Back to results

University of Missouri -- Kansas City

Risk of Expectant Management and Optimal Timing of Delivery in Low-risk Term Pregnancies: A Population-based Study

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Introduction The benefits of the current obstetric recommendation to avoid elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation in pregnant women have been questioned by several authors.1 5 Multiple concerns such as increased stillbirth rates, intensive care admission and post maturity syndrome occurring after avoiding elective deliveries before 39 weeks have been raised. Whether the risk of expectant management outweighs the benefits of reaching 39 weeks of gestation has not been studied. Purpose/Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of expectant management in the optimal timing for delivery. Design/Methods Subjects included were all singleton pregnancies that delivered during the term in the year of 2013. Those with complications such as congenital anomalies, diabetes, hypertension, and fetal growth restriction were excluded. Composite outcomes and individual maternal complications, stillbirth rates, neonatal complications and infant death rates were compared among cases that underwent expectant management vs. deliveries that occurred at each term gestational age. Binary logistic regression was employed to calculate odds ratios for complications according to delivery plan at each gestational age at term. Common confounders in the obstetric literature were selected as covariates in the regression models. From 3,994,796 deliveries, 3,199,246 (80.1%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Maternal complications during expectant management were significantly lower at the early-term period and became higher at 39 weeks and above, RR (95% CI) = 1.18 (1.16 – 1.19). Neonatal complication rates during expectant management were also significantly lower during the early-term period, and became higher at 39 weeks and above, RR (95% CI) = 1.09 (1.08 – 1.09). The risk of perinatal mortality in the expectant management group was significantly lower during the early-term period, and became higher at 39 weeks and above, RR (95% CI) = 18.93 (17.83 – 20.10) vs. 17.37 (16.61 – 18.16), p = 0.010. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that complications that arise during expectant management while awaiting full-term do not outweigh the benefits of achieving better outcomes from attempting to reach 39 weeks. However, extending beyond 39 weeks may put these pregnancies at increased risk.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
M.S.
Level thesis:degree_level
Masters
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Bioinformatics (UMKC)
Grantor dc:publisher
University of Missouri -- Kansas City
Year dc:date.issued
2018

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Vilchez, Gustavo
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Gaddis, Monica Louise, 1955-

Rights

Language dc:language.iso
en_US

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/65997
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/65997

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
University of Missouri - Kansas City
Base URL
mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
related terms
citation

Vilchez, Gustavo. Risk of Expectant Management and Optimal Timing of Delivery in Low-risk Term Pregnancies: A Population-based Study. Masters thesis, University of Missouri -- Kansas City, 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/10355/65997