{"id":{"repo_id":"umkc","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/47453"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/umkc/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/47453","repository":{"repo_id":"umkc","name":"University of Missouri - Kansas City","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Development Theory and the Cold War: A Historical Analysis of Latin American Structuralism from 1930 to 1970","abstract":"Latin America has experimented with two different development strategies over the last two centuries. First, and currently, an “outward-oriented” program based on exports of primary commodities. Alternatively, for a few years following World War II, a domestic industrialization from within strategy received support. A consensus that both models failed to achieve sustainable development in Latin America opened space for rethinking development theory and policy in the beginning of the twenty-first century. This dissertation uses an historical approach to analyze the post-WWII development theories in order to inform the new development debate. What motivated alternative theories and how were they conditioned by historical contexts? What were the consequences of accepting the policies prescription originated from these theories in Latin America? Why were alternative models and policies so short-lived? According to this dissertation the demise of development economics was due to both theoretical deficiencies and politics. To become resilient, development theory needs to build its core on historically grounded principles.","abstract_html":"Latin America has experimented with two different development strategies over the last two centuries. First, and currently, an “outward-oriented” program based on exports of primary commodities. Alternatively, for a few years following World War II, a domestic industrialization from within strategy received support. A consensus that both models failed to achieve sustainable development in Latin America opened space for rethinking development theory and policy in the beginning of the twenty-first century. This dissertation uses an historical approach to analyze the post-WWII development theories in order to inform the new development debate. What motivated alternative theories and how were they conditioned by historical contexts? What were the consequences of accepting the policies prescription originated from these theories in Latin America? Why were alternative models and policies so short-lived? According to this dissertation the demise of development economics was due to both theoretical deficiencies and politics. To become resilient, development theory needs to build its core on historically grounded principles.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Bracarense, Natália"],"institution":"University of Missouri--Kansas City","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Economics (UMKC)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Forstater, Mathew, 1961-"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013","date_published":"2013","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:18:22Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10355/47453","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Forstater, Mathew, 1961-"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Bracarense, Natália"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-12-09T14:07:03Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-12-09T14:07:03Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Economics (UMKC)","History (UMKC)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/47453"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed December 9, 2015","Dissertation advisor: Mathew Forstater","Vita","Includes bibliographic references (pages 291-307)","Thesis (Ph.D.)--Department of Economics and Department of History. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2013"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Latin America has experimented with two different development strategies over the last two centuries. First, and currently, an “outward-oriented” program based on exports of primary commodities. Alternatively, for a few years following World War II, a domestic industrialization from within strategy received support. A consensus that both models failed to achieve sustainable development in Latin America opened space for rethinking development theory and policy in the beginning of the twenty-first century. This dissertation uses an historical approach to analyze the post-WWII development theories in order to inform the new development debate. What motivated alternative theories and how were they conditioned by historical contexts? What were the consequences of accepting the policies prescription originated from these theories in Latin America? Why were alternative models and policies so short-lived? According to this dissertation the demise of development economics was due to both theoretical deficiencies and politics. To become resilient, development theory needs to build its core on historically grounded principles."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Development Theory and the Cold War: A Historical Analysis of Latin American Structuralism from 1930 to 1970"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Forstater, Mathew, 1961-"],"dc:creator":["Bracarense, Natália"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-12-09T14:07:03Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-12-09T14:07:03Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013"],"dc:description":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed December 9, 2015","Dissertation advisor: Mathew Forstater","Vita","Includes bibliographic references (pages 291-307)","Thesis (Ph.D.)--Department of Economics and Department of History. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2013"],"dc:description.abstract":["Latin America has experimented with two different development strategies over the last two centuries. First, and currently, an “outward-oriented” program based on exports of primary commodities. Alternatively, for a few years following World War II, a domestic industrialization from within strategy received support. A consensus that both models failed to achieve sustainable development in Latin America opened space for rethinking development theory and policy in the beginning of the twenty-first century. This dissertation uses an historical approach to analyze the post-WWII development theories in order to inform the new development debate. What motivated alternative theories and how were they conditioned by historical contexts? What were the consequences of accepting the policies prescription originated from these theories in Latin America? Why were alternative models and policies so short-lived? According to this dissertation the demise of development economics was due to both theoretical deficiencies and politics. To become resilient, development theory needs to build its core on historically grounded principles."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/47453"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:title":["Development Theory and the Cold War: A Historical Analysis of Latin American Structuralism from 1930 to 1970"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Economics (UMKC)","History (UMKC)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:18:22Z"}