Back to results

University of Missouri -- Kansas City

Bureaucracy and other stories

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

The following project is the product of three years of intensive research and trial and error. You’ll notice it’s divided into two sections: fiction and nonfiction. However, one of the research questions central to this project is: What are some of the reasons such genre differences matter? What follows aims to trouble the line between the two categories. Ultimately, the main difference, this project argues—indirectly—comes down to the expectations readers bring to the table, based on the way a given piece is presented, packaged, and/or framed by the writer, editor, publisher, platform, etc. There are no essential differences between the two genres, in other words. If a piece is presented as nonfiction, there are certain assumptions in play, on the reader’s part, and it makes sense to hold the writer to certain standards of accuracy and accountability that don’t necessarily obtain in fiction. However, oftentimes fiction is more rooted in the real world, in actual people and events, than we realize. And nonfiction, of course, often relies on many of the same narrative devices and dramatic conventions that fiction does, even if we don’t always think of nonfictional accounts as being shaped, constructed, or embellished. Anyway, I hope this project represents a valuable, if small, contribution to ongoing discussions about the limits and advantages of conceptual divides like those between “real” and “invented,” “found” and “made.” Categories like these matter, in part, because they have ethical and political implications: they affect how we go about trying to separate truth from falsehood, right from wrong, just from unjust, and the fixed/given/static from the changeable/contingent/fluid. Ultimately, the difference between “things in the world,” on one hand—the stuff of life—and “things about the world,” on the other—the stuff of art—is, I think, more of a difference in degree than in kind. Narrative helps us see and engage with the world in new ways. And the world itself is always to some extent filtered through the stories we use to organize (and reorganize) it—regardless of whether or not such stories are explicitly “creative” or “literary.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
M.F.A. (Master of Fine Arts)
Level thesis:degree_level
Masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Creative Writing and Media Arts (UMKC)
Grantor dc:publisher
University of Missouri -- Kansas City
Year dc:date.issued
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Paur, Stephen
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Hodgen, Christie, 1974-

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/79708
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/79708

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Missouri - Kansas City
Base URL
mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Paur, Stephen. Bureaucracy and other stories. Masters thesis, University of Missouri -- Kansas City, 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/10355/79708