Abstract
dc:description.abstractIn contemporary philosophy of mind, the mind-body problem is often framed in terms ofthe reduction of psychology to neuroscience. In this thesis I argue that whether or notone regards such a reduction as tenable depends upon a methodological decision aboutthe importance of our naïve intuitions concerning the mind and the material world. Iclaim that standard anti-reductive argumentative strategies rest upon systematicallydeceptive and underdeveloped intuitions. As a result, we should reject these intuitionsand forms of argumentation and adopt instead a pragmatic philosophy of mind that allowsfor the principled reduction of psychology, but at the time time maintains a pluralisticmethodology.
Degree
thesis:*- Level thesis:degree_level
- Master's Degree
- Year dc:date.issued
- 2016
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Kanzelmeyer, Jonathan C.
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Nickles, Thomas J.
- Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
-
- Nickles, Thomas
- Williams, Christopher
- Webster, Michael
Subjects
dc:subject × 6Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- In Copyright(All Rights Reserved)
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2198
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:scholarwolf.unr.edu:11714/2198