{"id":{"repo_id":"unt","oai_identifier":"info:ark/67531/metadc2731"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unt/info:ark/67531/metadc2731","repository":{"repo_id":"unt","name":"University of North Texas","base_url":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Effects of Biofeedback on Task Performance","abstract":"This experiment attempted to study the effectiveness of biofeedback training on an individual's peak performance while performing a stress-provoking task. In a between subjects design 30 individual college students were divided into 2 groups. One group received auditory biofeedback and relaxation training, and the other group received no training. Both groups met the researcher for 1 hour a week for seven weeks. During each session the participant completed a ten-minute Competition and Coaction (C & C) computer software program (Shea, 1992). The biofeedback equipment recorded the physiological state of each of the participants while he/she performed the C & C task. Both groups' physiological values and C & C scores were compared using the SPSS software. The biofeedback group had statistically lower stress values than the non-biofeedback group (Schwartz, 1995). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups' C & C scores. The STAI Y-1 and Y-2 anxiety inventories were given to each of the participants at the 1st and 7th session to examine the anxiety differences between the 2 groups. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups' STAI scores. This study's findings show that individuals can be taught to lower their stress response while performing a computer task.","abstract_html":"This experiment attempted to study the effectiveness of biofeedback training on an individual's peak performance while performing a stress-provoking task. In a between subjects design 30 individual college students were divided into 2 groups. One group received auditory biofeedback and relaxation training, and the other group received no training. Both groups met the researcher for 1 hour a week for seven weeks. During each session the participant completed a ten-minute Competition and Coaction (C & C) computer software program (Shea, 1992). The biofeedback equipment recorded the physiological state of each of the participants while he/she performed the C & C task. Both groups' physiological values and C & C scores were compared using the SPSS software. The biofeedback group had statistically lower stress values than the non-biofeedback group (Schwartz, 1995). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups' C & C scores. The STAI Y-1 and Y-2 anxiety inventories were given to each of the participants at the 1st and 7th session to examine the anxiety differences between the 2 groups. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups' STAI scores. This study's findings show that individuals can be taught to lower their stress response while performing a computer task.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bruce, Kurt"],"institution":"University of North Texas","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bungum, Timothy J.","Chandler, Cynthia K.","Chng, Chwee-Lye"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2000,"date_issued":"2000-12","date_published":"2000-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:34:52Z","subjects":["Biofeedback training.","Stress (Psychology)","anxiety inventories","auditory biofeedback","stress response","SPSS","stress values"],"languages":["English"],"rights":["Public","Copyright","Bruce, Kurt","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 49776689","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2731/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc2731"],"render_values":[{"text":"oclc: 49776689","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2731/","href":"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2731/","code":true},{"text":"ark: ark:/67531/metadc2731","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc2731","outbound_label":"DOI","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bungum, Timothy J.","Chandler, Cynthia K.","Chng, Chwee-Lye"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bruce, Kurt"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2000-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of North Texas"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis or Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Biofeedback training.","Stress (Psychology)","anxiety inventories","auditory biofeedback","stress response","SPSS","stress values"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Public","Copyright","Bruce, Kurt","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oclc: 49776689","doi: 10.12794/metadc2731","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2731/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc2731"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This experiment attempted to study the effectiveness of biofeedback training on an individual's peak performance while performing a stress-provoking task. In a between subjects design 30 individual college students were divided into 2 groups. One group received auditory biofeedback and relaxation training, and the other group received no training. Both groups met the researcher for 1 hour a week for seven weeks. During each session the participant completed a ten-minute Competition and Coaction (C & C) computer software program (Shea, 1992). The biofeedback equipment recorded the physiological state of each of the participants while he/she performed the C & C task. Both groups' physiological values and C & C scores were compared using the SPSS software. The biofeedback group had statistically lower stress values than the non-biofeedback group (Schwartz, 1995). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups' C & C scores. The STAI Y-1 and Y-2 anxiety inventories were given to each of the participants at the 1st and 7th session to examine the anxiety differences between the 2 groups. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups' STAI scores. This study's findings show that individuals can be taught to lower their stress response while performing a computer task."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["Text"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effects of Biofeedback on Task Performance"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bungum, Timothy J.","Chandler, Cynthia K.","Chng, Chwee-Lye"],"dc:creator":["Bruce, Kurt"],"dc:date":["2000-12"],"dc:description":["This experiment attempted to study the effectiveness of biofeedback training on an individual's peak performance while performing a stress-provoking task. In a between subjects design 30 individual college students were divided into 2 groups. One group received auditory biofeedback and relaxation training, and the other group received no training. Both groups met the researcher for 1 hour a week for seven weeks. During each session the participant completed a ten-minute Competition and Coaction (C & C) computer software program (Shea, 1992). The biofeedback equipment recorded the physiological state of each of the participants while he/she performed the C & C task. Both groups' physiological values and C & C scores were compared using the SPSS software. The biofeedback group had statistically lower stress values than the non-biofeedback group (Schwartz, 1995). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups' C & C scores. The STAI Y-1 and Y-2 anxiety inventories were given to each of the participants at the 1st and 7th session to examine the anxiety differences between the 2 groups. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups' STAI scores. This study's findings show that individuals can be taught to lower their stress response while performing a computer task."],"dc:format":["Text"],"dc:identifier":["oclc: 49776689","doi: 10.12794/metadc2731","https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2731/","ark: ark:/67531/metadc2731"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:publisher":["University of North Texas"],"dc:rights":["Public","Copyright","Bruce, Kurt","Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved."],"dc:subject":["Biofeedback training.","Stress (Psychology)","anxiety inventories","auditory biofeedback","stress response","SPSS","stress values"],"dc:title":["The Effects of Biofeedback on Task Performance"],"dc:type":["Thesis or Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:34:52Z"}