{"id":{"repo_id":"umkc","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/9587"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/umkc/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/9587","repository":{"repo_id":"umkc","name":"University of Missouri - Kansas City","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Joanna Baillie: The Theory in Her Plays on the Passions and an Analysis of Four Dramas Within that Series","abstract":"This thesis examines the theatre theory as outlined by Joanna Baillie in the Introductory Discourse to her Series of Plays in Which it is Attempted to Delineate the Stronger Passions of the Mind: Each Passion Being the Subject of a Tragedy and a Comedy (the Plays on the Passions). It has become common among theatrical and literary scholars to condemn Baillie's work as either a dramatic failure or a literary oddity. Although attempts have been made to rehabilitate Baillie's reputation, most of the work has been done from the feminist perspective and Baillie's Plays on the Passions project continues to be perceived as a failure. Using contemporary reviews, modern analysis, and Baillie's theory, this thesis analyzes four of Baillie's plays from her Plays on the Passions series to determine how well they adhere to Baillie's theory. Using the findings of that analysis, this thesis analyzes Baillie's work according to the context she establishes for herself in her Introductory Discourse.","abstract_html":"This thesis examines the theatre theory as outlined by Joanna Baillie in the Introductory Discourse to her Series of Plays in Which it is Attempted to Delineate the Stronger Passions of the Mind: Each Passion Being the Subject of a Tragedy and a Comedy (the Plays on the Passions). It has become common among theatrical and literary scholars to condemn Baillie's work as either a dramatic failure or a literary oddity. Although attempts have been made to rehabilitate Baillie's reputation, most of the work has been done from the feminist perspective and Baillie's Plays on the Passions project continues to be perceived as a failure. Using contemporary reviews, modern analysis, and Baillie's theory, this thesis analyzes four of Baillie's plays from her Plays on the Passions series to determine how well they adhere to Baillie's theory. Using the findings of that analysis, this thesis analyzes Baillie's work according to the context she establishes for herself in her Introductory Discourse.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Baker, Megan A. (Megan Abigail), 1984-"],"institution":"University of Missouri--Kansas City","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Theatre (UMKC)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Londré, Felicia Hardison, 1941-"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010","date_published":"2010","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:18:34Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10355/9587","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Londré, Felicia Hardison, 1941-"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Baker, Megan A. (Megan Abigail), 1984-"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-01-20T18:18:26Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-01-20T18:18:26Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Theatre (UMKC)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10355/9587"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed on January 20, 2011.","Thesis advisor: Felicia Hardison Londré.","Vita.","Includes bibliographic references (pages 106-115).","Thesis (M.A.)--Dept. of Theatre. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2010."]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis examines the theatre theory as outlined by Joanna Baillie in the Introductory Discourse to her Series of Plays in Which it is Attempted to Delineate the Stronger Passions of the Mind: Each Passion Being the Subject of a Tragedy and a Comedy (the Plays on the Passions). It has become common among theatrical and literary scholars to condemn Baillie's work as either a dramatic failure or a literary oddity. Although attempts have been made to rehabilitate Baillie's reputation, most of the work has been done from the feminist perspective and Baillie's Plays on the Passions project continues to be perceived as a failure. Using contemporary reviews, modern analysis, and Baillie's theory, this thesis analyzes four of Baillie's plays from her Plays on the Passions series to determine how well they adhere to Baillie's theory. Using the findings of that analysis, this thesis analyzes Baillie's work according to the context she establishes for herself in her Introductory Discourse."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Joanna Baillie: The Theory in Her Plays on the Passions and an Analysis of Four Dramas Within that Series"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Londré, Felicia Hardison, 1941-"],"dc:creator":["Baker, Megan A. (Megan Abigail), 1984-"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-01-20T18:18:26Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-01-20T18:18:26Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010"],"dc:description":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed on January 20, 2011.","Thesis advisor: Felicia Hardison Londré.","Vita.","Includes bibliographic references (pages 106-115).","Thesis (M.A.)--Dept. of Theatre. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2010."],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis examines the theatre theory as outlined by Joanna Baillie in the Introductory Discourse to her Series of Plays in Which it is Attempted to Delineate the Stronger Passions of the Mind: Each Passion Being the Subject of a Tragedy and a Comedy (the Plays on the Passions). It has become common among theatrical and literary scholars to condemn Baillie's work as either a dramatic failure or a literary oddity. Although attempts have been made to rehabilitate Baillie's reputation, most of the work has been done from the feminist perspective and Baillie's Plays on the Passions project continues to be perceived as a failure. Using contemporary reviews, modern analysis, and Baillie's theory, this thesis analyzes four of Baillie's plays from her Plays on the Passions series to determine how well they adhere to Baillie's theory. Using the findings of that analysis, this thesis analyzes Baillie's work according to the context she establishes for herself in her Introductory Discourse."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10355/9587"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"],"dc:title":["Joanna Baillie: The Theory in Her Plays on the Passions and an Analysis of Four Dramas Within that Series"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Theatre (UMKC)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:18:34Z"}