A medicare benefit expansion: inpatient clinical and economic outcomes in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, (CMS) implements National Coverage Decisions (NCD) to expand access or eliminate regional reimbursement differences. Policymakers may estimate clinical and economic consequences through short term pilots or demonstration projects. Objective: Examined whether short term outcomes mirror longer term outcomes for a CMS NCD for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Methods: This observational study examined the inpatient clinical and economic outcomes associated with a CMS NCD for DBS in PD using Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) retrospective data from 1999 through 2007. The Healthcare Utilization Project (HCUP) data, is supported by CMS. HCUP is the largest collection of all-payer, uniform, state-based inpatient surgery administrative data and covers the years of interest. Short-term cross-sectional analysis examined 12 months pre NCD (January 1, 1999 to March 31, 2003); and 12 months post NCD (April 1, 2003 to March 30, 2004). Long-term, cross-sectional analysis examined the three years, three months prior to the the short term pre period (January 1, 1999 to March 31, 2002); and the three years, nine months after the short term post period (April 1 2004 to December 31, 2007). Results: A patient who had DBS surgery in the 12 months post NCD is more likely to be discharged to long or short term care rather than home (OR 3.671, p=0.0249); is associated with longer lengths of stay (0.2888, p=0.0001); and is positively associated with the log of total charges (0.19985, p=0.0240). A patient who has DBS surgery more than 12 months post NCD compared surgery more than 12 months pre NCD, was less likely to have complications (OR 0.376, 0.0004) , was associated with a shorter length of stay (-0.2857, p=0.0093), and is positively associated with the log of total charges (0.33875, p<0.001). Conclusions: These results suggest that after the benefit expansion, outcomes worsened in the short term, and improved in the long term. Policymakers may benefit from a longer term view when forecasting before--or interpreting outcomes after--a benefit design change. Differences in populations served may cause temporary or long term shifts in health outcomes and resource utilization.

Name thesis:degree_name

Ph.D.

Level thesis:degree_level

Doctoral

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Public Administration (UMKC)

Grantor dc:publisher

University of Missouri-Kansas City

Year dc:date.issued

2011

Author dc:creator

• Haley, Jane Castelli, 1962-

Advisor dc:contributor.advisor

• Rasu, Rafia

Language dc:language.iso

en_US

Handle dc:identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/10355/11062

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/11062