{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4741"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4741","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"An Examination of Methodological Rigor and Its Effects on Organizational Development and Change Outcomes","abstract":"Organizational development and change (ODC) is a broad field because change occurs in all organizations, occurs at multiple organizational levels, consists of numerous interventions, and can impact multiple outcomes. Many ODC efforts attempt to examine the effectiveness of their initiatives, yet fail to account for the quality, or rigor of their methods. The purpose of this paper is to examine how methodological rigor and intervention implementation quality impact ODC outcomes. The results indicate that overall methodological rigor is not a significant predictor of organizational change outcomes; however, several individual rigor criteria exhibit predictive power. Implementation quality is a significant predictor of organizational outcomes, but in a negative direction.","abstract_html":"Organizational development and change (ODC) is a broad field because change occurs in all organizations, occurs at multiple organizational levels, consists of numerous interventions, and can impact multiple outcomes. Many ODC efforts attempt to examine the effectiveness of their initiatives, yet fail to account for the quality, or rigor of their methods. The purpose of this paper is to examine how methodological rigor and intervention implementation quality impact ODC outcomes. The results indicate that overall methodological rigor is not a significant predictor of organizational change outcomes; however, several individual rigor criteria exhibit predictive power. Implementation quality is a significant predictor of organizational outcomes, but in a negative direction.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Alexander, Sandra G."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Huff, Joseph W.","Johnson, Douglas A.","Halfhill, Terry"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-05","date_published":"2005-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Organizational change.","interventions","methodological rigor","implementation quality","organizational change","meta-analysis"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Use restricted to UNT Community","Copyright","Alexander, Sandra G.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 62093638","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4741/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4741"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 62093638","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4741/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4741/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4741","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4741","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Huff, Joseph W.","Johnson, Douglas A.","Halfhill, Terry"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Alexander, Sandra G."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2005-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Organizational change.","interventions","methodological rigor","implementation quality","organizational change","meta-analysis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Use restricted to UNT Community","Copyright","Alexander, Sandra G.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 62093638","doi: 10.12794/metadc4741","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4741/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4741"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Organizational development and change (ODC) is a broad field because change occurs in all organizations, occurs at multiple organizational levels, consists of numerous interventions, and can impact multiple outcomes. Many ODC efforts attempt to examine the effectiveness of their initiatives, yet fail to account for the quality, or rigor of their methods. The purpose of this paper is to examine how methodological rigor and intervention implementation quality impact ODC outcomes. The results indicate that overall methodological rigor is not a significant predictor of organizational change outcomes; however, several individual rigor criteria exhibit predictive power. Implementation quality is a significant predictor of organizational outcomes, but in a negative direction."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["An Examination of Methodological Rigor and Its Effects on Organizational Development and Change Outcomes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Huff, Joseph W.","Johnson, Douglas A.","Halfhill, Terry"],"dc:creator":["Alexander, Sandra G."],"dc:date":["2005-05"],"dc:description":["Organizational development and change (ODC) is a broad field because change occurs in all organizations, occurs at multiple organizational levels, consists of numerous interventions, and can impact multiple outcomes. Many ODC efforts attempt to examine the effectiveness of their initiatives, yet fail to account for the quality, or rigor of their methods. The purpose of this paper is to examine how methodological rigor and intervention implementation quality impact ODC outcomes. The results indicate that overall methodological rigor is not a significant predictor of organizational change outcomes; however, several individual rigor criteria exhibit predictive power. Implementation quality is a significant predictor of organizational outcomes, but in a negative direction."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 62093638","doi: 10.12794/metadc4741","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4741/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4741"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Use restricted to UNT Community","Copyright","Alexander, Sandra G.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Organizational change.","interventions","methodological rigor","implementation quality","organizational change","meta-analysis"],"dc:title":["An Examination of Methodological Rigor and Its Effects on Organizational Development and Change Outcomes"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}