{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4650"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4650","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Appellate Recruitment Patterns in the Higher British Judiciary: 1850 - 1990","abstract":"This study seeks to advance the understanding of appellate promotion in the senior judiciary of Great Britain . It describes the population and attributes of judges who served in the British High Courts, Court of Appeal, and Appellate Committee of the House of Lords (i.e., Law Lords) from 1850 to 1990. It specifically builds upon the work of C. Neal Tate and tests his model of appellate recruitment on a larger and augmented database. The study determines that family status, previously asserted as having a large effect on recruitment to the appellate courts, is not as important as previously believed. It concludes that merit effects, professional norms, and institutional constraints offer equally satisfactory or better explanations of appellate recruitment patterns.","abstract_html":"This study seeks to advance the understanding of appellate promotion in the senior judiciary of Great Britain . It describes the population and attributes of judges who served in the British High Courts, Court of Appeal, and Appellate Committee of the House of Lords (i.e., Law Lords) from 1850 to 1990. It specifically builds upon the work of C. Neal Tate and tests his model of appellate recruitment on a larger and augmented database. The study determines that family status, previously asserted as having a large effect on recruitment to the appellate courts, is not as important as previously believed. It concludes that merit effects, professional norms, and institutional constraints offer equally satisfactory or better explanations of appellate recruitment patterns.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Thomas, Bruce K."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Booth, John A.","Books, John W.","Ditslear, Corey","Brandt, Patrick","Ruderman, Richard"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-12","date_published":"2004-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Judges -- Selection and appointment -- Great Britain.","family status","judges","High Courts","British judiciary","appellate recruitment"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Thomas, Bruce K.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 58652080","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4650/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4650"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 58652080","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4650/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4650/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4650","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4650","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Booth, John A.","Books, John W.","Ditslear, Corey","Brandt, Patrick","Ruderman, Richard"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Thomas, Bruce K."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2004-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Judges -- Selection and appointment -- Great Britain.","family status","judges","High Courts","British judiciary","appellate recruitment"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Thomas, Bruce K.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 58652080","doi: 10.12794/metadc4650","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4650/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4650"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This study seeks to advance the understanding of appellate promotion in the senior judiciary of Great Britain . It describes the population and attributes of judges who served in the British High Courts, Court of Appeal, and Appellate Committee of the House of Lords (i.e., Law Lords) from 1850 to 1990. It specifically builds upon the work of C. Neal Tate and tests his model of appellate recruitment on a larger and augmented database. The study determines that family status, previously asserted as having a large effect on recruitment to the appellate courts, is not as important as previously believed. It concludes that merit effects, professional norms, and institutional constraints offer equally satisfactory or better explanations of appellate recruitment patterns."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Appellate Recruitment Patterns in the Higher British Judiciary: 1850 - 1990"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Booth, John A.","Books, John W.","Ditslear, Corey","Brandt, Patrick","Ruderman, Richard"],"dc:creator":["Thomas, Bruce K."],"dc:date":["2004-12"],"dc:description":["This study seeks to advance the understanding of appellate promotion in the senior judiciary of Great Britain . It describes the population and attributes of judges who served in the British High Courts, Court of Appeal, and Appellate Committee of the House of Lords (i.e., Law Lords) from 1850 to 1990. It specifically builds upon the work of C. Neal Tate and tests his model of appellate recruitment on a larger and augmented database. The study determines that family status, previously asserted as having a large effect on recruitment to the appellate courts, is not as important as previously believed. It concludes that merit effects, professional norms, and institutional constraints offer equally satisfactory or better explanations of appellate recruitment patterns."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 58652080","doi: 10.12794/metadc4650","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4650/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4650"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Thomas, Bruce K.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Judges -- Selection and appointment -- Great Britain.","family status","judges","High Courts","British judiciary","appellate recruitment"],"dc:title":["Appellate Recruitment Patterns in the Higher British Judiciary: 1850 - 1990"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}