{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4616"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4616","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Multiple-Respondent Anecdotal Assessments for Behavior Disorders: An Analysis of Interrater Agreement and Correspondence With Functional Analysis Outcomes","abstract":"An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments and correspondence between functional analysis outcomes was completed. Experiment I evaluated overall agreement among multiple respondents (direct-care staff) on the hypothesized function of each residents (28 adults with mental retardation) problematic behavior using the Motivational Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). Results of the questionnaires indicated that respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior for 10 of the 28 residents. Experiment II examined whether, for selected cases in which 4 out of 5 respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior, correspondence occurred between functional analyses and anecdotal assessments outcomes. Two of the 6 functional analyses did not evoke the problematic behavior. However, 4 functional analyses did produce corresponding outcomes suggesting that, when the functional analyses produced interpretable data, the results of the functional analyses corresponded with those of the anecdotal assessments.","abstract_html":"An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments and correspondence between functional analysis outcomes was completed. Experiment I evaluated overall agreement among multiple respondents (direct-care staff) on the hypothesized function of each residents (28 adults with mental retardation) problematic behavior using the Motivational Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). Results of the questionnaires indicated that respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior for 10 of the 28 residents. Experiment II examined whether, for selected cases in which 4 out of 5 respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior, correspondence occurred between functional analyses and anecdotal assessments outcomes. Two of the 6 functional analyses did not evoke the problematic behavior. However, 4 functional analyses did produce corresponding outcomes suggesting that, when the functional analyses produced interpretable data, the results of the functional analyses corresponded with those of the anecdotal assessments.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fahrenholz, Anney Renee"],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Smith, Richard","Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla","Ellis, Janet"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-08","date_published":"2004-08","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["People with mental disabilities -- Mental health.","People with disabilities -- Functional assessment.","Behavioral assessment.","anecdotal assessment","Motivational Assessment Scale","interrater agreement","Functional Analysis Screening Tool"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Fahrenholz, Anney Renee","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 56621352","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4616/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4616"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 56621352","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4616/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4616/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4616","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4616","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Smith, Richard","Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla","Ellis, Janet"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fahrenholz, Anney Renee"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2004-08"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["People with mental disabilities -- Mental health.","People with disabilities -- Functional assessment.","Behavioral assessment.","anecdotal assessment","Motivational Assessment Scale","interrater agreement","Functional Analysis Screening Tool"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Fahrenholz, Anney Renee","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 56621352","doi: 10.12794/metadc4616","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4616/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4616"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments and correspondence between functional analysis outcomes was completed. Experiment I evaluated overall agreement among multiple respondents (direct-care staff) on the hypothesized function of each residents (28 adults with mental retardation) problematic behavior using the Motivational Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). Results of the questionnaires indicated that respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior for 10 of the 28 residents. Experiment II examined whether, for selected cases in which 4 out of 5 respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior, correspondence occurred between functional analyses and anecdotal assessments outcomes. Two of the 6 functional analyses did not evoke the problematic behavior. However, 4 functional analyses did produce corresponding outcomes suggesting that, when the functional analyses produced interpretable data, the results of the functional analyses corresponded with those of the anecdotal assessments."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Multiple-Respondent Anecdotal Assessments for Behavior Disorders: An Analysis of Interrater Agreement and Correspondence With Functional Analysis Outcomes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Smith, Richard","Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla","Ellis, Janet"],"dc:creator":["Fahrenholz, Anney Renee"],"dc:date":["2004-08"],"dc:description":["An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments and correspondence between functional analysis outcomes was completed. Experiment I evaluated overall agreement among multiple respondents (direct-care staff) on the hypothesized function of each residents (28 adults with mental retardation) problematic behavior using the Motivational Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). Results of the questionnaires indicated that respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior for 10 of the 28 residents. Experiment II examined whether, for selected cases in which 4 out of 5 respondents agreed on the function of the problematic behavior, correspondence occurred between functional analyses and anecdotal assessments outcomes. Two of the 6 functional analyses did not evoke the problematic behavior. However, 4 functional analyses did produce corresponding outcomes suggesting that, when the functional analyses produced interpretable data, the results of the functional analyses corresponded with those of the anecdotal assessments."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 56621352","doi: 10.12794/metadc4616","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4616/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4616"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Fahrenholz, Anney Renee","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["People with mental disabilities -- Mental health.","People with disabilities -- Functional assessment.","Behavioral assessment.","anecdotal assessment","Motivational Assessment Scale","interrater agreement","Functional Analysis Screening Tool"],"dc:title":["Multiple-Respondent Anecdotal Assessments for Behavior Disorders: An Analysis of Interrater Agreement and Correspondence With Functional Analysis Outcomes"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}