{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc3273"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc3273","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Effects of Reinforcing Operant Variability on Task Acquisition","abstract":"Neuringer, Deiss, and Olson (2000) was replicated and extended to determine the effect of variability contingencies on task acquisition for twelve 7-9 year old children. Subjects first learned to press a computer's shift keys with increasing response variation. Each subject was then exposed to one of three experimental conditions during which they received a point for target responses. Variability condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for nontarget responses occurring less than 3% of the time. The any condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for any nontarget response. Control subjects received points only for target responses. All variability condition and two control subjects learned the target response. All any condition subjects and two control subjects did not.","abstract_html":"Neuringer, Deiss, and Olson (2000) was replicated and extended to determine the effect of variability contingencies on task acquisition for twelve 7-9 year old children. Subjects first learned to press a computer's shift keys with increasing response variation. Each subject was then exposed to one of three experimental conditions during which they received a point for target responses. Variability condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for nontarget responses occurring less than 3% of the time. The any condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for any nontarget response. Control subjects received points only for target responses. All variability condition and two control subjects learned the target response. All any condition subjects and two control subjects did not.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Seymour, Kail H."],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-","Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla","Smith, Richard"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2002,"date_issued":"2002-12","date_published":"2002-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:34:52Z","subjects":["Operant conditioning.","Learning, Psychology of.","variability","learning","children","reinforcement","target responses"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Use restricted to UNT Community","Copyright","Seymour, Kail H.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 52142734","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3273/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3273"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 52142734","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3273/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3273/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc3273","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc3273","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-","Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla","Smith, Richard"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Seymour, Kail H."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2002-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Operant conditioning.","Learning, Psychology of.","variability","learning","children","reinforcement","target responses"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Use restricted to UNT Community","Copyright","Seymour, Kail H.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 52142734","doi: 10.12794/metadc3273","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3273/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3273"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Neuringer, Deiss, and Olson (2000) was replicated and extended to determine the effect of variability contingencies on task acquisition for twelve 7-9 year old children. Subjects first learned to press a computer's shift keys with increasing response variation. Each subject was then exposed to one of three experimental conditions during which they received a point for target responses. Variability condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for nontarget responses occurring less than 3% of the time. The any condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for any nontarget response. Control subjects received points only for target responses. All variability condition and two control subjects learned the target response. All any condition subjects and two control subjects did not."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effects of Reinforcing Operant Variability on Task Acquisition"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-","Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla","Smith, Richard"],"dc:creator":["Seymour, Kail H."],"dc:date":["2002-12"],"dc:description":["Neuringer, Deiss, and Olson (2000) was replicated and extended to determine the effect of variability contingencies on task acquisition for twelve 7-9 year old children. Subjects first learned to press a computer's shift keys with increasing response variation. Each subject was then exposed to one of three experimental conditions during which they received a point for target responses. Variability condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for nontarget responses occurring less than 3% of the time. The any condition subjects received additional points on a variable interval schedule for any nontarget response. Control subjects received points only for target responses. All variability condition and two control subjects learned the target response. All any condition subjects and two control subjects did not."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 52142734","doi: 10.12794/metadc3273","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3273/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc3273"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Use restricted to UNT Community","Copyright","Seymour, Kail H.","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Operant conditioning.","Learning, Psychology of.","variability","learning","children","reinforcement","target responses"],"dc:title":["The Effects of Reinforcing Operant Variability on Task Acquisition"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:34:52Z"}