{"id":{"repo_id":"umkc","oai_identifier":"oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/110213"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/umkc/oai:mospace.umsystem.edu:10355/110213","repository":{"repo_id":"umkc","name":"University of Missouri - Kansas City","base_url":"https://mospace.umsystem.edu/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The production of treatment courts : an organizational evaluation of job roles, dynamics, and power","abstract":"Treatment courts were developed as an alternative to the traditional criminal court model to address the underlying needs of the justice-involved population in hopes of stopping individuals from cycling in and out of the revolving door of the traditional criminal justice system. This alternative model creates many differences in the courtroom, one specific aspect being the courtroom team members and their prescribed roles. There appears to be a misalignment between how courtroom workgroups were designed to operate in the written law and how they operate in practice, specifically regarding the treatment court model’s principle of collaboration. Based on this finding, it becomes clear that treatment courts change the job roles and power dynamics in the courtroom workgroup. Drawing from Lipsky and Goffman, we see the complexities of these working conditions and the experiences of the workgroup. Semi-structured interviews with treatment court workgroup actors helped illuminate perceived job roles and team dynamics among these individuals.","abstract_html":"Treatment courts were developed as an alternative to the traditional criminal court model to address the underlying needs of the justice-involved population in hopes of stopping individuals from cycling in and out of the revolving door of the traditional criminal justice system. This alternative model creates many differences in the courtroom, one specific aspect being the courtroom team members and their prescribed roles. There appears to be a misalignment between how courtroom workgroups were designed to operate in the written law and how they operate in practice, specifically regarding the treatment court model’s principle of collaboration. Based on this finding, it becomes clear that treatment courts change the job roles and power dynamics in the courtroom workgroup. Drawing from Lipsky and Goffman, we see the complexities of these working conditions and the experiences of the workgroup. Semi-structured interviews with treatment court workgroup actors helped illuminate perceived job roles and team dynamics among these individuals.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["McQuillen, Erin Elise"],"institution":"University of Missouri--Kansas City","degree_name":"M.S. (Master of Science)","degree_level":"Masters","degree_discipline":"Criminal Justice and Criminology (UMKC)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Sexton, Lori"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2025,"date_issued":"2025","date_published":"2025","updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:19:40Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10355/110213","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Sexton, Lori"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["McQuillen, Erin Elise"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2026-01-14T20:06:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2026-01-14T20:06:00Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2025"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Criminal Justice and Criminology (UMKC)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S. (Master of Science)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/110213"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed February 18, 2025","Thesis advisor: Lori Sexton","Vita","Includes bibliographical references (pages 45-47)","Thesis (M.S.)--Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2025"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Treatment courts were developed as an alternative to the traditional criminal court model to address the underlying needs of the justice-involved population in hopes of stopping individuals from cycling in and out of the revolving door of the traditional criminal justice system. This alternative model creates many differences in the courtroom, one specific aspect being the courtroom team members and their prescribed roles. There appears to be a misalignment between how courtroom workgroups were designed to operate in the written law and how they operate in practice, specifically regarding the treatment court model’s principle of collaboration. Based on this finding, it becomes clear that treatment courts change the job roles and power dynamics in the courtroom workgroup. Drawing from Lipsky and Goffman, we see the complexities of these working conditions and the experiences of the workgroup. Semi-structured interviews with treatment court workgroup actors helped illuminate perceived job roles and team dynamics among these individuals."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The production of treatment courts : an organizational evaluation of job roles, dynamics, and power"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Sexton, Lori"],"dc:creator":["McQuillen, Erin Elise"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2026-01-14T20:06:00Z"],"dc:date.available":["2026-01-14T20:06:00Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2025"],"dc:description":["Title from PDF of title page, viewed February 18, 2025","Thesis advisor: Lori Sexton","Vita","Includes bibliographical references (pages 45-47)","Thesis (M.S.)--Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2025"],"dc:description.abstract":["Treatment courts were developed as an alternative to the traditional criminal court model to address the underlying needs of the justice-involved population in hopes of stopping individuals from cycling in and out of the revolving door of the traditional criminal justice system. This alternative model creates many differences in the courtroom, one specific aspect being the courtroom team members and their prescribed roles. There appears to be a misalignment between how courtroom workgroups were designed to operate in the written law and how they operate in practice, specifically regarding the treatment court model’s principle of collaboration. Based on this finding, it becomes clear that treatment courts change the job roles and power dynamics in the courtroom workgroup. Drawing from Lipsky and Goffman, we see the complexities of these working conditions and the experiences of the workgroup. Semi-structured interviews with treatment court workgroup actors helped illuminate perceived job roles and team dynamics among these individuals."],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10355/110213"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:title":["The production of treatment courts : an organizational evaluation of job roles, dynamics, and power"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Criminal Justice and Criminology (UMKC)"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S. (Master of Science)"],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Missouri--Kansas City"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T05:19:40Z"}