{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98300"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98300","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Can ideas activate behavior? A meta-analysis of the effects of a variety of conceptual priming objects and strategies on behavioral outcomes","abstract":"Behavioral priming traces its roots back to 1890, but recently has been criticized for failure to replicate. In response, researchers argued the need for more meta-analyses (Bargh, 2012). Accordingly, the following meta-analysis sought to estimate its mean effect size and to quantify publication bias as well as the effects of moderators like goal expectancy (ease), filler tasks, goal value, and the directness of the association between prime and outcome. We estimated a mean of d = 0.4220 across 682 eligible effect sizes. Despite evidence of some publication bias, the trim and fill procedure recalculated the mean effect to be d = 0.2661, indicating that behavioral priming is likely a true effect, if perhaps overestimated in the literature. Our findings regarding goal expectancy, filler tasks, and goal value are somewhat mixed, but we consistently found that indirect primes, which require more interpretation to produce the outcome, had larger effect sizes than more direct primes.","abstract_html":"Behavioral priming traces its roots back to 1890, but recently has been criticized for failure to replicate. In response, researchers argued the need for more meta-analyses (Bargh, 2012). Accordingly, the following meta-analysis sought to estimate its mean effect size and to quantify publication bias as well as the effects of moderators like goal expectancy (ease), filler tasks, goal value, and the directness of the association between prime and outcome. We estimated a mean of d = 0.4220 across 682 eligible effect sizes. Despite evidence of some publication bias, the trim and fill procedure recalculated the mean effect to be d = 0.2661, indicating that behavioral priming is likely a true effect, if perhaps overestimated in the literature. Our findings regarding goal expectancy, filler tasks, and goal value are somewhat mixed, but we consistently found that indirect primes, which require more interpretation to produce the outcome, had larger effect sizes than more direct primes.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sanders, Emily Kathleen"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.S.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Albarracín, Dolores"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-29T17:52:27Z","date_published":"2017-09-29T17:52:27Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z","subjects":["Behavioral priming","Meta-analysis"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Emily K. Sanders"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98300","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Albarracín, Dolores"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sanders, Emily Kathleen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-09-29T17:52:27Z","2019-09-30T09:15:29Z","2017-07-19","2017-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.S."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Behavioral priming","Meta-analysis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Emily K. Sanders"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98300"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Behavioral priming traces its roots back to 1890, but recently has been criticized for failure to replicate. In response, researchers argued the need for more meta-analyses (Bargh, 2012). Accordingly, the following meta-analysis sought to estimate its mean effect size and to quantify publication bias as well as the effects of moderators like goal expectancy (ease), filler tasks, goal value, and the directness of the association between prime and outcome. We estimated a mean of d = 0.4220 across 682 eligible effect sizes. Despite evidence of some publication bias, the trim and fill procedure recalculated the mean effect to be d = 0.2661, indicating that behavioral priming is likely a true effect, if perhaps overestimated in the literature. Our findings regarding goal expectancy, filler tasks, and goal value are somewhat mixed, but we consistently found that indirect primes, which require more interpretation to produce the outcome, had larger effect sizes than more direct primes.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-08-01","The student, Emily Sanders, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-18 at 19:35.","The student, Emily Sanders, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-07-18 at 19:42.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-07-19 at 09:28.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11518 on 2017-09-29 at 11:19:45","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T17:52:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 SANDERS-THESIS-2017.pdf: 961263 bytes, checksum: e9e939fddf5e6e418c3ccf065934ba15 (MD5) Sanders Meta-Analysis for Masters Deposit.docx: 5925566 bytes, checksum: 516b20849b56bbda493280a7f3c1f581 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 74ab2a8e9052e19a1f68817a332723f5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-19","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 103508 Lift date: 2019-09-29T17:52:45Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 103508 on 2019-09-30T09:15:29Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Can ideas activate behavior? A meta-analysis of the effects of a variety of conceptual priming objects and strategies on behavioral outcomes"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Albarracín, Dolores"],"dc:creator":["Sanders, Emily Kathleen"],"dc:date":["2017-09-29T17:52:27Z","2019-09-30T09:15:29Z","2017-07-19","2017-08"],"dc:description":["Behavioral priming traces its roots back to 1890, but recently has been criticized for failure to replicate. In response, researchers argued the need for more meta-analyses (Bargh, 2012). Accordingly, the following meta-analysis sought to estimate its mean effect size and to quantify publication bias as well as the effects of moderators like goal expectancy (ease), filler tasks, goal value, and the directness of the association between prime and outcome. We estimated a mean of d = 0.4220 across 682 eligible effect sizes. Despite evidence of some publication bias, the trim and fill procedure recalculated the mean effect to be d = 0.2661, indicating that behavioral priming is likely a true effect, if perhaps overestimated in the literature. Our findings regarding goal expectancy, filler tasks, and goal value are somewhat mixed, but we consistently found that indirect primes, which require more interpretation to produce the outcome, had larger effect sizes than more direct primes.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-08-01","The student, Emily Sanders, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-18 at 19:35.","The student, Emily Sanders, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-07-18 at 19:42.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-07-19 at 09:28.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11518 on 2017-09-29 at 11:19:45","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T17:52:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 SANDERS-THESIS-2017.pdf: 961263 bytes, checksum: e9e939fddf5e6e418c3ccf065934ba15 (MD5) Sanders Meta-Analysis for Masters Deposit.docx: 5925566 bytes, checksum: 516b20849b56bbda493280a7f3c1f581 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4210 bytes, checksum: 74ab2a8e9052e19a1f68817a332723f5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-19","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 103508 Lift date: 2019-09-29T17:52:45Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 103508 on 2019-09-30T09:15:29Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98300"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Emily K. Sanders"],"dc:subject":["Behavioral priming","Meta-analysis"],"dc:title":["Can ideas activate behavior? A meta-analysis of the effects of a variety of conceptual priming objects and strategies on behavioral outcomes"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.S."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z"}