{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4777"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4777","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Institutions and Drug Markets","abstract":"This thesis examines how drug policy and enforcement affect drug manufacturers. The approach taken is a comparative institutional analysis of cannabis and methamphetamine production. I focus on the effects of prohibition, privacy, and clandestine markets on producer behavior for these two drugs and the unintended consequences that result. I demonstrate that cannabis and methamphetamine producers both face substantial transaction costs and that producers alter their behavior to manage these transaction costs. I conclude that cannabis producers can adopt indoor, small-scale operations to hide their activity, which are capable of yielding continuous, high-potency crops. Methamphetamine producers also adopt small-scale, decentralized strategies, but commodity control increases their exposure and leads to greater overall transaction costs during the manufacturing process.","abstract_html":"This thesis examines how drug policy and enforcement affect drug manufacturers. The approach taken is a comparative institutional analysis of cannabis and methamphetamine production. I focus on the effects of prohibition, privacy, and clandestine markets on producer behavior for these two drugs and the unintended consequences that result. I demonstrate that cannabis and methamphetamine producers both face substantial transaction costs and that producers alter their behavior to manage these transaction costs. I conclude that cannabis producers can adopt indoor, small-scale operations to hide their activity, which are capable of yielding continuous, high-potency crops. Methamphetamine producers also adopt small-scale, decentralized strategies, but commodity control increases their exposure and leads to greater overall transaction costs during the manufacturing process.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Haddock, Billy Dean"],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Brandt, Patrick","VonDoepp, Peter","Poe, Steven"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-05","date_published":"2005-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Drug control -- United States.","Drug factories -- United States.","Cannabis -- United States.","Methamphetamine -- United States.","drug policy","institutions","illicit drugs","shadow economy","transaction costs"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Haddock, Billy Dean, Jr","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 62119752","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4777/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4777"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 62119752","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4777/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4777/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4777","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4777","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Brandt, Patrick","VonDoepp, Peter","Poe, Steven"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Haddock, Billy Dean"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2005-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Drug control -- United States.","Drug factories -- United States.","Cannabis -- United States.","Methamphetamine -- United States.","drug policy","institutions","illicit drugs","shadow economy","transaction costs"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Haddock, Billy Dean, Jr","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 62119752","doi: 10.12794/metadc4777","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4777/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4777"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis examines how drug policy and enforcement affect drug manufacturers. The approach taken is a comparative institutional analysis of cannabis and methamphetamine production. I focus on the effects of prohibition, privacy, and clandestine markets on producer behavior for these two drugs and the unintended consequences that result. I demonstrate that cannabis and methamphetamine producers both face substantial transaction costs and that producers alter their behavior to manage these transaction costs. I conclude that cannabis producers can adopt indoor, small-scale operations to hide their activity, which are capable of yielding continuous, high-potency crops. Methamphetamine producers also adopt small-scale, decentralized strategies, but commodity control increases their exposure and leads to greater overall transaction costs during the manufacturing process."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Institutions and Drug Markets"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Brandt, Patrick","VonDoepp, Peter","Poe, Steven"],"dc:creator":["Haddock, Billy Dean"],"dc:date":["2005-05"],"dc:description":["This thesis examines how drug policy and enforcement affect drug manufacturers. The approach taken is a comparative institutional analysis of cannabis and methamphetamine production. I focus on the effects of prohibition, privacy, and clandestine markets on producer behavior for these two drugs and the unintended consequences that result. I demonstrate that cannabis and methamphetamine producers both face substantial transaction costs and that producers alter their behavior to manage these transaction costs. I conclude that cannabis producers can adopt indoor, small-scale operations to hide their activity, which are capable of yielding continuous, high-potency crops. Methamphetamine producers also adopt small-scale, decentralized strategies, but commodity control increases their exposure and leads to greater overall transaction costs during the manufacturing process."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 62119752","doi: 10.12794/metadc4777","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4777/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4777"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Haddock, Billy Dean, Jr","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Drug control -- United States.","Drug factories -- United States.","Cannabis -- United States.","Methamphetamine -- United States.","drug policy","institutions","illicit drugs","shadow economy","transaction costs"],"dc:title":["Institutions and Drug Markets"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}