{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97747"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97747","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"The fraudulent family: humanitarianism, security, and kinship in refugee resettlement from Kenya","abstract":"Based on fieldwork with Somali and Congolese refugees, and with United Nations, NGO (non-governmental organization) and government officials in Nairobi, Kenya (22 months) and Columbus, Ohio (5 months), the dissertation is an ethnography of refugee resettlement processes. Moving between refugee communities and the patchwork of bureaucratic institutions that govern and aid them, the dissertation takes as its focal point discourses of fraud and anti-fraud practices that illuminate contemporary struggles over rights to mobility. More centrally, I argue that “the family”—as symbol, organizing principle, and network of moral obligations—lies at the heart of these contestations. In 2008, over 80% of refugees—largely located in Kenya—“failed” DNA tests performed by the US government in an initiative designed to assess fraud in its Refugee Family Reunification Program. Subsequently, DNA testing became a permanent component of the program. While the US government has narrowed the definition of “family,” making it testable and therefore less vulnerable to so-called fraud, refugees themselves continue to rely on more expansive networks of social care. Such networks emerge from both long-standing practices, but also more recent forces of political violence and displacement in postcolonial Africa. Refugees’ obligations to assist members of these social networks, thus, conflict with humanitarian programs’ imperatives to aid and resettle the refugees deemed most worthy—a category tied up in ideas about the nuclear, biological family. Refugee resettlement is structured by competing claims: protecting refugees on one hand, and protecting national security and Euro-American humanitarian ideals on the other. “The family” constitutes a central locus of these dual claims, treated both as an object of special care and of intense scrutiny. Taking fraud, including “family composition fraud,” as a crucial category, I move critical approaches to kinship to the center of the study of humanitarianism and securitization, while charting the ways in which global refugee resettlement policies shape the borders of transnational communities. In doing so, I argue that contemporary humanitarian policies prioritize not only particular kinds of identities, but also particular kinds of social relations.","abstract_html":"Based on fieldwork with Somali and Congolese refugees, and with United Nations, NGO (non-governmental organization) and government officials in Nairobi, Kenya (22 months) and Columbus, Ohio (5 months), the dissertation is an ethnography of refugee resettlement processes. Moving between refugee communities and the patchwork of bureaucratic institutions that govern and aid them, the dissertation takes as its focal point discourses of fraud and anti-fraud practices that illuminate contemporary struggles over rights to mobility. More centrally, I argue that “the family”—as symbol, organizing principle, and network of moral obligations—lies at the heart of these contestations. In 2008, over 80% of refugees—largely located in Kenya—“failed” DNA tests performed by the US government in an initiative designed to assess fraud in its Refugee Family Reunification Program. Subsequently, DNA testing became a permanent component of the program. While the US government has narrowed the definition of “family,” making it testable and therefore less vulnerable to so-called fraud, refugees themselves continue to rely on more expansive networks of social care. Such networks emerge from both long-standing practices, but also more recent forces of political violence and displacement in postcolonial Africa. Refugees’ obligations to assist members of these social networks, thus, conflict with humanitarian programs’ imperatives to aid and resettle the refugees deemed most worthy—a category tied up in ideas about the nuclear, biological family. Refugee resettlement is structured by competing claims: protecting refugees on one hand, and protecting national security and Euro-American humanitarian ideals on the other. “The family” constitutes a central locus of these dual claims, treated both as an object of special care and of intense scrutiny. Taking fraud, including “family composition fraud,” as a crucial category, I move critical approaches to kinship to the center of the study of humanitarianism and securitization, while charting the ways in which global refugee resettlement policies shape the borders of transnational communities. In doing so, I argue that contemporary humanitarian policies prioritize not only particular kinds of identities, but also particular kinds of social relations.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Balakian, Sophia Ann"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"Ph.D.","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Anthropology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Gottlieb, Alma","Moodie, Ellen","Dominguez, Virginia","Brennan, James"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-08-10T20:33:13Z","date_published":"2017-08-10T20:33:13Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z","subjects":["Refugees","Humanitarianism","Security","Kinship","Family","Migration","Resettlement","Mobility","Bureaucracy","Kenya","Nairobi","United States","Ohio"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Sophia Balakian"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97747","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Gottlieb, Alma","Moodie, Ellen","Dominguez, Virginia","Brennan, James"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Balakian, Sophia Ann"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-08-10T20:33:13Z","2019-08-11T09:15:39Z","2017-04-20","2017-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Anthropology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph.D."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Refugees","Humanitarianism","Security","Kinship","Family","Migration","Resettlement","Mobility","Bureaucracy","Kenya","Nairobi","United States","Ohio"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Sophia Balakian"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97747"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Based on fieldwork with Somali and Congolese refugees, and with United Nations, NGO (non-governmental organization) and government officials in Nairobi, Kenya (22 months) and Columbus, Ohio (5 months), the dissertation is an ethnography of refugee resettlement processes. Moving between refugee communities and the patchwork of bureaucratic institutions that govern and aid them, the dissertation takes as its focal point discourses of fraud and anti-fraud practices that illuminate contemporary struggles over rights to mobility. More centrally, I argue that “the family”—as symbol, organizing principle, and network of moral obligations—lies at the heart of these contestations. In 2008, over 80% of refugees—largely located in Kenya—“failed” DNA tests performed by the US government in an initiative designed to assess fraud in its Refugee Family Reunification Program. Subsequently, DNA testing became a permanent component of the program. While the US government has narrowed the definition of “family,” making it testable and therefore less vulnerable to so-called fraud, refugees themselves continue to rely on more expansive networks of social care. Such networks emerge from both long-standing practices, but also more recent forces of political violence and displacement in postcolonial Africa. Refugees’ obligations to assist members of these social networks, thus, conflict with humanitarian programs’ imperatives to aid and resettle the refugees deemed most worthy—a category tied up in ideas about the nuclear, biological family. Refugee resettlement is structured by competing claims: protecting refugees on one hand, and protecting national security and Euro-American humanitarian ideals on the other. “The family” constitutes a central locus of these dual claims, treated both as an object of special care and of intense scrutiny. Taking fraud, including “family composition fraud,” as a crucial category, I move critical approaches to kinship to the center of the study of humanitarianism and securitization, while charting the ways in which global refugee resettlement policies shape the borders of transnational communities. In doing so, I argue that contemporary humanitarian policies prioritize not only particular kinds of identities, but also particular kinds of social relations.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2019-05-01","The student, Sophia Balakian, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-19 at 15:33.","The student, Sophia Balakian, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-04-19 at 16:10.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-04-20 at 15:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #10908 on 2017-08-10 at 15:06:23","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T20:33:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 BALAKIAN-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 49364662 bytes, checksum: 604ff6b60ff1cffbe84c1ab116d75629 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 167523f5b37335c1f7479f4aa0d49f34 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4558 bytes, checksum: 41d6975b076e3c41f058ca6908421de4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-20","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 102800 Lift date: 2019-08-10T21:27:21Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 102800 on 2019-08-11T09:15:39Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The fraudulent family: humanitarianism, security, and kinship in refugee resettlement from Kenya"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Gottlieb, Alma","Moodie, Ellen","Dominguez, Virginia","Brennan, James"],"dc:creator":["Balakian, Sophia Ann"],"dc:date":["2017-08-10T20:33:13Z","2019-08-11T09:15:39Z","2017-04-20","2017-05"],"dc:description":["Based on fieldwork with Somali and Congolese refugees, and with United Nations, NGO (non-governmental organization) and government officials in Nairobi, Kenya (22 months) and Columbus, Ohio (5 months), the dissertation is an ethnography of refugee resettlement processes. Moving between refugee communities and the patchwork of bureaucratic institutions that govern and aid them, the dissertation takes as its focal point discourses of fraud and anti-fraud practices that illuminate contemporary struggles over rights to mobility. More centrally, I argue that “the family”—as symbol, organizing principle, and network of moral obligations—lies at the heart of these contestations. In 2008, over 80% of refugees—largely located in Kenya—“failed” DNA tests performed by the US government in an initiative designed to assess fraud in its Refugee Family Reunification Program. Subsequently, DNA testing became a permanent component of the program. While the US government has narrowed the definition of “family,” making it testable and therefore less vulnerable to so-called fraud, refugees themselves continue to rely on more expansive networks of social care. Such networks emerge from both long-standing practices, but also more recent forces of political violence and displacement in postcolonial Africa. Refugees’ obligations to assist members of these social networks, thus, conflict with humanitarian programs’ imperatives to aid and resettle the refugees deemed most worthy—a category tied up in ideas about the nuclear, biological family. Refugee resettlement is structured by competing claims: protecting refugees on one hand, and protecting national security and Euro-American humanitarian ideals on the other. “The family” constitutes a central locus of these dual claims, treated both as an object of special care and of intense scrutiny. Taking fraud, including “family composition fraud,” as a crucial category, I move critical approaches to kinship to the center of the study of humanitarianism and securitization, while charting the ways in which global refugee resettlement policies shape the borders of transnational communities. In doing so, I argue that contemporary humanitarian policies prioritize not only particular kinds of identities, but also particular kinds of social relations.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2019-05-01","The student, Sophia Balakian, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-19 at 15:33.","The student, Sophia Balakian, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2017-04-19 at 16:10.","This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2017-04-20 at 15:31.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #10908 on 2017-08-10 at 15:06:23","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T20:33:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 BALAKIAN-DISSERTATION-2017.pdf: 49364662 bytes, checksum: 604ff6b60ff1cffbe84c1ab116d75629 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4212 bytes, checksum: 167523f5b37335c1f7479f4aa0d49f34 (MD5) PROQUEST_LICENSE.txt: 4558 bytes, checksum: 41d6975b076e3c41f058ca6908421de4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-20","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 102800 Lift date: 2019-08-10T21:27:21Z Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","U of I Only Restriction Lifted for Item 102800 on 2019-08-11T09:15:39Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97747"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Sophia Balakian"],"dc:subject":["Refugees","Humanitarianism","Security","Kinship","Family","Migration","Resettlement","Mobility","Bureaucracy","Kenya","Nairobi","United States","Ohio"],"dc:title":["The fraudulent family: humanitarianism, security, and kinship in refugee resettlement from Kenya"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Anthropology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph.D."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z"}