{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97635"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97635","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Experience sampling methods (ESM) in organizations: a review","abstract":"We review research designs of ESM studies conducted in workplace settings (k = 167 samples). Eight ESM design features are summarized: sample size and number of observations, response rates, recruitment methods and incentives, survey timing factors (study duration, signal frequency, times of day), signaling strategies and reminder technologies, survey media, survey items (number of items, item sampling, constructs measured), and analytic strategies (lagged analyses, missing data treatment). Mean sample size was 93 and number of observations was 1,419. Average study duration was 10.13 days. Among studies that used multiple signals per day (56%), the average was 4.16 signals per day. 54% of studies did not report using incentives, 41% did not use reminders. Longer studies were more likely to provide incentives. Over time, online surveys are rising whereas paper-and-pencil surveys are disappearing. The average between-persons response rate was 63%, and within-persons response rate was 80%; although response rates were unrelated to incentives/design features. Interval-contingent signaling was most prevalent (59%), followed by signal-contingent signaling (19%). Event-contingent signaling was rare (4%). Few studies reported missing data treatments. Findings and implications are discussed.","abstract_html":"We review research designs of ESM studies conducted in workplace settings (k = 167 samples). Eight ESM design features are summarized: sample size and number of observations, response rates, recruitment methods and incentives, survey timing factors (study duration, signal frequency, times of day), signaling strategies and reminder technologies, survey media, survey items (number of items, item sampling, constructs measured), and analytic strategies (lagged analyses, missing data treatment). Mean sample size was 93 and number of observations was 1,419. Average study duration was 10.13 days. Among studies that used multiple signals per day (56%), the average was 4.16 signals per day. 54% of studies did not report using incentives, 41% did not use reminders. Longer studies were more likely to provide incentives. Over time, online surveys are rising whereas paper-and-pencil surveys are disappearing. The average between-persons response rate was 63%, and within-persons response rate was 80%; although response rates were unrelated to incentives/design features. Interval-contingent signaling was most prevalent (59%), followed by signal-contingent signaling (19%). Event-contingent signaling was rare (4%). Few studies reported missing data treatments. Findings and implications are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Yearick, Kathleen A."],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Newman, Daniel A.","Rounds, James"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-08-10T19:52:24Z","date_published":"2017-08-10T19:52:24Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z","subjects":["Experience sampling methods","Ecological momentary assessment","Daily diary studies","Within-persons"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Kathleen Yearick"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97635","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Newman, Daniel A.","Rounds, James"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Yearick, Kathleen A."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-08-10T19:52:24Z","2019-08-11T09:15:17Z","2017-04-26","2017-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Experience sampling methods","Ecological momentary assessment","Daily diary studies","Within-persons"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Kathleen Yearick"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97635"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["We review research designs of ESM studies conducted in workplace settings (k = 167 samples). Eight ESM design features are summarized: sample size and number of observations, response rates, recruitment methods and incentives, survey timing factors (study duration, signal frequency, times of day), signaling strategies and reminder technologies, survey media, survey items (number of items, item sampling, constructs measured), and analytic strategies (lagged analyses, missing data treatment). Mean sample size was 93 and number of observations was 1,419. Average study duration was 10.13 days. Among studies that used multiple signals per day (56%), the average was 4.16 signals per day. 54% of studies did not report using incentives, 41% did not use reminders. Longer studies were more likely to provide incentives. Over time, online surveys are rising whereas paper-and-pencil surveys are disappearing. The average between-persons response rate was 63%, and within-persons response rate was 80%; although response rates were unrelated to incentives/design features. Interval-contingent signaling was most prevalent (59%), followed by signal-contingent signaling (19%). Event-contingent signaling was rare (4%). Few studies reported missing data treatments. Findings and implications are discussed.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-05-01","The student, Kathleen Yearick, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-25 at 17:14.","The student, Kathleen Yearick, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-04-25 at 17:20.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-04-26 at 10:50.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11069 on 2017-08-10 at 14:32:40","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:52:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 YEARICK-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1120689 bytes, checksum: b36520080e0ed36a83f6dc8deec3f926 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 08fe6d4416dc942aa9813b980dadea83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-26","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 102688 Lift date: 2019-08-10T21:25:30Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 102688 on 2019-08-11T09:15:17Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Experience sampling methods (ESM) in organizations: a review"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Newman, Daniel A.","Rounds, James"],"dc:creator":["Yearick, Kathleen A."],"dc:date":["2017-08-10T19:52:24Z","2019-08-11T09:15:17Z","2017-04-26","2017-05"],"dc:description":["We review research designs of ESM studies conducted in workplace settings (k = 167 samples). Eight ESM design features are summarized: sample size and number of observations, response rates, recruitment methods and incentives, survey timing factors (study duration, signal frequency, times of day), signaling strategies and reminder technologies, survey media, survey items (number of items, item sampling, constructs measured), and analytic strategies (lagged analyses, missing data treatment). Mean sample size was 93 and number of observations was 1,419. Average study duration was 10.13 days. Among studies that used multiple signals per day (56%), the average was 4.16 signals per day. 54% of studies did not report using incentives, 41% did not use reminders. Longer studies were more likely to provide incentives. Over time, online surveys are rising whereas paper-and-pencil surveys are disappearing. The average between-persons response rate was 63%, and within-persons response rate was 80%; although response rates were unrelated to incentives/design features. Interval-contingent signaling was most prevalent (59%), followed by signal-contingent signaling (19%). Event-contingent signaling was rare (4%). Few studies reported missing data treatments. Findings and implications are discussed.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-05-01","The student, Kathleen Yearick, accepted the attached license on 2017-04-25 at 17:14.","The student, Kathleen Yearick, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-04-25 at 17:20.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-04-26 at 10:50.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #11069 on 2017-08-10 at 14:32:40","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:52:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 YEARICK-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1120689 bytes, checksum: b36520080e0ed36a83f6dc8deec3f926 (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4213 bytes, checksum: 08fe6d4416dc942aa9813b980dadea83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-04-26","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 102688 Lift date: 2019-08-10T21:25:30Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 102688 on 2019-08-11T09:15:17Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97635"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Kathleen Yearick"],"dc:subject":["Experience sampling methods","Ecological momentary assessment","Daily diary studies","Within-persons"],"dc:title":["Experience sampling methods (ESM) in organizations: a review"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z"}