{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc3598"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc3598","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Effects of Click + Continuous Food Vs. Click + Intermittent Food on the Maintenance of Dog Behavior.","abstract":"There is disagreement among clicker trainers on whether or not food should be delivered every time the clicker (conditioned reinforcer) is used. However, presenting a conditioned reinforcer without food can weaken the strength of the conditioned reinforcer and also disrupt its discriminative stimulus function. A within subjects reversal design was used with 2 dogs to compare the behavioral effects of continuous pairings (C+F condition) vs. intermittent pairings (C+C+F condition) of the clicker with food. Results show that the C+C+F condition affects the frequency, accuracy, topography, and intensity of the behavior, and increases noncompliance and other unwanted behaviors. This study adds to the literature by evaluating the effects of conditioned reinforcement in an applied setting using discrete trials without undergoing extinction.","abstract_html":"There is disagreement among clicker trainers on whether or not food should be delivered every time the clicker (conditioned reinforcer) is used. However, presenting a conditioned reinforcer without food can weaken the strength of the conditioned reinforcer and also disrupt its discriminative stimulus function. A within subjects reversal design was used with 2 dogs to compare the behavioral effects of continuous pairings (C+F condition) vs. intermittent pairings (C+C+F condition) of the clicker with food. Results show that the C+C+F condition affects the frequency, accuracy, topography, and intensity of the behavior, and increases noncompliance and other unwanted behaviors. This study adds to the literature by evaluating the effects of conditioned reinforcement in an applied setting using discrete trials without undergoing extinction.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wennmacher, Pamela L."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Rosales Ruíz, Jesús","Hyten, Cloyd","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2007,"date_issued":"2007-05","date_published":"2007-05","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z","subjects":["clicker training","conditioned reinforcer","animal training","dog training","intermittent reinforcement","Operant conditioning.","Reinforcement (Psychology)","Dogs -- Training."],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Wennmacher, Pamela L.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 176151178","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3598/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3598"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 176151178","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3598/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3598/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc3598","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc3598","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Rosales Ruíz, Jesús","Hyten, Cloyd","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wennmacher, Pamela L."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2007-05"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["clicker training","conditioned reinforcer","animal training","dog training","intermittent reinforcement","Operant conditioning.","Reinforcement (Psychology)","Dogs -- Training."]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Wennmacher, Pamela L.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 176151178","doi: 10.12794/metadc3598","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3598/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3598"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["There is disagreement among clicker trainers on whether or not food should be delivered every time the clicker (conditioned reinforcer) is used. However, presenting a conditioned reinforcer without food can weaken the strength of the conditioned reinforcer and also disrupt its discriminative stimulus function. A within subjects reversal design was used with 2 dogs to compare the behavioral effects of continuous pairings (C+F condition) vs. intermittent pairings (C+C+F condition) of the clicker with food. Results show that the C+C+F condition affects the frequency, accuracy, topography, and intensity of the behavior, and increases noncompliance and other unwanted behaviors. This study adds to the literature by evaluating the effects of conditioned reinforcement in an applied setting using discrete trials without undergoing extinction."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Effects of Click + Continuous Food Vs. Click + Intermittent Food on the Maintenance of Dog Behavior."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Rosales Ruíz, Jesús","Hyten, Cloyd","Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-"],"dc:creator":["Wennmacher, Pamela L."],"dc:date":["2007-05"],"dc:description":["There is disagreement among clicker trainers on whether or not food should be delivered every time the clicker (conditioned reinforcer) is used. However, presenting a conditioned reinforcer without food can weaken the strength of the conditioned reinforcer and also disrupt its discriminative stimulus function. A within subjects reversal design was used with 2 dogs to compare the behavioral effects of continuous pairings (C+F condition) vs. intermittent pairings (C+C+F condition) of the clicker with food. Results show that the C+C+F condition affects the frequency, accuracy, topography, and intensity of the behavior, and increases noncompliance and other unwanted behaviors. This study adds to the literature by evaluating the effects of conditioned reinforcement in an applied setting using discrete trials without undergoing extinction."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 176151178","doi: 10.12794/metadc3598","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3598/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3598"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Wennmacher, Pamela L.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["clicker training","conditioned reinforcer","animal training","dog training","intermittent reinforcement","Operant conditioning.","Reinforcement (Psychology)","Dogs -- Training."],"dc:title":["Effects of Click + Continuous Food Vs. Click + Intermittent Food on the Maintenance of Dog Behavior."],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:35:09Z"}