{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc4507"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc4507","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Comparison of the Status of Widows in Eighteenth-Century England and Colonial America.","abstract":"This thesis compares the status of upper-class widows in England to Colonial America. The common law traditions in England established dower, which was also used in the American colonies. Dower guaranteed widows the right to one-third of the land and property of her husband. Jointure was instituted in England in 1536 and enabled men to bypass dower and settle a yearly sum on a widow. The creation of jointure was able to proliferate in England due to the cash-centered economy, but jointure never manifested itself in Colonial America because of the land centered economy. These two types of inheritance form the background for the argument that upper-class women in Colonial America had more legal and economical freedoms than their brethren in England.","abstract_html":"This thesis compares the status of upper-class widows in England to Colonial America. The common law traditions in England established dower, which was also used in the American colonies. Dower guaranteed widows the right to one-third of the land and property of her husband. Jointure was instituted in England in 1536 and enabled men to bypass dower and settle a yearly sum on a widow. The creation of jointure was able to proliferate in England due to the cash-centered economy, but jointure never manifested itself in Colonial America because of the land centered economy. These two types of inheritance form the background for the argument that upper-class women in Colonial America had more legal and economical freedoms than their brethren in England.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jones, Sarah E."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Morris, Marilyn","Chet, Guy","Stern, Laura"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2004,"date_issued":"2004-05","date_published":"2004-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["Widows -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Great Britain.","Widows -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- United States.","inheritance","18th century British women","18th century American women","dower","jointure","widows"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Jones, Sarah E.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 55874312","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4507/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4507"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 55874312","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4507/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4507/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc4507","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc4507","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Morris, Marilyn","Chet, Guy","Stern, Laura"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jones, Sarah E."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2004-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Widows -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Great Britain.","Widows -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- United States.","inheritance","18th century British women","18th century American women","dower","jointure","widows"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Jones, Sarah E.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 55874312","doi: 10.12794/metadc4507","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4507/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4507"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis compares the status of upper-class widows in England to Colonial America. The common law traditions in England established dower, which was also used in the American colonies. Dower guaranteed widows the right to one-third of the land and property of her husband. Jointure was instituted in England in 1536 and enabled men to bypass dower and settle a yearly sum on a widow. The creation of jointure was able to proliferate in England due to the cash-centered economy, but jointure never manifested itself in Colonial America because of the land centered economy. These two types of inheritance form the background for the argument that upper-class women in Colonial America had more legal and economical freedoms than their brethren in England."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Comparison of the Status of Widows in Eighteenth-Century England and Colonial America."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Morris, Marilyn","Chet, Guy","Stern, Laura"],"dc:creator":["Jones, Sarah E."],"dc:date":["2004-05"],"dc:description":["This thesis compares the status of upper-class widows in England to Colonial America. The common law traditions in England established dower, which was also used in the American colonies. Dower guaranteed widows the right to one-third of the land and property of her husband. Jointure was instituted in England in 1536 and enabled men to bypass dower and settle a yearly sum on a widow. The creation of jointure was able to proliferate in England due to the cash-centered economy, but jointure never manifested itself in Colonial America because of the land centered economy. These two types of inheritance form the background for the argument that upper-class women in Colonial America had more legal and economical freedoms than their brethren in England."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 55874312","doi: 10.12794/metadc4507","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc4507/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc4507"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Jones, Sarah E.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Widows -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Great Britain.","Widows -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- United States.","inheritance","18th century British women","18th century American women","dower","jointure","widows"],"dc:title":["A Comparison of the Status of Widows in Eighteenth-Century England and Colonial America."],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}