Back to results

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Mock juror perceptions of juvenile defendants in adult court

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The focus of this study is on individual juror's perceptions of juveniles that have been remanded to the adult court system for trial. Jurors are expected to be harsher on juveniles tried in adult court than they would be on adults who committed the same crime. Participants recruited from students in UNLV's criminal justice classes were given a short vignette of a crime where the defendant's age and severity of the crime were manipulated. Participants were also given a short packet of personality questionnaires. Participants were asked to make verdict recommendations and sentence the offender when a guilty verdict was rendered. Results did not support the initial hypothesis. There was no significant difference between juveniles and adults with regard to verdicts rendered, nor did the personality scales have a significant effect on results.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Arts (MA)
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Criminal Justice
Grantor dc:publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Year
2001

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Personius, Jennifer Lynne
Contributors dc:contributor
  • Joel D. Lieberman

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:oasis.library.unlv.edu:rtds-2292

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Base URL
oasis.library.unlv.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Personius, Jennifer Lynne. Mock juror perceptions of juvenile defendants in adult court. Thesis thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2001. https://doi.org/10.25669/k989-qgl7