Back to results

University of North Texas

Efficacy of Juvenile Offender Assessments: Utilization of Recommendations, Measurement Constructs, and Risk Factors

Abstract

dc:description

The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of juvenile offender assessments. Data from 104 juvenile offender assessments were analyzed and followed up with placement, subsequent offending, and outcome data from the juvenile and adult systems. Constructs consistently assessed included intellectual functioning, academic achievement, and personality functioning; however, under-diagnosis of intellectual deficits, learning disabilities, and personality disorders was found. Results indicated the assessment of family functioning, substance use, and social functioning should be included in comprehensive assessments, as they may result in alternative placement and treatment options of benefit to the juvenile offender. A juvenile offender typology proposed by DiCataldo and Grisso (1995) was successfully utilized and proved predictive of recidivism, future harm to others, and outcome.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
University of North Texas
Year dc:date
2002

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Van Drie, Barbara G
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Sewell, Kenneth W.
  • Cox, Randall J.
  • Neumann, Craig S.

Subjects

dc:subject × 7

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Public
  • Copyright
  • Van Drie, Barbara G
  • Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
oclc: 50923505
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3200/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc3200
OAI identifier oai:identifier
info:ark/67531/metadc3200

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of North Texas
Base URL
digital.library.unt.edu/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Van Drie, Barbara G. Efficacy of Juvenile Offender Assessments: Utilization of Recommendations, Measurement Constructs, and Risk Factors. University of North Texas, 2002. https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc3200