{"id":{"repo_id":"unm","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalrepository.unm.edu:fll_etds-1095"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unm/oai:digitalrepository.unm.edu:fll_etds-1095","repository":{"repo_id":"unm","name":"University of New Mexico","base_url":"https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"UNTRANSLATABLE WORDS IN CLASSICAL LATIN: THE PROBLEM WITH PIUS","abstract":"The Romans of the Classical Era (circa 100 B.C.E. to 15 C.E.) had a social, religious, and legal structure that was vastly different from that of modern Western societies. On account of this difference and especially due to the influence of the Christian religion, many Roman concepts have been misunderstood and mistranslated. This thesis analyzes the Latin word pius along with its nominal and adverbial derivatives in ancient literature to try to understand how the concept actually worked in Roman cognition. Perhaps due to the fact that words like pity,' 'pious,' and 'piety' all derive from pius, the way it is translated into English often reflects less an understanding of how the Romans used it and more and understanding of the way in which Christians used it. The poets Catullus and Vergil and the historian Livy are the chief sources for this analysis.","abstract_html":"The Romans of the Classical Era (circa 100 B.C.E. to 15 C.E.) had a social, religious, and legal structure that was vastly different from that of modern Western societies. On account of this difference and especially due to the influence of the Christian religion, many Roman concepts have been misunderstood and mistranslated. This thesis analyzes the Latin word pius along with its nominal and adverbial derivatives in ancient literature to try to understand how the concept actually worked in Roman cognition. Perhaps due to the fact that words like pity,&#x27; &#x27;pious,&#x27; and &#x27;piety&#x27; all derive from pius, the way it is translated into English often reflects less an understanding of how the Romans used it and more and understanding of the way in which Christians used it. The poets Catullus and Vergil and the historian Livy are the chief sources for this analysis.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Woodell, Keith Alexander"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Cyrino, Monica","Garcia, Lorenzo","Ivanova-Sullivan, Tanya"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012-07-03T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2012-07-03T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:26:07Z","subjects":["Classics","Classical Studies","Linguistics","Semantics","Latin","Italic","Indo-European","Livy","Catullus","Vergil","Virgil"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds/95"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds/95","href":"https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds/95","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20799","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Cyrino, Monica","Garcia, Lorenzo","Ivanova-Sullivan, Tanya"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Woodell, Keith Alexander"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis","Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Classics","Classical Studies","Linguistics","Semantics","Latin","Italic","Indo-European","Livy","Catullus","Vergil","Virgil"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20799","https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds/95"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The Romans of the Classical Era (circa 100 B.C.E. to 15 C.E.) had a social, religious, and legal structure that was vastly different from that of modern Western societies. On account of this difference and especially due to the influence of the Christian religion, many Roman concepts have been misunderstood and mistranslated. This thesis analyzes the Latin word pius along with its nominal and adverbial derivatives in ancient literature to try to understand how the concept actually worked in Roman cognition. Perhaps due to the fact that words like pity,' 'pious,' and 'piety' all derive from pius, the way it is translated into English often reflects less an understanding of how the Romans used it and more and understanding of the way in which Christians used it. The poets Catullus and Vergil and the historian Livy are the chief sources for this analysis."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["UNTRANSLATABLE WORDS IN CLASSICAL LATIN: THE PROBLEM WITH PIUS"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Cyrino, Monica","Garcia, Lorenzo","Ivanova-Sullivan, Tanya"],"dc:creator":["Woodell, Keith Alexander"],"dc:description.abstract":["The Romans of the Classical Era (circa 100 B.C.E. to 15 C.E.) had a social, religious, and legal structure that was vastly different from that of modern Western societies. On account of this difference and especially due to the influence of the Christian religion, many Roman concepts have been misunderstood and mistranslated. This thesis analyzes the Latin word pius along with its nominal and adverbial derivatives in ancient literature to try to understand how the concept actually worked in Roman cognition. Perhaps due to the fact that words like pity,' 'pious,' and 'piety' all derive from pius, the way it is translated into English often reflects less an understanding of how the Romans used it and more and understanding of the way in which Christians used it. The poets Catullus and Vergil and the historian Livy are the chief sources for this analysis."],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/1928/20799","https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds/95"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Classics","Classical Studies","Linguistics","Semantics","Latin","Italic","Indo-European","Livy","Catullus","Vergil","Virgil"],"dc:title":["UNTRANSLATABLE WORDS IN CLASSICAL LATIN: THE PROBLEM WITH PIUS"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis","Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["Comparative Literature and Cultural Studies"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:26:07Z"}