{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/99253"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/99253","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Revealed willingness to pay for conservation across the U.S.","abstract":"This paper generates new estimates of the benefits of conservation of different kinds of lands at across the entire U.S. with a novel application of choice experiment methodology in which communities reveal themselves willing (or not) to pay for conservation initiatives. We use the local referenda data from Trust for Public Land from 1988 to 2015 over the entire U.S. at the county level and estimate how the communities value different land types and conservation purposes. We analyze 458 referenda to understand how voting behavior changes with referenda attributes and socio-economic characteristics of the participating communities. Because the communities have already voted for conservation referenda, the estimates reveal their actual WTP for different land use types. Using a logit model, we find that communities value open space, recreation, and endangered species more than conservation projects with other characteristics. The results will help conservationists and policy makers alike to understand how the communities value open spaces and use the knowledge for making informed decisions.","abstract_html":"This paper generates new estimates of the benefits of conservation of different kinds of lands at across the entire U.S. with a novel application of choice experiment methodology in which communities reveal themselves willing (or not) to pay for conservation initiatives. We use the local referenda data from Trust for Public Land from 1988 to 2015 over the entire U.S. at the county level and estimate how the communities value different land types and conservation purposes. We analyze 458 referenda to understand how voting behavior changes with referenda attributes and socio-economic characteristics of the participating communities. Because the communities have already voted for conservation referenda, the estimates reveal their actual WTP for different land use types. Using a logit model, we find that communities value open space, recreation, and endangered species more than conservation projects with other characteristics. The results will help conservationists and policy makers alike to understand how the communities value open spaces and use the knowledge for making informed decisions.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Niraula, Richa"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Agricultural & Applied Econ","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Ando, Amy W."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-03-13T15:28:41Z","date_published":"2018-03-13T15:28:41Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:37Z","subjects":["Willingness to pay (WTP)","Conservation","Referenda"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Richa Niraula"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/99253","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Ando, Amy W."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Niraula, Richa"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2018-03-13T15:28:41Z","2020-03-14T09:15:16Z","2017-12-11","2017-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Agricultural & Applied Econ"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Willingness to pay (WTP)","Conservation","Referenda"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Richa Niraula"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/99253"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["This paper generates new estimates of the benefits of conservation of different kinds of lands at across the entire U.S. with a novel application of choice experiment methodology in which communities reveal themselves willing (or not) to pay for conservation initiatives. We use the local referenda data from Trust for Public Land from 1988 to 2015 over the entire U.S. at the county level and estimate how the communities value different land types and conservation purposes. We analyze 458 referenda to understand how voting behavior changes with referenda attributes and socio-economic characteristics of the participating communities. Because the communities have already voted for conservation referenda, the estimates reveal their actual WTP for different land use types. Using a logit model, we find that communities value open space, recreation, and endangered species more than conservation projects with other characteristics. The results will help conservationists and policy makers alike to understand how the communities value open spaces and use the knowledge for making informed decisions.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2019-12-01","The student, Richa Niraula, accepted the attached license on 2017-12-07 at 18:21.","The student, Richa Niraula, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-12-07 at 18:29.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-12-11 at 10:32.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11911 on 2018-03-13 at 09:57:43","Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-13T15:28:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 NIRAULA-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1187957 bytes, checksum: 5a04272db1b9ecb1075c71ab0e4bd216 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 8de000cf5be68ba93ba9c418044bb498 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-11","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 105217 Lift date: 2020-03-13T15:28:52Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 105217 on 2020-03-14T09:15:16Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Revealed willingness to pay for conservation across the U.S."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Ando, Amy W."],"dc:creator":["Niraula, Richa"],"dc:date":["2018-03-13T15:28:41Z","2020-03-14T09:15:16Z","2017-12-11","2017-12"],"dc:description":["This paper generates new estimates of the benefits of conservation of different kinds of lands at across the entire U.S. with a novel application of choice experiment methodology in which communities reveal themselves willing (or not) to pay for conservation initiatives. We use the local referenda data from Trust for Public Land from 1988 to 2015 over the entire U.S. at the county level and estimate how the communities value different land types and conservation purposes. We analyze 458 referenda to understand how voting behavior changes with referenda attributes and socio-economic characteristics of the participating communities. Because the communities have already voted for conservation referenda, the estimates reveal their actual WTP for different land use types. Using a logit model, we find that communities value open space, recreation, and endangered species more than conservation projects with other characteristics. The results will help conservationists and policy makers alike to understand how the communities value open spaces and use the knowledge for making informed decisions.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2019-12-01","The student, Richa Niraula, accepted the attached license on 2017-12-07 at 18:21.","The student, Richa Niraula, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-12-07 at 18:29.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-12-11 at 10:32.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11911 on 2018-03-13 at 09:57:43","Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-13T15:28:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 NIRAULA-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1187957 bytes, checksum: 5a04272db1b9ecb1075c71ab0e4bd216 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 8de000cf5be68ba93ba9c418044bb498 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-11","Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 105217 Lift date: 2020-03-13T15:28:52Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 105217 on 2020-03-14T09:15:16Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/99253"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Richa Niraula"],"dc:subject":["Willingness to pay (WTP)","Conservation","Referenda"],"dc:title":["Revealed willingness to pay for conservation across the U.S."],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Agricultural & Applied Econ"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:37Z"}