{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98369"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98369","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"You want me to work with who? Stakeholder perceptions of automated team formation in project-based courses","abstract":"Instructors are increasingly using algorithmic tools for team formation, yet little is known about how these tools are applied or how students and instructors perceive their use. We studied a representative team formation tool (CATME) in eight project-based courses. An instructor uses the tool to form teams by surveying students’ working styles, skills, and demographics−then configuring the criteria as input into an algorithm that assigns teams. We surveyed students (N=277) in the courses to gauge their perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the tool and ideas for improving it. We also interviewed instructors (N=13) different from those who taught the eight courses to learn about their criteria selections and perceptions of the tool. Students valued the rational basis for forming teams but desired a stronger voice in criteria selection and explanations as to why they were assigned to a particular team. Instructors appreciated the efficiency of team formation but wanted to view exemplars of criteria used in similar courses. This work contributes recommendations for deploying team formation tools in educational settings and for better satisfying the goals of all stakeholders.","abstract_html":"Instructors are increasingly using algorithmic tools for team formation, yet little is known about how these tools are applied or how students and instructors perceive their use. We studied a representative team formation tool (CATME) in eight project-based courses. An instructor uses the tool to form teams by surveying students’ working styles, skills, and demographics−then configuring the criteria as input into an algorithm that assigns teams. We surveyed students (N=277) in the courses to gauge their perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the tool and ideas for improving it. We also interviewed instructors (N=13) different from those who taught the eight courses to learn about their criteria selections and perceptions of the tool. Students valued the rational basis for forming teams but desired a stronger voice in criteria selection and explanations as to why they were assigned to a particular team. Instructors appreciated the efficiency of team formation but wanted to view exemplars of criteria used in similar courses. This work contributes recommendations for deploying team formation tools in educational settings and for better satisfying the goals of all stakeholders.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Jahanbakhsh, Farnaz"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Computer Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Bailey, Brian P."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-29T17:56:42Z","date_published":"2017-09-29T17:56:42Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z","subjects":["Algorithms","Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME)","Education","Team formation"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Farnaz Jahanbakhsh"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98369","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Bailey, Brian P."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Jahanbakhsh, Farnaz"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-09-29T17:56:42Z","2017-07-14","2017-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Computer Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Algorithms","Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME)","Education","Team formation"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Farnaz Jahanbakhsh"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98369"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Instructors are increasingly using algorithmic tools for team formation, yet little is known about how these tools are applied or how students and instructors perceive their use. We studied a representative team formation tool (CATME) in eight project-based courses. An instructor uses the tool to form teams by surveying students’ working styles, skills, and demographics−then configuring the criteria as input into an algorithm that assigns teams. We surveyed students (N=277) in the courses to gauge their perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the tool and ideas for improving it. We also interviewed instructors (N=13) different from those who taught the eight courses to learn about their criteria selections and perceptions of the tool. Students valued the rational basis for forming teams but desired a stronger voice in criteria selection and explanations as to why they were assigned to a particular team. Instructors appreciated the efficiency of team formation but wanted to view exemplars of criteria used in similar courses. This work contributes recommendations for deploying team formation tools in educational settings and for better satisfying the goals of all stakeholders.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-09-29 without embargo terms","The student, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-11 at 15:04.","The student, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-07-13 at 14:52.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-07-14 at 11:27.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11396 on 2017-09-29 at 11:29:45","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T17:56:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 JAHANBAKHSH-THESIS-2017.pdf: 494516 bytes, checksum: 816fbe92f377b8114d17dd2010dbbc62 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4215 bytes, checksum: 1dc2953771ef9dd37f0e2dadf262f9f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-14"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["You want me to work with who? Stakeholder perceptions of automated team formation in project-based courses"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Bailey, Brian P."],"dc:creator":["Jahanbakhsh, Farnaz"],"dc:date":["2017-09-29T17:56:42Z","2017-07-14","2017-08"],"dc:description":["Instructors are increasingly using algorithmic tools for team formation, yet little is known about how these tools are applied or how students and instructors perceive their use. We studied a representative team formation tool (CATME) in eight project-based courses. An instructor uses the tool to form teams by surveying students’ working styles, skills, and demographics−then configuring the criteria as input into an algorithm that assigns teams. We surveyed students (N=277) in the courses to gauge their perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the tool and ideas for improving it. We also interviewed instructors (N=13) different from those who taught the eight courses to learn about their criteria selections and perceptions of the tool. Students valued the rational basis for forming teams but desired a stronger voice in criteria selection and explanations as to why they were assigned to a particular team. Instructors appreciated the efficiency of team formation but wanted to view exemplars of criteria used in similar courses. This work contributes recommendations for deploying team formation tools in educational settings and for better satisfying the goals of all stakeholders.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-09-29 without embargo terms","The student, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-11 at 15:04.","The student, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-07-13 at 14:52.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-07-14 at 11:27.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11396 on 2017-09-29 at 11:29:45","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T17:56:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 JAHANBAKHSH-THESIS-2017.pdf: 494516 bytes, checksum: 816fbe92f377b8114d17dd2010dbbc62 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4215 bytes, checksum: 1dc2953771ef9dd37f0e2dadf262f9f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-14"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98369"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Farnaz Jahanbakhsh"],"dc:subject":["Algorithms","Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness (CATME)","Education","Team formation"],"dc:title":["You want me to work with who? Stakeholder perceptions of automated team formation in project-based courses"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Computer Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z"}