{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4841"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4841","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A within-subject comparison of stimulus equivalence training.","abstract":"Training structures have been defined as the order and arrangement of baseline conditional discriminations within stimulus equivalence training. The three training structures most often used are, linear (trains A:B and B:C discrimination), many-to-one (trains B:A and C:A discriminations) , and one-to-many (trains A:B and A:C discriminations). Each training structure trains a different set of simultaneous and successive discriminations that are then needed in the test for derived relations (symmetry, reflexivity, transitivity, and symmetrical transitivity). The present experiment seeks to extend the research on stimulus equivalence training structures by using a within-subject design and adult human subjects. Three sets of 9 arbitrary stimuli were trained concurrently each with a different training structure. From the beginning, training and testing trials were intermixed. The likelihood of producing stimulus equivalence formation was equal across structures.","abstract_html":"Training structures have been defined as the order and arrangement of baseline conditional discriminations within stimulus equivalence training. The three training structures most often used are, linear (trains A:B and B:C discrimination), many-to-one (trains B:A and C:A discriminations) , and one-to-many (trains A:B and A:C discriminations). Each training structure trains a different set of simultaneous and successive discriminations that are then needed in the test for derived relations (symmetry, reflexivity, transitivity, and symmetrical transitivity). The present experiment seeks to extend the research on stimulus equivalence training structures by using a within-subject design and adult human subjects. Three sets of 9 arbitrary stimuli were trained concurrently each with a different training structure. From the beginning, training and testing trials were intermixed. The likelihood of producing stimulus equivalence formation was equal across structures.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Rawls, Medea"],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Vaidya, Manish","Ellis, Janet","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-08","date_published":"2005-08","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Learning, Psychology of.","Discrimination learning.","training structures","stimulus equivalence","many-to-one","one-to-many","linear"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Rawls, Medea","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 68650187","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4841/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4841"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 68650187","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4841/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4841/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4841","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4841","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Vaidya, Manish","Ellis, Janet","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Rawls, Medea"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2005-08"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Learning, Psychology of.","Discrimination learning.","training structures","stimulus equivalence","many-to-one","one-to-many","linear"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Rawls, Medea","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 68650187","doi: 10.12794/metadc4841","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4841/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4841"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Training structures have been defined as the order and arrangement of baseline conditional discriminations within stimulus equivalence training. The three training structures most often used are, linear (trains A:B and B:C discrimination), many-to-one (trains B:A and C:A discriminations) , and one-to-many (trains A:B and A:C discriminations). Each training structure trains a different set of simultaneous and successive discriminations that are then needed in the test for derived relations (symmetry, reflexivity, transitivity, and symmetrical transitivity). The present experiment seeks to extend the research on stimulus equivalence training structures by using a within-subject design and adult human subjects. Three sets of 9 arbitrary stimuli were trained concurrently each with a different training structure. From the beginning, training and testing trials were intermixed. The likelihood of producing stimulus equivalence formation was equal across structures."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A within-subject comparison of stimulus equivalence training."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Vaidya, Manish","Ellis, Janet","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-"],"dc:creator":["Rawls, Medea"],"dc:date":["2005-08"],"dc:description":["Training structures have been defined as the order and arrangement of baseline conditional discriminations within stimulus equivalence training. The three training structures most often used are, linear (trains A:B and B:C discrimination), many-to-one (trains B:A and C:A discriminations) , and one-to-many (trains A:B and A:C discriminations). Each training structure trains a different set of simultaneous and successive discriminations that are then needed in the test for derived relations (symmetry, reflexivity, transitivity, and symmetrical transitivity). The present experiment seeks to extend the research on stimulus equivalence training structures by using a within-subject design and adult human subjects. Three sets of 9 arbitrary stimuli were trained concurrently each with a different training structure. From the beginning, training and testing trials were intermixed. The likelihood of producing stimulus equivalence formation was equal across structures."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 68650187","doi: 10.12794/metadc4841","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4841/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4841"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Rawls, Medea","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Learning, Psychology of.","Discrimination learning.","training structures","stimulus equivalence","many-to-one","one-to-many","linear"],"dc:title":["A within-subject comparison of stimulus equivalence training."],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}