Recently, national fire policy has been redirected from a primary focus on suppression towards a more integrated and comprehensive approach developed at the community level. As part of this policy shift, Congress passed the Healthy Forest Restoration Act (P.L. 108-148) in 2003 encouraging communities to develop community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs) to guide fuel reduction and wildfire mitigation efforts on both federal and nonfederal lands. This research examines U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and community collaboration in the development of CWPPs through a case study analysis of four communities in two western states. The social and decision-making processes used in the development of CWPPs are examined in each community using the policy sciences approach and decision process framework. A cross-case comparison reveals the influence of social process factors and effectiveness of each community's decision process to address the wildfire problem. The primary finding of this research is the critical role played by the USFS in the success of CWPP planning efforts. Additional recommendations are provided for improving the effectiveness of community decision-making processes to address this important and pressing management issue.
","abstract_html":"<p>Recently, national fire policy has been redirected from a primary focus on suppression towards a more integrated and comprehensive approach developed at the community level. As part of this policy shift, Congress passed the Healthy Forest Restoration Act (P.L. 108-148) in 2003 encouraging communities to develop community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs) to guide fuel reduction and wildfire mitigation efforts on both federal and nonfederal lands. This research examines U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and community collaboration in the development of CWPPs through a case study analysis of four communities in two western states. The social and decision-making processes used in the development of CWPPs are examined in each community using the policy sciences approach and decision process framework. A cross-case comparison reveals the influence of social process factors and effectiveness of each community's decision process to address the wildfire problem. The primary finding of this research is the critical role played by the USFS in the success of CWPP planning efforts. Additional recommendations are provided for improving the effectiveness of community decision-making processes to address this important and pressing management issue.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Fleeger, William E"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Mimi L Becker"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2007,"date_issued":"2007-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2007-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:22:19Z","subjects":["Agriculture","Forestry and Wildlife"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/361","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Mimi L Becker"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Fleeger, William E"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Agriculture","Forestry and Wildlife"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/361"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Recently, national fire policy has been redirected from a primary focus on suppression towards a more integrated and comprehensive approach developed at the community level. As part of this policy shift, Congress passed the Healthy Forest Restoration Act (P.L. 108-148) in 2003 encouraging communities to develop community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs) to guide fuel reduction and wildfire mitigation efforts on both federal and nonfederal lands. This research examines U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and community collaboration in the development of CWPPs through a case study analysis of four communities in two western states. The social and decision-making processes used in the development of CWPPs are examined in each community using the policy sciences approach and decision process framework. A cross-case comparison reveals the influence of social process factors and effectiveness of each community's decision process to address the wildfire problem. The primary finding of this research is the critical role played by the USFS in the success of CWPP planning efforts. Additional recommendations are provided for improving the effectiveness of community decision-making processes to address this important and pressing management issue.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Standing closest to the flame: Community wildfire planning and the Healthy Forest Act"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Mimi L Becker"],"dc:creator":["Fleeger, William E"],"dc:description.abstract":["Recently, national fire policy has been redirected from a primary focus on suppression towards a more integrated and comprehensive approach developed at the community level. As part of this policy shift, Congress passed the Healthy Forest Restoration Act (P.L. 108-148) in 2003 encouraging communities to develop community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs) to guide fuel reduction and wildfire mitigation efforts on both federal and nonfederal lands. This research examines U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and community collaboration in the development of CWPPs through a case study analysis of four communities in two western states. The social and decision-making processes used in the development of CWPPs are examined in each community using the policy sciences approach and decision process framework. A cross-case comparison reveals the influence of social process factors and effectiveness of each community's decision process to address the wildfire problem. The primary finding of this research is the critical role played by the USFS in the success of CWPP planning efforts. Additional recommendations are provided for improving the effectiveness of community decision-making processes to address this important and pressing management issue.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/361"],"dc:subject":["Agriculture","Forestry and Wildlife"],"dc:title":["Standing closest to the flame: Community wildfire planning and the Healthy Forest Act"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:22:19Z"}