{"id":{"repo_id":"unr","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarwolf.unr.edu:11714/6748"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unr/oai:scholarwolf.unr.edu:11714/6748","repository":{"repo_id":"unr","name":"University of Nevada - Reno","base_url":"https://scholarwolf.unr.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Great is our Sin: Neuroprivilege in Modern Autism Discourse","abstract":"Disability and Neurorhetorics have taken significant strides in unpacking disabling language and discourse within modern autism studies. The rhetoric of science has determined multiple useful strategies for isolating the mechanisms by which these discursive paradigms operate. However, less attention has been devoted to the origin of theories suggesting that observed differences in autistic behavior necessarily indicate deficiencies in cognitive ability. Rigorous work demonstrating propagation and dissemination of these concepts through time within disciplinary publishing is needed to expose how flawed ontological perspectives on neurotype can integrate themselves into neuroscientific practice. This work employs lexical and visual enthymeme analysis to explore how driving, value-laden premises behind disablist language can become accepted as legitimate scientific 'facts' considered foundational within a discipline.","abstract_html":"Disability and Neurorhetorics have taken significant strides in unpacking disabling language and discourse within modern autism studies. The rhetoric of science has determined multiple useful strategies for isolating the mechanisms by which these discursive paradigms operate. However, less attention has been devoted to the origin of theories suggesting that observed differences in autistic behavior necessarily indicate deficiencies in cognitive ability. Rigorous work demonstrating propagation and dissemination of these concepts through time within disciplinary publishing is needed to expose how flawed ontological perspectives on neurotype can integrate themselves into neuroscientific practice. This work employs lexical and visual enthymeme analysis to explore how driving, value-laden premises behind disablist language can become accepted as legitimate scientific 'facts' considered foundational within a discipline.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["DeGraffenreid, Lauren J."],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":"Doctorate Degree","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Olman, Lynda C."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Thorkildson, Diane","Miller, Elisabeth","Webber, James","Vigil, Debra"],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019","date_published":"2019","updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:47:36Z","subjects":["Autism Studies","Enthymeme","Neuroprivilege","Neurorhetoric","Neuroscience","Theory of Mind"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/11714/6748","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Olman, Lynda C."]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Thorkildson, Diane","Miller, Elisabeth","Webber, James","Vigil, Debra"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["DeGraffenreid, Lauren J."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2020-01-31T05:00:24Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-01-31T05:00:24Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2019"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctorate Degree"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Autism Studies","Enthymeme","Neuroprivilege","Neurorhetoric","Neuroscience","Theory of Mind"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/11714/6748"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Disability and Neurorhetorics have taken significant strides in unpacking disabling language and discourse within modern autism studies. The rhetoric of science has determined multiple useful strategies for isolating the mechanisms by which these discursive paradigms operate. However, less attention has been devoted to the origin of theories suggesting that observed differences in autistic behavior necessarily indicate deficiencies in cognitive ability. Rigorous work demonstrating propagation and dissemination of these concepts through time within disciplinary publishing is needed to expose how flawed ontological perspectives on neurotype can integrate themselves into neuroscientific practice. This work employs lexical and visual enthymeme analysis to explore how driving, value-laden premises behind disablist language can become accepted as legitimate scientific 'facts' considered foundational within a discipline."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["PDF"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Great is our Sin: Neuroprivilege in Modern Autism Discourse"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Olman, Lynda C."],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Thorkildson, Diane","Miller, Elisabeth","Webber, James","Vigil, Debra"],"dc:creator":["DeGraffenreid, Lauren J."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2020-01-31T05:00:24Z"],"dc:date.available":["2020-01-31T05:00:24Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2019"],"dc:description.abstract":["Disability and Neurorhetorics have taken significant strides in unpacking disabling language and discourse within modern autism studies. The rhetoric of science has determined multiple useful strategies for isolating the mechanisms by which these discursive paradigms operate. However, less attention has been devoted to the origin of theories suggesting that observed differences in autistic behavior necessarily indicate deficiencies in cognitive ability. Rigorous work demonstrating propagation and dissemination of these concepts through time within disciplinary publishing is needed to expose how flawed ontological perspectives on neurotype can integrate themselves into neuroscientific practice. This work employs lexical and visual enthymeme analysis to explore how driving, value-laden premises behind disablist language can become accepted as legitimate scientific 'facts' considered foundational within a discipline."],"dc:format":["PDF"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/11714/6748"],"dc:subject":["Autism Studies","Enthymeme","Neuroprivilege","Neurorhetoric","Neuroscience","Theory of Mind"],"dc:title":["Great is our Sin: Neuroprivilege in Modern Autism Discourse"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctorate Degree"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T21:47:36Z"}