{"id":{"repo_id":"umkc","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/45639"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/umkc/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/45639","repository":{"repo_id":"umkc","name":"University of Missouri - Kansas City","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Some Alternatives to Model Selection and New Approaches to Computing for the Economics. 12/6/2014","abstract":"This interdisciplinary dissertation in statistics, economics, and social science methodology derives a methodological approach for economics from philosophical principles, identi es barriers to its adoption, and presents tools and methods for overcoming those barriers. It addresses aspects of inquiry often treated in the discipline of statistics. The dissertation takes a process philosophy approach encompassing aspects of classical pragmatism and documents the in uence of this problem solving philosophy on Original Institutionalism and its support for a link between Post Keynesian economics and Original Institutionalism. I motivate my contributions with two case studies. The statistical methods used for policy persuasion in the rst case study, in community economics, contrast with the econometric approach and its philosophical and theoretical foundations. After a survey of the Keynes-Tinbergen and Cowles Commission-NBER debates, I conclude that economists should shift emphasis including favoring data analysis over statistical inference, and argue that the methodological approach to statistics built on the problem solving philosophy reclaims the tradition of Keynes and the original institutionalist and joins it with best practice in modern statistics. The second case study, in modern statistical theory focusing on alternatives to model selection, reveals the importance of computational thinking and the institutional adjustments the discipline of statistics carried out in embracing that. I epistemologically justify a new computing paradigm developed from this case study. I then detail a ceremonial role of mathematical rhetoric in the intransigence of economic methodology. I compare and contrast the mathematical rhetoric of Keynes and Samuelson and trace intellectual roots for an instrumental approach toward mathematical rhetoric that join Keynes to the Original Institutionalists through process philosopher and mathematician Alfred North Whitehead in the United Kingdom and Charles Sanders Peirce in the United States. I close with a Moore Method inspired course based on this work which provides a practical start for revising the economics curriculum to reclaim the Keynesian- Institutionalist tradition addressing emerging needs in the discipline as a whole and to train students in the methodological approach I have here worked out.","abstract_html":"This interdisciplinary dissertation in statistics, economics, and social science methodology derives a methodological approach for economics from philosophical principles, identi es barriers to its adoption, and presents tools and methods for overcoming those barriers. It addresses aspects of inquiry often treated in the discipline of statistics. The dissertation takes a process philosophy approach encompassing aspects of classical pragmatism and documents the in uence of this problem solving philosophy on Original Institutionalism and its support for a link between Post Keynesian economics and Original Institutionalism. I motivate my contributions with two case studies. The statistical methods used for policy persuasion in the rst case study, in community economics, contrast with the econometric approach and its philosophical and theoretical foundations. After a survey of the Keynes-Tinbergen and Cowles Commission-NBER debates, I conclude that economists should shift emphasis including favoring data analysis over statistical inference, and argue that the methodological approach to statistics built on the problem solving philosophy reclaims the tradition of Keynes and the original institutionalist and joins it with best practice in modern statistics. The second case study, in modern statistical theory focusing on alternatives to model selection, reveals the importance of computational thinking and the institutional adjustments the discipline of statistics carried out in embracing that. I epistemologically justify a new computing paradigm developed from this case study. I then detail a ceremonial role of mathematical rhetoric in the intransigence of economic methodology. I compare and contrast the mathematical rhetoric of Keynes and Samuelson and trace intellectual roots for an instrumental approach toward mathematical rhetoric that join Keynes to the Original Institutionalists through process philosopher and mathematician Alfred North Whitehead in the United Kingdom and Charles Sanders Peirce in the United States. I close with a Moore Method inspired course based on this work which provides a practical start for revising the economics curriculum to reclaim the Keynesian- Institutionalist tradition addressing emerging needs in the discipline as a whole and to train students in the methodological approach I have here worked out.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Giannakouros, Panayotis"],"institution":"Consortium. University of Missouri--Kansas City","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Economics (UMKC)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Sturgeon, James I."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2014,"date_issued":"2014","date_published":"2014","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:19:15Z","subjects":[],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10355/45639","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Sturgeon, James I."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Giannakouros, Panayotis"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2015-05-26T18:21:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-05-26T18:21:42Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2014"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Economics (UMKC)","Social Science Consortium (UMKC)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Consortium. University of Missouri--Kansas City"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/45639"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed on June 23, 2015","Dissertation advisor: James I. Sturgeon","Vita","Includes bibliographic references (pages 611-649)","Thesis (Ph.D.)--Department of Economics and Social Science Consortium. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2014"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This interdisciplinary dissertation in statistics, economics, and social science methodology derives a methodological approach for economics from philosophical principles, identi es barriers to its adoption, and presents tools and methods for overcoming those barriers. It addresses aspects of inquiry often treated in the discipline of statistics. The dissertation takes a process philosophy approach encompassing aspects of classical pragmatism and documents the in uence of this problem solving philosophy on Original Institutionalism and its support for a link between Post Keynesian economics and Original Institutionalism. I motivate my contributions with two case studies. The statistical methods used for policy persuasion in the rst case study, in community economics, contrast with the econometric approach and its philosophical and theoretical foundations. After a survey of the Keynes-Tinbergen and Cowles Commission-NBER debates, I conclude that economists should shift emphasis including favoring data analysis over statistical inference, and argue that the methodological approach to statistics built on the problem solving philosophy reclaims the tradition of Keynes and the original institutionalist and joins it with best practice in modern statistics. The second case study, in modern statistical theory focusing on alternatives to model selection, reveals the importance of computational thinking and the institutional adjustments the discipline of statistics carried out in embracing that. I epistemologically justify a new computing paradigm developed from this case study. I then detail a ceremonial role of mathematical rhetoric in the intransigence of economic methodology. I compare and contrast the mathematical rhetoric of Keynes and Samuelson and trace intellectual roots for an instrumental approach toward mathematical rhetoric that join Keynes to the Original Institutionalists through process philosopher and mathematician Alfred North Whitehead in the United Kingdom and Charles Sanders Peirce in the United States. I close with a Moore Method inspired course based on this work which provides a practical start for revising the economics curriculum to reclaim the Keynesian- Institutionalist tradition addressing emerging needs in the discipline as a whole and to train students in the methodological approach I have here worked out."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Some Alternatives to Model Selection and New Approaches to Computing for the Economics. 12/6/2014"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Sturgeon, James I."],"dc:creator":["Giannakouros, Panayotis"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2015-05-26T18:21:42Z"],"dc:date.available":["2015-05-26T18:21:42Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2014"],"dc:description":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed on June 23, 2015","Dissertation advisor: James I. Sturgeon","Vita","Includes bibliographic references (pages 611-649)","Thesis (Ph.D.)--Department of Economics and Social Science Consortium. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2014"],"dc:description.abstract":["This interdisciplinary dissertation in statistics, economics, and social science methodology derives a methodological approach for economics from philosophical principles, identi es barriers to its adoption, and presents tools and methods for overcoming those barriers. It addresses aspects of inquiry often treated in the discipline of statistics. The dissertation takes a process philosophy approach encompassing aspects of classical pragmatism and documents the in uence of this problem solving philosophy on Original Institutionalism and its support for a link between Post Keynesian economics and Original Institutionalism. I motivate my contributions with two case studies. The statistical methods used for policy persuasion in the rst case study, in community economics, contrast with the econometric approach and its philosophical and theoretical foundations. After a survey of the Keynes-Tinbergen and Cowles Commission-NBER debates, I conclude that economists should shift emphasis including favoring data analysis over statistical inference, and argue that the methodological approach to statistics built on the problem solving philosophy reclaims the tradition of Keynes and the original institutionalist and joins it with best practice in modern statistics. The second case study, in modern statistical theory focusing on alternatives to model selection, reveals the importance of computational thinking and the institutional adjustments the discipline of statistics carried out in embracing that. I epistemologically justify a new computing paradigm developed from this case study. I then detail a ceremonial role of mathematical rhetoric in the intransigence of economic methodology. I compare and contrast the mathematical rhetoric of Keynes and Samuelson and trace intellectual roots for an instrumental approach toward mathematical rhetoric that join Keynes to the Original Institutionalists through process philosopher and mathematician Alfred North Whitehead in the United Kingdom and Charles Sanders Peirce in the United States. I close with a Moore Method inspired course based on this work which provides a practical start for revising the economics curriculum to reclaim the Keynesian- Institutionalist tradition addressing emerging needs in the discipline as a whole and to train students in the methodological approach I have here worked out."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/45639"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:title":["Some Alternatives to Model Selection and New Approaches to Computing for the Economics. 12/6/2014"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Economics (UMKC)","Social Science Consortium (UMKC)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["Consortium. University of Missouri--Kansas City"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:19:15Z"}