions.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Weaver, Caitlyn"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Arts (MA)","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Brad Dufrene","Dr. Crystal Taylor","Dr. Joe Olmi"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2021-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:19Z","subjects":["CICO","Behavior Interventions","Tier II","Check-In/Check-Out","School Psychology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/797","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Brad Dufrene","Dr. Crystal Taylor","Dr. Joe Olmi"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Weaver, Caitlyn"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2021-03-13T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (MA)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["CICO","Behavior Interventions","Tier II","Check-In/Check-Out","School Psychology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/797"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>The present study serves to investigate the evidence-base for Check-in/Check-out (CICO), a widely used behavioral intervention. Fifty-two studies were included in the review and 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference was used to calculate an omnibus effect for CICO, which showed that CICO significantly improves student outcomes. Effect sizes were large for several dependent variables, including academic engagement, reduction in problem behaviors, percentage of points on a daily behavior report card, and reduction in internalizing behaviors. No moderators significantly explained variability within these relationships. Social validity was assessed across CICO studies and was reported to be high. Methodological rigor was also investigated across the CICO literature base and it was found that a large portion of studies did not meet design standards. Results are interpreted within the context of limitations and future directions.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Meta-Analysis of Check-In/Check-Out: Effectiveness, Social Validity, and Design Standards"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Brad Dufrene","Dr. Crystal Taylor","Dr. Joe Olmi"],"dc:creator":["Weaver, Caitlyn"],"dc:date.available":["2021-03-13T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>The present study serves to investigate the evidence-base for Check-in/Check-out (CICO), a widely used behavioral intervention. Fifty-two studies were included in the review and 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference was used to calculate an omnibus effect for CICO, which showed that CICO significantly improves student outcomes. Effect sizes were large for several dependent variables, including academic engagement, reduction in problem behaviors, percentage of points on a daily behavior report card, and reduction in internalizing behaviors. No moderators significantly explained variability within these relationships. Social validity was assessed across CICO studies and was reported to be high. Methodological rigor was also investigated across the CICO literature base and it was found that a large portion of studies did not meet design standards. Results are interpreted within the context of limitations and future directions.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/797"],"dc:subject":["CICO","Behavior Interventions","Tier II","Check-In/Check-Out","School Psychology"],"dc:title":["A Meta-Analysis of Check-In/Check-Out: Effectiveness, Social Validity, and Design Standards"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (MA)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:19Z"}