Back to results

University of New Orleans

A Comparison Of Installation Methods And Maintenance Practices Of Protected Side Armoring

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The IPET (Interagency Performance Evaluation Taskforce) Team's significant finding is if the levees had armoring, the HSDRRS would have an element of resiliency. IPET defines resiliency as "The ability to withstand, without catastrophic failure…beyond those intended or estimated in the design. …resilience refers to the ability to withstand higher than designed water levels and overtopping without breaching" (USACE, 2007). In the analysis of armoring products, two criterions usually govern. First, the ability for the armoring to resist overtopping velocity from storms greater than the 100 year authorized level. Second, does the product facilitate installation and maintenance post-Katrina? This thesis will help expand the knowledge base and hopefully the comfort level of armoring products so that we may widen our range of resources. Different products and their methods for installation and maintenance will be presented. The result of one full-scale field test performed by USACE Armoring Team is described.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
M.S.
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Year
2009

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Villa, April J.
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Nataraj, Mysore S.; Barbe, Donald E.
  • Mattei, Norma Jean

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/923
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholarworks.uno.edu:td-1904

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of New Orleans
Base URL
scholarworks.uno.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Villa, April J.. A Comparison Of Installation Methods And Maintenance Practices Of Protected Side Armoring. Thesis thesis, 2009. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/923