{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc3636"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc3636","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Effects of Combining Positive and Negative Reinforcement During Training.","abstract":"The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of combining negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement during teaching with the effects of using positive reinforcement alone. A behavior was trained under two stimulus conditions and procedures. One method involved presenting the cue ven and reinforcing successive approximations to the target behavior. The other method involved presenting the cue punir, physically prompting the target behavior by pulling the leash, and delivering a reinforcer. Three other behaviors were trained using the two cues contingent on their occurrence. The results suggest that stimuli associated with both a positive reinforcer and an aversive stimulus produce a different dynamic than a situation that uses positive reinforcement or punishment alone.","abstract_html":"The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of combining negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement during teaching with the effects of using positive reinforcement alone. A behavior was trained under two stimulus conditions and procedures. One method involved presenting the cue ven and reinforcing successive approximations to the target behavior. The other method involved presenting the cue punir, physically prompting the target behavior by pulling the leash, and delivering a reinforcer. Three other behaviors were trained using the two cues contingent on their occurrence. The results suggest that stimuli associated with both a positive reinforcer and an aversive stimulus produce a different dynamic than a situation that uses positive reinforcement or punishment alone.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Murrey, Nicole A."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rosales Ruíz, Jesús","Smith, Richard","Ellis, Janet"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2007,"date_issued":"2007-05","date_published":"2007-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:34:52Z","subjects":["positive reinforcement","negative reinforcement","conditioned reinforcer","aversive stimulus","discriminative stimulus","Dogs -- Training.","Behavior modification.","Operant conditioning.","Reinforcement (Psychology)","Animal behavior."],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Murrey, Nicole A.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 179540238","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3636/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3636"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 179540238","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3636/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3636/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc3636","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc3636","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rosales Ruíz, Jesús","Smith, Richard","Ellis, Janet"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Murrey, Nicole A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2007-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["positive reinforcement","negative reinforcement","conditioned reinforcer","aversive stimulus","discriminative stimulus","Dogs -- Training.","Behavior modification.","Operant conditioning.","Reinforcement (Psychology)","Animal behavior."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Murrey, Nicole A.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 179540238","doi: 10.12794/metadc3636","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3636/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3636"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of combining negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement during teaching with the effects of using positive reinforcement alone. A behavior was trained under two stimulus conditions and procedures. One method involved presenting the cue ven and reinforcing successive approximations to the target behavior. The other method involved presenting the cue punir, physically prompting the target behavior by pulling the leash, and delivering a reinforcer. Three other behaviors were trained using the two cues contingent on their occurrence. The results suggest that stimuli associated with both a positive reinforcer and an aversive stimulus produce a different dynamic than a situation that uses positive reinforcement or punishment alone."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effects of Combining Positive and Negative Reinforcement During Training."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rosales Ruíz, Jesús","Smith, Richard","Ellis, Janet"],"dc:creator":["Murrey, Nicole A."],"dc:date":["2007-05"],"dc:description":["The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of combining negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement during teaching with the effects of using positive reinforcement alone. A behavior was trained under two stimulus conditions and procedures. One method involved presenting the cue ven and reinforcing successive approximations to the target behavior. The other method involved presenting the cue punir, physically prompting the target behavior by pulling the leash, and delivering a reinforcer. Three other behaviors were trained using the two cues contingent on their occurrence. The results suggest that stimuli associated with both a positive reinforcer and an aversive stimulus produce a different dynamic than a situation that uses positive reinforcement or punishment alone."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 179540238","doi: 10.12794/metadc3636","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3636/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3636"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Murrey, Nicole A.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["positive reinforcement","negative reinforcement","conditioned reinforcer","aversive stimulus","discriminative stimulus","Dogs -- Training.","Behavior modification.","Operant conditioning.","Reinforcement (Psychology)","Animal behavior."],"dc:title":["The Effects of Combining Positive and Negative Reinforcement During Training."],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:34:52Z"}