{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4533"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4533","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Analysis of Leadership Perceptions Using Multirater Feedback.","abstract":"Performance improvement intervention begins with assessment. How that assessment is interpreted can mean the difference between success and failure. Previous research of 360-degree feedback instruments has tried to reconcile the differences between multiple rater groups. Rather than searching for agreement, this research proposes to understand the meaning of the differences using multirater feedback. Individuals determine ratings based upon their own perspective and building upon the understanding of rater perspective may result in improved assessments. Data from an existing data set was processed using a second-order CFA in structural equation modeling. Covariance between the second-order factors and rater groups determined the difference in how each rater group perceived the leader.","abstract_html":"Performance improvement intervention begins with assessment. How that assessment is interpreted can mean the difference between success and failure. Previous research of 360-degree feedback instruments has tried to reconcile the differences between multiple rater groups. Rather than searching for agreement, this research proposes to understand the meaning of the differences using multirater feedback. Individuals determine ratings based upon their own perspective and building upon the understanding of rater perspective may result in improved assessments. Data from an existing data set was processed using a second-order CFA in structural equation modeling. Covariance between the second-order factors and rater groups determined the difference in how each rater group perceived the leader.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bradley, Thomas P."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Allen, Jeff M.","Huff, Joseph W.","Schumacker, Randall E.","Wircenski, Jerry L."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-05","date_published":"2004-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Leadership.","Feedback (Psychology)","Executives -- Rating of.","rater perspective","leadership perceptions","multirater feedback","360 degree feedback","confirmatory factor analysis"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Bradley, Thomas P.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 55874124","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4533/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4533"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 55874124","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4533/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4533/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4533","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4533","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Allen, Jeff M.","Huff, Joseph W.","Schumacker, Randall E.","Wircenski, Jerry L."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bradley, Thomas P."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2004-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Leadership.","Feedback (Psychology)","Executives -- Rating of.","rater perspective","leadership perceptions","multirater feedback","360 degree feedback","confirmatory factor analysis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Bradley, Thomas P.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 55874124","doi: 10.12794/metadc4533","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4533/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4533"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Performance improvement intervention begins with assessment. How that assessment is interpreted can mean the difference between success and failure. Previous research of 360-degree feedback instruments has tried to reconcile the differences between multiple rater groups. Rather than searching for agreement, this research proposes to understand the meaning of the differences using multirater feedback. Individuals determine ratings based upon their own perspective and building upon the understanding of rater perspective may result in improved assessments. Data from an existing data set was processed using a second-order CFA in structural equation modeling. Covariance between the second-order factors and rater groups determined the difference in how each rater group perceived the leader."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Analysis of Leadership Perceptions Using Multirater Feedback."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Allen, Jeff M.","Huff, Joseph W.","Schumacker, Randall E.","Wircenski, Jerry L."],"dc:creator":["Bradley, Thomas P."],"dc:date":["2004-05"],"dc:description":["Performance improvement intervention begins with assessment. How that assessment is interpreted can mean the difference between success and failure. Previous research of 360-degree feedback instruments has tried to reconcile the differences between multiple rater groups. Rather than searching for agreement, this research proposes to understand the meaning of the differences using multirater feedback. Individuals determine ratings based upon their own perspective and building upon the understanding of rater perspective may result in improved assessments. Data from an existing data set was processed using a second-order CFA in structural equation modeling. Covariance between the second-order factors and rater groups determined the difference in how each rater group perceived the leader."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 55874124","doi: 10.12794/metadc4533","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4533/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4533"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Bradley, Thomas P.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Leadership.","Feedback (Psychology)","Executives -- Rating of.","rater perspective","leadership perceptions","multirater feedback","360 degree feedback","confirmatory factor analysis"],"dc:title":["Analysis of Leadership Perceptions Using Multirater Feedback."],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}