{"id":{"repo_id":"unf","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.unf.edu:etd-1657"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/unf/oai:digitalcommons.unf.edu:etd-1657","repository":{"repo_id":"unf","name":"University of North Florida","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Perspectives","abstract":"This thesis addresses primary concepts in the humanitarian intervention debates. I argue that humanitarian intervention is a perfect duty. The global community has a moral obligation to act decisively in the face of extreme human rights abuses. There are two contrasting theoretical perspectives regarding international relations and humanitarian intervention: statism and cosmopolitanism. These contrasting perspectives contest the relative value of state sovereignty and human rights. Some of the most prominent ethicists in the debate have determined states have a “right” to intervene militarily in the internal affairs of other states to halt severe human rights abuses but there is no “duty”to intervene. These conclusions are largely based upon consequentialist considerations. This thesis argues a deontological perspective is essential. References to events Rwanda, Darfur, and Kosovo are made. There is a critical role for preemptive actions to play in addressing humanitarian crises and calls for global justice.","abstract_html":"This thesis addresses primary concepts in the humanitarian intervention debates. I argue that humanitarian intervention is a perfect duty. The global community has a moral obligation to act decisively in the face of extreme human rights abuses. There are two contrasting theoretical perspectives regarding international relations and humanitarian intervention: statism and cosmopolitanism. These contrasting perspectives contest the relative value of state sovereignty and human rights. Some of the most prominent ethicists in the debate have determined states have a “right” to intervene militarily in the internal affairs of other states to halt severe human rights abuses but there is no “duty”to intervene. These conclusions are largely based upon consequentialist considerations. This thesis argues a deontological perspective is essential. References to events Rwanda, Darfur, and Kosovo are made. There is a critical role for preemptive actions to play in addressing humanitarian crises and calls for global justice.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Clark, Tyrome","Clark, Tyrome Nathan, 1958-"],"institution":"University of North Florida. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies","degree_name":"Master of Arts (MA)","degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Mitchell Haney","Dr. Andrew Buchwalter","Dr. Jonathan Matheson"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":null,"date_issued":"","date_published":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:49:34Z","subjects":["Thesis; University of North Florida; UNF; Dissertations; Academic -- UNF -- Master of Arts in Practical Philosophy and Applied Ethics; Dissertations; Academic -- UNF -- Philosophy; perfect duties; humanitarian intervention; human rights; sovereignty; statism; cosmopolitanism; morally determinant; preemption; deontological ethics; consequentialist ethics","Ethics and Political Philosophy"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/633","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"source_record":{"url":"https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/do/oai/?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_etdms&identifier=oai%3Adigitalcommons.unf.edu%3Aetd-1657","prefix":"oai_etdms"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Mitchell Haney","Dr. Andrew Buchwalter","Dr. Jonathan Matheson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Clark, Tyrome","Clark, Tyrome Nathan, 1958-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2016-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["UNF Digital Commons"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["thesis","Master's Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts (MA)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of North Florida. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Thesis; University of North Florida; UNF; Dissertations; Academic -- UNF -- Master of Arts in Practical Philosophy and Applied Ethics; Dissertations; Academic -- UNF -- Philosophy; perfect duties; humanitarian intervention; human rights; sovereignty; statism; cosmopolitanism; morally determinant; preemption; deontological ethics; consequentialist ethics","Ethics and Political Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/633","https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/context/etd/article/1657/viewcontent/ETD1288PA.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This thesis addresses primary concepts in the humanitarian intervention debates. I argue that humanitarian intervention is a perfect duty. The global community has a moral obligation to act decisively in the face of extreme human rights abuses. There are two contrasting theoretical perspectives regarding international relations and humanitarian intervention: statism and cosmopolitanism. These contrasting perspectives contest the relative value of state sovereignty and human rights. Some of the most prominent ethicists in the debate have determined states have a “right” to intervene militarily in the internal affairs of other states to halt severe human rights abuses but there is no “duty”to intervene. These conclusions are largely based upon consequentialist considerations. This thesis argues a deontological perspective is essential. References to events Rwanda, Darfur, and Kosovo are made. There is a critical role for preemptive actions to play in addressing humanitarian crises and calls for global justice."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:source","label":"Dc Source","values":["UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Perspectives"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Mitchell Haney","Dr. Andrew Buchwalter","Dr. Jonathan Matheson"],"dc:creator":["Clark, Tyrome","Clark, Tyrome Nathan, 1958-"],"dc:date":["2016-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description":["This thesis addresses primary concepts in the humanitarian intervention debates. I argue that humanitarian intervention is a perfect duty. The global community has a moral obligation to act decisively in the face of extreme human rights abuses. There are two contrasting theoretical perspectives regarding international relations and humanitarian intervention: statism and cosmopolitanism. These contrasting perspectives contest the relative value of state sovereignty and human rights. Some of the most prominent ethicists in the debate have determined states have a “right” to intervene militarily in the internal affairs of other states to halt severe human rights abuses but there is no “duty”to intervene. These conclusions are largely based upon consequentialist considerations. This thesis argues a deontological perspective is essential. References to events Rwanda, Darfur, and Kosovo are made. There is a critical role for preemptive actions to play in addressing humanitarian crises and calls for global justice."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/633","https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/context/etd/article/1657/viewcontent/ETD1288PA.pdf"],"dc:publisher":["UNF Digital Commons"],"dc:rights":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dc:source":["UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations"],"dc:subject":["Thesis; University of North Florida; UNF; Dissertations; Academic -- UNF -- Master of Arts in Practical Philosophy and Applied Ethics; Dissertations; Academic -- UNF -- Philosophy; perfect duties; humanitarian intervention; human rights; sovereignty; statism; cosmopolitanism; morally determinant; preemption; deontological ethics; consequentialist ethics","Ethics and Political Philosophy"],"dc:title":["Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Perspectives"],"dc:type":["thesis","Master's Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts (MA)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of North Florida. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies"]},"updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:49:34Z"}