{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98329"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98329","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Euphemistic rhetoric in advertising during the Comstock Era: the importance of persona and cultural context in the Lysol case","abstract":"From the 1930s to the 1960s, the Lysol douche was the best-selling form of birth control in the U.S.; it was used by women from all socio-economic backgrounds. This dissertation examines the Lysol douche campaign that ran in Hearst’s Cosmopolitan and McCall’s during the 1920s and 1930s, which advertised Lysol as a “personal antiseptic” and “feminine hygiene product.” I chronicle the strategies that the ads used to address women as the primary birth control consumers in their households. This dissertation asserts that Lysol used euphemistic rhetoric and strategic ambiguity combined with powerful, culturally derived arguments about motherhood, marriage, and the authority of science to sell the Lysol douche. Lysol appealed to a tangential connection with the medical community to assume a position of authority in advertising to women. Lysol’s campaign employed aspirational models of wives and mothers based on the changing cultural norms of marriage and motherhood in this time period. Ads encouraged women to stay young, healthy, and “dainty” for their husbands and families. The campaign relied on aspirational images of women who douched with Lysol as wealthy, healthy, and desired in long-term romantic marriages. Negatively toned ads warned women of the consequences of unwanted pregnancy, including divorce, poverty and social stigma. The campaign also provided supposed advice from women “physicians” and coopted language from bacteriology and public health campaigns to convince women that Lysol was a trustworthy product with scientific backing. I demonstrate how these strategies exploited women’s fears and insecurities about being able to adequately care for their health, marriages, and families. This dissertation chronicles the historical moment of the Lysol douche in advertising history. I conclude by addressing the implications of this study for contemporary birth control advertising.","abstract_html":"From the 1930s to the 1960s, the Lysol douche was the best-selling form of birth control in the U.S.; it was used by women from all socio-economic backgrounds. This dissertation examines the Lysol douche campaign that ran in Hearst’s Cosmopolitan and McCall’s during the 1920s and 1930s, which advertised Lysol as a “personal antiseptic” and “feminine hygiene product.” I chronicle the strategies that the ads used to address women as the primary birth control consumers in their households. This dissertation asserts that Lysol used euphemistic rhetoric and strategic ambiguity combined with powerful, culturally derived arguments about motherhood, marriage, and the authority of science to sell the Lysol douche. Lysol appealed to a tangential connection with the medical community to assume a position of authority in advertising to women. Lysol’s campaign employed aspirational models of wives and mothers based on the changing cultural norms of marriage and motherhood in this time period. Ads encouraged women to stay young, healthy, and “dainty” for their husbands and families. The campaign relied on aspirational images of women who douched with Lysol as wealthy, healthy, and desired in long-term romantic marriages. Negatively toned ads warned women of the consequences of unwanted pregnancy, including divorce, poverty and social stigma. The campaign also provided supposed advice from women “physicians” and coopted language from bacteriology and public health campaigns to convince women that Lysol was a trustworthy product with scientific backing. I demonstrate how these strategies exploited women’s fears and insecurities about being able to adequately care for their health, marriages, and families. This dissertation chronicles the historical moment of the Lysol douche in advertising history. I conclude by addressing the implications of this study for contemporary birth control advertising.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Klean Zwilling, Jillian Marie"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Speech Communication","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Finnegan, Cara A.","Gill, Pat","Huhman, Marian","Stole, Inger"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-29T17:56:23Z","date_published":"2017-09-29T17:56:23Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z","subjects":["Rhetoric","Euphemism","Polysemy","Advertising history","Women's studies"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Jillian Klean Zwilling"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98329","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Finnegan, Cara A.","Gill, Pat","Huhman, Marian","Stole, Inger"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Klean Zwilling, Jillian Marie"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-09-29T17:56:23Z","2017-07-05","2017-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Speech Communication"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Rhetoric","Euphemism","Polysemy","Advertising history","Women's studies"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Jillian Klean Zwilling"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98329"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["From the 1930s to the 1960s, the Lysol douche was the best-selling form of birth control in the U.S.; it was used by women from all socio-economic backgrounds. This dissertation examines the Lysol douche campaign that ran in Hearst’s Cosmopolitan and McCall’s during the 1920s and 1930s, which advertised Lysol as a “personal antiseptic” and “feminine hygiene product.” I chronicle the strategies that the ads used to address women as the primary birth control consumers in their households. This dissertation asserts that Lysol used euphemistic rhetoric and strategic ambiguity combined with powerful, culturally derived arguments about motherhood, marriage, and the authority of science to sell the Lysol douche. Lysol appealed to a tangential connection with the medical community to assume a position of authority in advertising to women. Lysol’s campaign employed aspirational models of wives and mothers based on the changing cultural norms of marriage and motherhood in this time period. Ads encouraged women to stay young, healthy, and “dainty” for their husbands and families. The campaign relied on aspirational images of women who douched with Lysol as wealthy, healthy, and desired in long-term romantic marriages. Negatively toned ads warned women of the consequences of unwanted pregnancy, including divorce, poverty and social stigma. The campaign also provided supposed advice from women “physicians” and coopted language from bacteriology and public health campaigns to convince women that Lysol was a trustworthy product with scientific backing. I demonstrate how these strategies exploited women’s fears and insecurities about being able to adequately care for their health, marriages, and families. This dissertation chronicles the historical moment of the Lysol douche in advertising history. I conclude by addressing the implications of this study for contemporary birth control advertising.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-09-29 without embargo terms","The student, Jillian Klean Zwilling, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-03 at 21:20.","The student, Jillian Klean Zwilling, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-07-03 at 21:27.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-07-05 at 16:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11308 on 2017-09-29 at 11:27:49","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T17:56:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 KLEANZWILLING-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 13985504 bytes, checksum: 7368c0ef27be05719e65e84df6020562 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4219 bytes, checksum: b79f10f383e530b3354849b188673101 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4565 bytes, checksum: 1d2fe1f072b7893845729ccbffa68093 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-05"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Euphemistic rhetoric in advertising during the Comstock Era: the importance of persona and cultural context in the Lysol case"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Finnegan, Cara A.","Gill, Pat","Huhman, Marian","Stole, Inger"],"dc:creator":["Klean Zwilling, Jillian Marie"],"dc:date":["2017-09-29T17:56:23Z","2017-07-05","2017-08"],"dc:description":["From the 1930s to the 1960s, the Lysol douche was the best-selling form of birth control in the U.S.; it was used by women from all socio-economic backgrounds. This dissertation examines the Lysol douche campaign that ran in Hearst’s Cosmopolitan and McCall’s during the 1920s and 1930s, which advertised Lysol as a “personal antiseptic” and “feminine hygiene product.” I chronicle the strategies that the ads used to address women as the primary birth control consumers in their households. This dissertation asserts that Lysol used euphemistic rhetoric and strategic ambiguity combined with powerful, culturally derived arguments about motherhood, marriage, and the authority of science to sell the Lysol douche. Lysol appealed to a tangential connection with the medical community to assume a position of authority in advertising to women. Lysol’s campaign employed aspirational models of wives and mothers based on the changing cultural norms of marriage and motherhood in this time period. Ads encouraged women to stay young, healthy, and “dainty” for their husbands and families. The campaign relied on aspirational images of women who douched with Lysol as wealthy, healthy, and desired in long-term romantic marriages. Negatively toned ads warned women of the consequences of unwanted pregnancy, including divorce, poverty and social stigma. The campaign also provided supposed advice from women “physicians” and coopted language from bacteriology and public health campaigns to convince women that Lysol was a trustworthy product with scientific backing. I demonstrate how these strategies exploited women’s fears and insecurities about being able to adequately care for their health, marriages, and families. This dissertation chronicles the historical moment of the Lysol douche in advertising history. I conclude by addressing the implications of this study for contemporary birth control advertising.","Submission original under an indefinite embargo labeled 'Open Access'. The submission was exported from vireo on 2017-09-29 without embargo terms","The student, Jillian Klean Zwilling, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-03 at 21:20.","The student, Jillian Klean Zwilling, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-07-03 at 21:27.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-07-05 at 16:04.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11308 on 2017-09-29 at 11:27:49","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T17:56:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 KLEANZWILLING-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 13985504 bytes, checksum: 7368c0ef27be05719e65e84df6020562 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4219 bytes, checksum: b79f10f383e530b3354849b188673101 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4565 bytes, checksum: 1d2fe1f072b7893845729ccbffa68093 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-05"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98329"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Jillian Klean Zwilling"],"dc:subject":["Rhetoric","Euphemism","Polysemy","Advertising history","Women's studies"],"dc:title":["Euphemistic rhetoric in advertising during the Comstock Era: the importance of persona and cultural context in the Lysol case"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Speech Communication"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z"}