Back to results

University of Southern Mississippi

Are Fingerprints Really Individualized Evidence? A Meta-Analytic Study

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>In recent years, there have been many academics that have challenged the legitimacy of fingerprints as a source of individualized evidence. They have also questioned the experts that analyze fingerprints and the methods they use. There have been recent cases where judges have questioned the foundation of fingerprinting and dismissed fingerprints as evidence. This meta-analytic study brings together opinions, cases, and studies that focus on the foundation, evolution, and technological advancements of fingerprinting.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science (MS)
Level thesis:degree_level
Masters Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Criminal Justice
Year dc:date.available
2013

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Barber, Jonathan Dillon
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Kuppareddi Balamurugan
  • Dean Bertram
  • John Bishop

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/396
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:aquila.usm.edu:masters_theses-1466

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Southern Mississippi
Base URL
aquila.usm.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Barber, Jonathan Dillon. Are Fingerprints Really Individualized Evidence? A Meta-Analytic Study. Masters Thesis thesis, 2013. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/396