{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc5108"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc5108","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Comparison of Discounting Parameters Obtained Through Two Different Adjusting Procedures: Bisection and Up-Down.","abstract":"The study compared delay discounting in adult humans using two different methods of adjustments. Both methods used hypothetical choices of monetary outcomes. One involved adjustments using a fixed sequence of ascending or descending amounts, the other used a bisection algorithm in which the changes in amounts varied as a function of the subjects' choices. Two magnitudes of delayed outcomes were used: $1,000 and $10,000. A within subject design was used to compare indifference curves and discounting measures across the two adjusting procedures. Twenty four subjects were divided in two groups and exposed to the procedures in opposite order, to account for sequence effects. Results from within subject comparisons showed no systematic differences between procedures.","abstract_html":"The study compared delay discounting in adult humans using two different methods of adjustments. Both methods used hypothetical choices of monetary outcomes. One involved adjustments using a fixed sequence of ascending or descending amounts, the other used a bisection algorithm in which the changes in amounts varied as a function of the subjects' choices. Two magnitudes of delayed outcomes were used: $1,000 and $10,000. A within subject design was used to compare indifference curves and discounting measures across the two adjusting procedures. Twenty four subjects were divided in two groups and exposed to the procedures in opposite order, to account for sequence effects. Results from within subject comparisons showed no systematic differences between procedures.","abstract_has_math":true,"creators":["Woelz, Thomas Anatol da Rocha"],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Vaidya, Manish","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-","Rosales Ruíz, Jesús"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2007,"date_issued":"2007-12","date_published":"2007-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["delay discounting","adjusting procedure","temporal discounting","fixed sequence","Economics -- Psychological aspects."],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Woelz, Thomas Anatol da Rocha","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 228503776","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5108/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc5108"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 228503776","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5108/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5108/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc5108","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc5108","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Vaidya, Manish","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-","Rosales Ruíz, Jesús"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Woelz, Thomas Anatol da Rocha"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2007-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["delay discounting","adjusting procedure","temporal discounting","fixed sequence","Economics -- Psychological aspects."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Woelz, Thomas Anatol da Rocha","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 228503776","doi: 10.12794/metadc5108","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5108/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc5108"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The study compared delay discounting in adult humans using two different methods of adjustments. Both methods used hypothetical choices of monetary outcomes. One involved adjustments using a fixed sequence of ascending or descending amounts, the other used a bisection algorithm in which the changes in amounts varied as a function of the subjects' choices. Two magnitudes of delayed outcomes were used: $1,000 and $10,000. A within subject design was used to compare indifference curves and discounting measures across the two adjusting procedures. Twenty four subjects were divided in two groups and exposed to the procedures in opposite order, to account for sequence effects. Results from within subject comparisons showed no systematic differences between procedures."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Comparison of Discounting Parameters Obtained Through Two Different Adjusting Procedures: Bisection and Up-Down."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Vaidya, Manish","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-","Rosales Ruíz, Jesús"],"dc:creator":["Woelz, Thomas Anatol da Rocha"],"dc:date":["2007-12"],"dc:description":["The study compared delay discounting in adult humans using two different methods of adjustments. Both methods used hypothetical choices of monetary outcomes. One involved adjustments using a fixed sequence of ascending or descending amounts, the other used a bisection algorithm in which the changes in amounts varied as a function of the subjects' choices. Two magnitudes of delayed outcomes were used: $1,000 and $10,000. A within subject design was used to compare indifference curves and discounting measures across the two adjusting procedures. Twenty four subjects were divided in two groups and exposed to the procedures in opposite order, to account for sequence effects. Results from within subject comparisons showed no systematic differences between procedures."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 228503776","doi: 10.12794/metadc5108","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc5108/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc5108"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Woelz, Thomas Anatol da Rocha","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["delay discounting","adjusting procedure","temporal discounting","fixed sequence","Economics -- Psychological aspects."],"dc:title":["A Comparison of Discounting Parameters Obtained Through Two Different Adjusting Procedures: Bisection and Up-Down."],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}