Back to results

University of North Texas

Comparison of Computer Testing versus Traditional Paper and Pencil Testing

Abstract

dc:description

This study evaluated 227 students attending 12 classes of the Apprentice Medical Services Specialist Resident Course. Six classes containing a total of 109 students took the Block One Tests in the traditional paper and pencil form. Another six classes containing a total of 118 students took the same Block One Tests on computers. A confidence level of .99 and level of signifi­cance of .01 was established. An independent samples t-test was conducted on the sample. Additionally, a one-way analysis of variance was performed between the classes administered the Block One Tests on computers. Several other frequencies and comparisons of Block One Test scores and other variables were accomplished. The variables examined included test versions, shifts, student age, student source, and education levels. The study found no significant difference between test administration modes. This study concluded that computer-administering tests identical to those typically administered in the traditional paper and pencil manner had no significant effect on achievement. It is important to note, however, that the conclusion may only be valid if the computer-administered test contains exactly the same test items, in the same order and format, with the same layout, structure, and choices as the traditional paper and pencil test. In other words, unless the tests are identical in every possible way except the actual test administration mode this conclusion may not be applicable.

Degree

thesis:*
Grantor dc:publisher
University of North Texas
Year dc:date
2000

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Millsap, Claudette M.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Wircenski, Jerry L.
  • Young, Jon I.
  • Ditzenberger, Roger
  • Sarkees-Wircenski, Michelle

Subjects

dc:subject × 7

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Public
  • Copyright
  • Millsap, Claudette M.
  • Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Identifier
oclc: 49937824
untcat: b2374891
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2621/
ark: ark:/67531/metadc2621
OAI identifier oai:identifier
info:ark/67531/metadc2621

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of North Texas
Base URL
digital.library.unt.edu/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Millsap, Claudette M.. Comparison of Computer Testing versus Traditional Paper and Pencil Testing. University of North Texas, 2000. https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc2621