Government New Deal farm policies of the 1930s changed the realities of farming and the landscape in Mississippi. This research endeavors to compare three farm communities created by New Deal legislation in the state: Hattiesburg, McComb, and Tupelo. The economic crisis that was the Great Depression created a highly politicized environment as citizens looked to the government for economic relief. A crisis this severe would require an exceptional effort to mitigate the economic hardships it created, in varying degrees, for millions of Americans. The actions of the federal government during the Great Depression were an interesting mix of paternalism, desperation, and experimentation. The paternalism of the New Deal demonstrates, to a degree, the lack of economic and political leverage of the subjects of this study, tenant farmers and sharecroppers. Herein lies one of the significant implications of this research. How did these underrepresented constituents fare with regard to government policy? The federal government purchased land and chose people to inhabit subsistence farm communities. This interaction, dictated by factors such as location, government requirements, individual knowledge, and economic conditions, reshaped the landscape. The government's creation of these communities and the individual homesteaders who participated left imprints on the landscape. My intent is to examine each of the three communities in the study area on the basis of variables which helped define them historically and to evaluate, to the extent possible, the changes wrought by this action on the contemporary landscape.
","abstract_html":"<p>Government New Deal farm policies of the 1930s changed the realities of farming and the landscape in Mississippi. This research endeavors to compare three farm communities created by New Deal legislation in the state: Hattiesburg, McComb, and Tupelo. The economic crisis that was the Great Depression created a highly politicized environment as citizens looked to the government for economic relief. A crisis this severe would require an exceptional effort to mitigate the economic hardships it created, in varying degrees, for millions of Americans. The actions of the federal government during the Great Depression were an interesting mix of paternalism, desperation, and experimentation. The paternalism of the New Deal demonstrates, to a degree, the lack of economic and political leverage of the subjects of this study, tenant farmers and sharecroppers. Herein lies one of the significant implications of this research. How did these underrepresented constituents fare with regard to government policy? The federal government purchased land and chose people to inhabit subsistence farm communities. This interaction, dictated by factors such as location, government requirements, individual knowledge, and economic conditions, reshaped the landscape. The government's creation of these communities and the individual homesteaders who participated left imprints on the landscape. My intent is to examine each of the three communities in the study area on the basis of variables which helped define them historically and to evaluate, to the extent possible, the changes wrought by this action on the contemporary landscape. </p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rhoads, Joy Delaine"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":"Geography and Geology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Joby Bass","Clifton Dixon","David Cochran"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-12-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2013-12-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:06Z","subjects":["Geography","Social and Behavioral Sciences"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/543","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Joby Bass","Clifton Dixon","David Cochran"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rhoads, Joy Delaine"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-11-16T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Geography and Geology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Geography","Social and Behavioral Sciences"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/543"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Government New Deal farm policies of the 1930s changed the realities of farming and the landscape in Mississippi. This research endeavors to compare three farm communities created by New Deal legislation in the state: Hattiesburg, McComb, and Tupelo. The economic crisis that was the Great Depression created a highly politicized environment as citizens looked to the government for economic relief. A crisis this severe would require an exceptional effort to mitigate the economic hardships it created, in varying degrees, for millions of Americans. The actions of the federal government during the Great Depression were an interesting mix of paternalism, desperation, and experimentation. The paternalism of the New Deal demonstrates, to a degree, the lack of economic and political leverage of the subjects of this study, tenant farmers and sharecroppers. Herein lies one of the significant implications of this research. How did these underrepresented constituents fare with regard to government policy? The federal government purchased land and chose people to inhabit subsistence farm communities. This interaction, dictated by factors such as location, government requirements, individual knowledge, and economic conditions, reshaped the landscape. The government's creation of these communities and the individual homesteaders who participated left imprints on the landscape. My intent is to examine each of the three communities in the study area on the basis of variables which helped define them historically and to evaluate, to the extent possible, the changes wrought by this action on the contemporary landscape.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Legislated Landscape: A Comparison of New Deal Farm Communities in Hattiesburg, McComb, and Tupelo, Mississippi"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Joby Bass","Clifton Dixon","David Cochran"],"dc:creator":["Rhoads, Joy Delaine"],"dc:date.available":["2018-11-16T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Government New Deal farm policies of the 1930s changed the realities of farming and the landscape in Mississippi. This research endeavors to compare three farm communities created by New Deal legislation in the state: Hattiesburg, McComb, and Tupelo. The economic crisis that was the Great Depression created a highly politicized environment as citizens looked to the government for economic relief. A crisis this severe would require an exceptional effort to mitigate the economic hardships it created, in varying degrees, for millions of Americans. The actions of the federal government during the Great Depression were an interesting mix of paternalism, desperation, and experimentation. The paternalism of the New Deal demonstrates, to a degree, the lack of economic and political leverage of the subjects of this study, tenant farmers and sharecroppers. Herein lies one of the significant implications of this research. How did these underrepresented constituents fare with regard to government policy? The federal government purchased land and chose people to inhabit subsistence farm communities. This interaction, dictated by factors such as location, government requirements, individual knowledge, and economic conditions, reshaped the landscape. The government's creation of these communities and the individual homesteaders who participated left imprints on the landscape. My intent is to examine each of the three communities in the study area on the basis of variables which helped define them historically and to evaluate, to the extent possible, the changes wrought by this action on the contemporary landscape.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/543"],"dc:subject":["Geography","Social and Behavioral Sciences"],"dc:title":["Legislated Landscape: A Comparison of New Deal Farm Communities in Hattiesburg, McComb, and Tupelo, Mississippi"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Geography and Geology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:45:06Z"}