{"id":{"repo_id":"uno","oai_identifier":"oai:scholarworks.uno.edu:td-1937"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uno/oai:scholarworks.uno.edu:td-1937","repository":{"repo_id":"uno","name":"University of New Orleans","base_url":"https://scholarworks.uno.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Primary Systems and Voter Turnout: Measuring the Institutional Effect of Primary Type on Voter Turnout","abstract":"Using the 1990, 1994 and 1998 Congressional mid-term elections, this study looks at whether the type of primary system in a person's state has an effect on whether or not that person will vote in the general election. The five types of primary systems (closed, semi-closed, semiopen, open and blanket) are explained as well as traditional factors for likelihood of voting. It is hypothesized that the more closed the primary system, the less likely a person is to vote. Data analysis shows that when significant, living in an open primary state does significantly increase the likelihood that a person will vote. However, primary type was significant in only six of the nine models studied here.","abstract_html":"Using the 1990, 1994 and 1998 Congressional mid-term elections, this study looks at whether the type of primary system in a person's state has an effect on whether or not that person will vote in the general election. The five types of primary systems (closed, semi-closed, semiopen, open and blanket) are explained as well as traditional factors for likelihood of voting. It is hypothesized that the more closed the primary system, the less likely a person is to vote. Data analysis shows that when significant, living in an open primary state does significantly increase the likelihood that a person will vote. However, primary type was significant in only six of the nine models studied here.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Lott, Leslie"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Day, Christine","Chervenak, Edward E.","Montjoy, Robert S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-05-15T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2009-05-15T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:28:56Z","subjects":["Primary systems","Closed primary","Semi-closed primary","Semi-open primary","Open primary","Blanket primary","Voter turnout"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/956","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Day, Christine","Chervenak, Edward E.","Montjoy, Robert S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Lott, Leslie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Primary systems","Closed primary","Semi-closed primary","Semi-open primary","Open primary","Blanket primary","Voter turnout"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/956"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Using the 1990, 1994 and 1998 Congressional mid-term elections, this study looks at whether the type of primary system in a person's state has an effect on whether or not that person will vote in the general election. The five types of primary systems (closed, semi-closed, semiopen, open and blanket) are explained as well as traditional factors for likelihood of voting. It is hypothesized that the more closed the primary system, the less likely a person is to vote. Data analysis shows that when significant, living in an open primary state does significantly increase the likelihood that a person will vote. However, primary type was significant in only six of the nine models studied here."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Primary Systems and Voter Turnout: Measuring the Institutional Effect of Primary Type on Voter Turnout"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Day, Christine","Chervenak, Edward E.","Montjoy, Robert S."],"dc:creator":["Lott, Leslie"],"dc:description.abstract":["Using the 1990, 1994 and 1998 Congressional mid-term elections, this study looks at whether the type of primary system in a person's state has an effect on whether or not that person will vote in the general election. The five types of primary systems (closed, semi-closed, semiopen, open and blanket) are explained as well as traditional factors for likelihood of voting. It is hypothesized that the more closed the primary system, the less likely a person is to vote. Data analysis shows that when significant, living in an open primary state does significantly increase the likelihood that a person will vote. However, primary type was significant in only six of the nine models studied here."],"dc:identifier":["https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/956"],"dc:subject":["Primary systems","Closed primary","Semi-closed primary","Semi-open primary","Open primary","Blanket primary","Voter turnout"],"dc:title":["Primary Systems and Voter Turnout: Measuring the Institutional Effect of Primary Type on Voter Turnout"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:28:56Z"}