{"id":{"repo_id":"uiuc","oai_identifier":"oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97538"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/uiuc/oai:www.ideals.illinois.edu:2142/97538","repository":{"repo_id":"uiuc","name":"University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign","base_url":"https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/oai-pmh"},"display":{"title":"Measurement equivalence of the Comprehensive Personality Scales across cultures: an item response theory approach","abstract":"Within the item response theory (IRT) framework, this study compared cross-culturally different approaches to the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in two personality tests of the Comprehensive Personality Scale (Wang, 2013). A dominance IRT model (SGRM) and an ideal point model (the GGUM) were applied within the NHST paradigm, due to the debate over which is the more appropriate model for personality research. Nye’s (2011) DIF effect size measure was also used in the current study to overcome the oversensitivity of NHST to large sample size. Participants from the U.S. (n = 861) and China (n = 1023) responded to two personality scales from the CPS: the Well-being scale, and the Curiosity scale. Results indicated that SGR was applicable for DIF assessment, but the NHST paradigm was so sensitive to large samples that even trivial DIF could be significant. GGUM failed to work in the DIF analyses due to ill-conditioned matrices. The DIF effect size measure compensated for the NHST method by providing the magnitude of DIF. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.","abstract_html":"Within the item response theory (IRT) framework, this study compared cross-culturally different approaches to the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in two personality tests of the Comprehensive Personality Scale (Wang, 2013). A dominance IRT model (SGRM) and an ideal point model (the GGUM) were applied within the NHST paradigm, due to the debate over which is the more appropriate model for personality research. Nye’s (2011) DIF effect size measure was also used in the current study to overcome the oversensitivity of NHST to large sample size. Participants from the U.S. (n = 861) and China (n = 1023) responded to two personality scales from the CPS: the Well-being scale, and the Curiosity scale. Results indicated that SGR was applicable for DIF assessment, but the NHST paradigm was so sensitive to large samples that even trivial DIF could be significant. GGUM failed to work in the DIF analyses due to ill-conditioned matrices. The DIF effect size measure compensated for the NHST method by providing the magnitude of DIF. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Zhang, Luyao"],"institution":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Drasgow, Fritz"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-08-10T19:51:37Z","date_published":"2017-08-10T19:51:37Z","updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z","subjects":["Item response theory","Differential item functioning (DIF)","Dominance model","Samejima's graded response (SGR) model","Ideal point model","The generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM)"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Copyright 2017 Luyao Zhang"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97538","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Drasgow, Fritz"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Zhang, Luyao"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2017-08-10T19:51:37Z","2019-08-11T09:15:09Z","2017-03-07","2017-05"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Item response theory","Differential item functioning (DIF)","Dominance model","Samejima's graded response (SGR) model","Ideal point model","The generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright 2017 Luyao Zhang"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97538"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["Within the item response theory (IRT) framework, this study compared cross-culturally different approaches to the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in two personality tests of the Comprehensive Personality Scale (Wang, 2013). A dominance IRT model (SGRM) and an ideal point model (the GGUM) were applied within the NHST paradigm, due to the debate over which is the more appropriate model for personality research. Nye’s (2011) DIF effect size measure was also used in the current study to overcome the oversensitivity of NHST to large sample size. Participants from the U.S. (n = 861) and China (n = 1023) responded to two personality scales from the CPS: the Well-being scale, and the Curiosity scale. Results indicated that SGR was applicable for DIF assessment, but the NHST paradigm was so sensitive to large samples that even trivial DIF could be significant. GGUM failed to work in the DIF analyses due to ill-conditioned matrices. The DIF effect size measure compensated for the NHST method by providing the magnitude of DIF. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-05-01","The student, Luyao Zhang, accepted the attached license on 2017-03-07 at 14:03.","The student, Luyao Zhang, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-03-07 at 14:06.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-03-07 at 16:11.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #10567 on 2017-08-10 at 14:29:33","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:51:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 ZHANG-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1267932 bytes, checksum: 598e33ed6dbb8472b8cd42b2d9dbe7cf (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: 05dded84ecba63718dd4461827ba65fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-07","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 102591 Lift date: 2019-08-10T21:25:30Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 102591 on 2019-08-11T09:15:09Z."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Measurement equivalence of the Comprehensive Personality Scales across cultures: an item response theory approach"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Drasgow, Fritz"],"dc:creator":["Zhang, Luyao"],"dc:date":["2017-08-10T19:51:37Z","2019-08-11T09:15:09Z","2017-03-07","2017-05"],"dc:description":["Within the item response theory (IRT) framework, this study compared cross-culturally different approaches to the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in two personality tests of the Comprehensive Personality Scale (Wang, 2013). A dominance IRT model (SGRM) and an ideal point model (the GGUM) were applied within the NHST paradigm, due to the debate over which is the more appropriate model for personality research. Nye’s (2011) DIF effect size measure was also used in the current study to overcome the oversensitivity of NHST to large sample size. Participants from the U.S. (n = 861) and China (n = 1023) responded to two personality scales from the CPS: the Well-being scale, and the Curiosity scale. Results indicated that SGR was applicable for DIF assessment, but the NHST paradigm was so sensitive to large samples that even trivial DIF could be significant. GGUM failed to work in the DIF analyses due to ill-conditioned matrices. The DIF effect size measure compensated for the NHST method by providing the magnitude of DIF. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.","Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'Closed Access', the embargo will last until 2019-05-01","The student, Luyao Zhang, accepted the attached license on 2017-03-07 at 14:03.","The student, Luyao Zhang, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2017-03-07 at 14:06.","This Thesis was approved for publication on 2017-03-07 at 16:11.","DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #10567 on 2017-08-10 at 14:29:33","Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-10T19:51:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 ZHANG-THESIS-2017.pdf: 1267932 bytes, checksum: 598e33ed6dbb8472b8cd42b2d9dbe7cf (MD5) LICENSE.txt: 4208 bytes, checksum: 05dded84ecba63718dd4461827ba65fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-07","Embargo set by: Colleen Fallaw for item 102591 Lift date: 2019-08-10T21:25:30Z Reason: Author requested closed access (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system","Limited Restriction Lifted for Item 102591 on 2019-08-11T09:15:09Z."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97538"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["Copyright 2017 Luyao Zhang"],"dc:subject":["Item response theory","Differential item functioning (DIF)","Dominance model","Samejima's graded response (SGR) model","Ideal point model","The generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM)"],"dc:title":["Measurement equivalence of the Comprehensive Personality Scales across cultures: an item response theory approach"],"dc:type":["text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."],"thesis:institution_name":["University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-22T22:24:34Z"}