{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98284"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/98284","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Individual differences in syntactic processing during reading: a psycholinguist’s “two disciplines” problem","abstract":"Psycholinguists have identified syntactic structures that are consistently more difficult to read than others. To understand why readers find these structures difficult (and thus, what mechanisms underlie syntactic processing in these contexts), one line of research has sought to link individual differences in reading to individual differences in cognitive abilities. Put another way: how do cognitive differences between readers interact with syntactic processing effects observed across readers? This dissertation describes a single study in which 133 young adults read sentences via a self-paced moving window paradigm and then completed a battery of 16 tasks to assess their abilities in the following areas: language experience, phonological ability, working memory, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed. Three syntactic phenomena were chosen for the current investigation: the relative processing difficulty for object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses; the effect of verb biases in reading a sentential complement; and the tendency to resolve relative clause attachment ambiguities to low attachment sites. Each of these effects is well documented in the psycholinguistic literature, and each has been implicated in processing theories that predict effects of individual differences between adult readers. In both a multi-level mixed-effects regression analysis (1A) and a latent variable analysis (1B), we find correlations between measures of individual differences (notably language experience and memory span scores) and overall reading comprehension, reading speed, and relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution (lower working memory is associated with a high attachment preference). Experimental effects on reading time were not consistent measures within individual subjects, which we suggest limits their ability to correlate with other measures and might explain controversy in the literature over how individual differences are linked to language processing.","abstract_html":"Psycholinguists have identified syntactic structures that are consistently more difficult to read than others. To understand why readers find these structures difficult (and thus, what mechanisms underlie syntactic processing in these contexts), one line of research has sought to link individual differences in reading to individual differences in cognitive abilities. Put another way: how do cognitive differences between readers interact with syntactic processing effects observed across readers? This dissertation describes a single study in which 133 young adults read sentences via a self-paced moving window paradigm and then completed a battery of 16 tasks to assess their abilities in the following areas: language experience, phonological ability, working memory, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed. Three syntactic phenomena were chosen for the current investigation: the relative processing difficulty for object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses; the effect of verb biases in reading a sentential complement; and the tendency to resolve relative clause attachment ambiguities to low attachment sites. Each of these effects is well documented in the psycholinguistic literature, and each has been implicated in processing theories that predict effects of individual differences between adult readers. In both a multi-level mixed-effects regression analysis (1A) and a latent variable analysis (1B), we find correlations between measures of individual differences (notably language experience and memory span scores) and overall reading comprehension, reading speed, and relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution (lower working memory is associated with a high attachment preference). Experimental effects on reading time were not consistent measures within individual subjects, which we suggest limits their ability to correlate with other measures and might explain controversy in the literature over how individual differences are linked to language processing.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["James, Ariel Nicole"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Watson, Duane G.","Dell, Gary S.","Brown-Schmidt, Sarah","Benjamin, Aaron S.","Fraley, R. Chris"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-29T16:39:47Z","date_published":"2017-09-29T16:39:47Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z","subjects":["Psycholinguistics","Self-paced reading","Individual differences","Syntax"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Ariel James"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98284","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Watson, Duane G.","Dell, Gary S.","Brown-Schmidt, Sarah","Benjamin, Aaron S.","Fraley, R. Chris"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["James, Ariel Nicole"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-09-29T16:39:47Z","2019-09-30T09:15:29Z","2017-07-13","2017-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Psycholinguistics","Self-paced reading","Individual differences","Syntax"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Ariel James"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98284"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Psycholinguists have identified syntactic structures that are consistently more difficult to read than others. To understand why readers find these structures difficult (and thus, what mechanisms underlie syntactic processing in these contexts), one line of research has sought to link individual differences in reading to individual differences in cognitive abilities. Put another way: how do cognitive differences between readers interact with syntactic processing effects observed across readers? This dissertation describes a single study in which 133 young adults read sentences via a self-paced moving window paradigm and then completed a battery of 16 tasks to assess their abilities in the following areas: language experience, phonological ability, working memory, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed. Three syntactic phenomena were chosen for the current investigation: the relative processing difficulty for object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses; the effect of verb biases in reading a sentential complement; and the tendency to resolve relative clause attachment ambiguities to low attachment sites. Each of these effects is well documented in the psycholinguistic literature, and each has been implicated in processing theories that predict effects of individual differences between adult readers. In both a multi-level mixed-effects regression analysis (1A) and a latent variable analysis (1B), we find correlations between measures of individual differences (notably language experience and memory span scores) and overall reading comprehension, reading speed, and relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution (lower working memory is associated with a high attachment preference). Experimental effects on reading time were not consistent measures within individual subjects, which we suggest limits their ability to correlate with other measures and might explain controversy in the literature over how individual differences are linked to language processing.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-08-01","The student, Ariel James, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-12 at 12:17.","The student, Ariel James, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-07-12 at 13:03.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-07-13 at 18:08.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11426 on 2017-09-29 at 11:19:14","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T16:39:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 JAMES-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 3626354 bytes, checksum: 942c9a09faac6668aa5a972b80271029 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: b2e1f8fceefaa6a53a1d147f4a70a36e (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4554 bytes, checksum: dfcc1120687e9eb51742412ab0c7e454 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-13","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 103431 Lift date: 2019-09-29T16:39:52Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 103431 Lift date: 2019-09-29T17:52:45Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 103431 on 2019-09-30T09:15:29Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Individual differences in syntactic processing during reading: a psycholinguist’s “two disciplines” problem"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Watson, Duane G.","Dell, Gary S.","Brown-Schmidt, Sarah","Benjamin, Aaron S.","Fraley, R. Chris"],"dc:creator":["James, Ariel Nicole"],"dc:date":["2017-09-29T16:39:47Z","2019-09-30T09:15:29Z","2017-07-13","2017-08"],"dc:description":["Psycholinguists have identified syntactic structures that are consistently more difficult to read than others. To understand why readers find these structures difficult (and thus, what mechanisms underlie syntactic processing in these contexts), one line of research has sought to link individual differences in reading to individual differences in cognitive abilities. Put another way: how do cognitive differences between readers interact with syntactic processing effects observed across readers? This dissertation describes a single study in which 133 young adults read sentences via a self-paced moving window paradigm and then completed a battery of 16 tasks to assess their abilities in the following areas: language experience, phonological ability, working memory, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed. Three syntactic phenomena were chosen for the current investigation: the relative processing difficulty for object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses; the effect of verb biases in reading a sentential complement; and the tendency to resolve relative clause attachment ambiguities to low attachment sites. Each of these effects is well documented in the psycholinguistic literature, and each has been implicated in processing theories that predict effects of individual differences between adult readers. In both a multi-level mixed-effects regression analysis (1A) and a latent variable analysis (1B), we find correlations between measures of individual differences (notably language experience and memory span scores) and overall reading comprehension, reading speed, and relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution (lower working memory is associated with a high attachment preference). Experimental effects on reading time were not consistent measures within individual subjects, which we suggest limits their ability to correlate with other measures and might explain controversy in the literature over how individual differences are linked to language processing.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-08-01","The student, Ariel James, accepted the attached license on 2017-07-12 at 12:17.","The student, Ariel James, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-07-12 at 13:03.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-07-13 at 18:08.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11426 on 2017-09-29 at 11:19:14","Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-29T16:39:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 JAMES-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 3626354 bytes, checksum: 942c9a09faac6668aa5a972b80271029 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: b2e1f8fceefaa6a53a1d147f4a70a36e (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4554 bytes, checksum: dfcc1120687e9eb51742412ab0c7e454 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-13","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 103431 Lift date: 2019-09-29T16:39:52Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 103431 Lift date: 2019-09-29T17:52:45Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 103431 on 2019-09-30T09:15:29Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/98284"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Ariel James"],"dc:subject":["Psycholinguistics","Self-paced reading","Individual differences","Syntax"],"dc:title":["Individual differences in syntactic processing during reading: a psycholinguist’s “two disciplines” problem"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:35Z"}