{"id":{"repo_id":"usm","oai_identifier":"oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-1810"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/usm/oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-1810","repository":{"repo_id":"usm","name":"University of Southern Mississippi","base_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Effect of Constant Relative Growth Rate Versus Constant Specific Growth Rate on Oocystis SP","abstract":"<p>In this study, a strain of <em>Oocystis</em> sp. (S002) was grown using two different growth strategies at three different temperatures (15°C, 20°C, 25°C). One strategy (GS1) kept a constant specific growth rate (µ) and the other (GS2) kept a constant relative growth rate (µ/µ<sub>max</sub>). In both strategies, the cultures were grown following the protocols of a hybrid growth system. The Dilution Phase is an initial semi-continuous growth phase that involves daily dilutions until set growth criteria are met. Followed by a batch culture growth protocol where the cultures were diluted at the onset of the first day and left to grow for two days (Harvest Phase). Six replicates were grown with samples taken at Dilution and Harvest Phase to study any effects on the physiology of S002. In order to compare the biomass composition, the following analyses were done: CN content, the extracted chl <em>a</em> concentration, lipid concentration using Nile Red stain, and the ash free dry weight. The results of this study indicated that the cultures grown most likely did not undergo nutrient stress except during GS1 at 20°C. Given the results under these conditions, neither GS1 nor GS2 is better than the other at keeping the biomass composition steady across the temperatures or for increasing the biomass and lipid during Harvest Phase of 25°C. However, given the results of this study, GS1 is as effective as GS2 when used in the optimal temperature range of the algal species used for experiments under these conditions.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;In this study, a strain of &lt;em&gt;Oocystis&lt;/em&gt; sp. (S002) was grown using two different growth strategies at three different temperatures (15°C, 20°C, 25°C). One strategy (GS1) kept a constant specific growth rate (µ) and the other (GS2) kept a constant relative growth rate (µ/µ&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt;). In both strategies, the cultures were grown following the protocols of a hybrid growth system. The Dilution Phase is an initial semi-continuous growth phase that involves daily dilutions until set growth criteria are met. Followed by a batch culture growth protocol where the cultures were diluted at the onset of the first day and left to grow for two days (Harvest Phase). Six replicates were grown with samples taken at Dilution and Harvest Phase to study any effects on the physiology of S002. In order to compare the biomass composition, the following analyses were done: CN content, the extracted chl &lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt; concentration, lipid concentration using Nile Red stain, and the ash free dry weight. The results of this study indicated that the cultures grown most likely did not undergo nutrient stress except during GS1 at 20°C. Given the results under these conditions, neither GS1 nor GS2 is better than the other at keeping the biomass composition steady across the temperatures or for increasing the biomass and lipid during Harvest Phase of 25°C. However, given the results of this study, GS1 is as effective as GS2 when used in the optimal temperature range of the algal species used for experiments under these conditions.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Kriner, Rachel"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Donald G. Redalje","Dr. Denis Wiesenburg","Dr. Patrick Biber"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-08-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2020-08-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:19Z","subjects":["relative growth rate","specific growth rate","biofuels","Oocystis sp","Marine Biology","Science and Mathematics Education"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/759","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Donald G. Redalje","Dr. Denis Wiesenburg","Dr. Patrick Biber"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Kriner, Rachel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-06-18T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["relative growth rate","specific growth rate","biofuels","Oocystis sp","Marine Biology","Science and Mathematics Education"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/759"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>In this study, a strain of <em>Oocystis</em> sp. (S002) was grown using two different growth strategies at three different temperatures (15°C, 20°C, 25°C). One strategy (GS1) kept a constant specific growth rate (µ) and the other (GS2) kept a constant relative growth rate (µ/µ<sub>max</sub>). In both strategies, the cultures were grown following the protocols of a hybrid growth system. The Dilution Phase is an initial semi-continuous growth phase that involves daily dilutions until set growth criteria are met. Followed by a batch culture growth protocol where the cultures were diluted at the onset of the first day and left to grow for two days (Harvest Phase). Six replicates were grown with samples taken at Dilution and Harvest Phase to study any effects on the physiology of S002. In order to compare the biomass composition, the following analyses were done: CN content, the extracted chl <em>a</em> concentration, lipid concentration using Nile Red stain, and the ash free dry weight. The results of this study indicated that the cultures grown most likely did not undergo nutrient stress except during GS1 at 20°C. Given the results under these conditions, neither GS1 nor GS2 is better than the other at keeping the biomass composition steady across the temperatures or for increasing the biomass and lipid during Harvest Phase of 25°C. However, given the results of this study, GS1 is as effective as GS2 when used in the optimal temperature range of the algal species used for experiments under these conditions.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effect of Constant Relative Growth Rate Versus Constant Specific Growth Rate on Oocystis SP"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Donald G. Redalje","Dr. Denis Wiesenburg","Dr. Patrick Biber"],"dc:creator":["Kriner, Rachel"],"dc:date.available":["2020-06-18T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>In this study, a strain of <em>Oocystis</em> sp. (S002) was grown using two different growth strategies at three different temperatures (15°C, 20°C, 25°C). One strategy (GS1) kept a constant specific growth rate (µ) and the other (GS2) kept a constant relative growth rate (µ/µ<sub>max</sub>). In both strategies, the cultures were grown following the protocols of a hybrid growth system. The Dilution Phase is an initial semi-continuous growth phase that involves daily dilutions until set growth criteria are met. Followed by a batch culture growth protocol where the cultures were diluted at the onset of the first day and left to grow for two days (Harvest Phase). Six replicates were grown with samples taken at Dilution and Harvest Phase to study any effects on the physiology of S002. In order to compare the biomass composition, the following analyses were done: CN content, the extracted chl <em>a</em> concentration, lipid concentration using Nile Red stain, and the ash free dry weight. The results of this study indicated that the cultures grown most likely did not undergo nutrient stress except during GS1 at 20°C. Given the results under these conditions, neither GS1 nor GS2 is better than the other at keeping the biomass composition steady across the temperatures or for increasing the biomass and lipid during Harvest Phase of 25°C. However, given the results of this study, GS1 is as effective as GS2 when used in the optimal temperature range of the algal species used for experiments under these conditions.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/759"],"dc:subject":["relative growth rate","specific growth rate","biofuels","Oocystis sp","Marine Biology","Science and Mathematics Education"],"dc:title":["The Effect of Constant Relative Growth Rate Versus Constant Specific Growth Rate on Oocystis SP"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:19Z"}